Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 35.4 (34.9, 35.9) N/A 4,433 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Barry County 6 Urban 35.1 (29.3, 41.8) 43 (6, 74) 28 stable stable trend 4.8 (-4.7, 27.4)
Bay County 6 Urban 39.5 (34.8, 44.7) 23 (4, 52) 56 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Benzie County 6 Urban 33.5 (23.7, 46.5) 48 (2, 80) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -1.3)
Berrien County 6 Urban 39.7 (35.9, 43.9) 21 (5, 47) 85 stable stable trend -1.3 (-10.5, 5.7)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 35.0 (31.0, 39.4) 46 (14, 67) 59 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 10.6)
Cass County 6 Urban 29.9 (24.3, 36.5) 62 (20, 79) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.3)
Clinton County 6 Urban 30.9 (26.1, 36.4) 56 (22, 77) 31 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Eaton County 6 Urban 32.0 (27.8, 36.6) 54 (23, 74) 46 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Genesee County 6 Urban 28.2 (26.1, 30.4) 71 (53, 76) 144 falling falling trend -13.9 (-22.0, -4.9)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 37.0 (32.2, 42.3) 35 (7, 66) 47 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Ingham County 6 Urban 30.0 (27.1, 33.0) 61 (39, 75) 88 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.7)
Ionia County 6 Urban 37.0 (30.9, 44.0) 34 (4, 70) 27 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Jackson County 6 Urban 35.0 (31.4, 39.0) 45 (15, 66) 72 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 32.6 (29.7, 35.8) 51 (29, 69) 93 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.7)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 41.3 (30.0, 55.9) 13 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Kent County 6 Urban 32.9 (30.9, 34.9) 49 (33, 64) 224 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 37.3 (32.3, 42.9) 32 (5, 64) 44 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.5)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 27.7 (19.7, 38.4) 73 (11, 80) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.4)
Livingston County 6 Urban 30.6 (27.5, 34.0) 59 (36, 75) 76 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Macomb County 6 Urban 38.1 (36.5, 39.9) 27 (15, 42) 424 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Midland County 6 Urban 32.5 (27.7, 37.9) 52 (17, 76) 36 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.8, 14.7)
Monroe County 6 Urban 30.4 (27.0, 34.1) 60 (35, 76) 62 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 37.9 (32.1, 44.6) 28 (3, 67) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 23.5 (20.6, 26.7) 78 (65, 80) 51 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -2.1)
Oakland County 6 Urban 36.1 (34.8, 37.5) 40 (23, 47) 580 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 2.9)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 27.8 (25.2, 30.6) 72 (51, 78) 88 stable stable trend 3.1 (-3.5, 9.9)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 40.1 (36.5, 44.0) 19 (5, 44) 99 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 42.2 (38.2, 46.5) 10 (2, 39) 89 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 29.6 (27.2, 32.2) 65 (44, 75) 116 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.2)
Wayne County 6 Urban 40.7 (39.5, 42.0) 16 (8, 29) 853 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.6)
Alcona County 6 Rural 41.1 (26.6, 62.6) 14 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 0.8)
Alger County 6 Rural 29.2 (17.1, 48.1) 66 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.5, 0.8)
Allegan County 6 Rural 28.9 (25.0, 33.4) 70 (36, 78) 41 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.6)
Alpena County 6 Rural 38.7 (30.6, 48.6) 25 (1, 73) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Antrim County 6 Rural 32.6 (24.3, 43.4) 50 (4, 80) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.4, -1.0)
Arenac County 6 Rural 36.4 (25.5, 51.1) 36 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-4.0, 22.0)
Branch County 6 Rural 40.5 (33.2, 48.9) 18 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 26.7 (19.7, 35.9) 74 (20, 80) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.8)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 35.3 (26.2, 46.7) 42 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend 19.0 (-1.3, 35.0)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 40.6 (32.5, 50.2) 17 (1, 70) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.9)
Clare County 6 Rural 42.5 (34.2, 52.5) 9 (1, 63) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 36.2 (26.3, 50.0) 39 (1, 79) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.4)
Delta County 6 Rural 29.8 (23.5, 37.6) 63 (15, 80) 18 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.5, -1.7)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 23.2 (17.2, 31.1) 79 (42, 80) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.6, -1.6)
Emmet County 6 Rural 26.4 (20.0, 34.5) 76 (28, 80) 13 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.7)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 44.9 (34.8, 57.1) 5 (1, 64) 18 stable stable trend 10.5 (-0.1, 29.7)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 24.6 (16.5, 36.5) 77 (13, 80) 7 falling falling trend -16.2 (-37.0, -3.5)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 42.0 (34.4, 50.9) 12 (1, 62) 22 falling falling trend -3.9 (-13.8, -2.1)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 37.6 (31.0, 45.4) 29 (3, 71) 24 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.2)
Houghton County 6 Rural 19.3 (13.4, 26.9) 80 (59, 80) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.9)
Huron County 6 Rural 43.7 (35.5, 53.6) 7 (1, 62) 23 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.1)
Iosco County 6 Rural 36.1 (27.2, 47.3) 41 (2, 77) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.1)
Iron County 6 Rural 37.5 (25.6, 54.3) 30 (1, 79) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.4, -1.9)
Isabella County 6 Rural 45.1 (37.7, 53.5) 4 (1, 49) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Lake County 6 Rural 36.3 (25.5, 51.7) 37 (1, 80) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.4)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 32.2 (27.8, 37.2) 53 (22, 75) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 37.1 (24.3, 55.3) 33 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.4, 4.8)
Manistee County 6 Rural 46.7 (36.8, 58.9) 3 (1, 55) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.6)
Marquette County 6 Rural 29.0 (23.8, 35.0) 68 (26, 79) 24 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 1.9)
Mason County 6 Rural 26.5 (19.5, 35.4) 75 (15, 80) 11 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.1, 0.0)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 40.8 (32.6, 50.4) 15 (1, 68) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.1)
Menominee County 6 Rural 29.0 (21.8, 38.3) 69 (13, 80) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.1, 4.5)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 43.2 (31.7, 58.1) 8 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.8)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 53.9 (37.0, 77.5) 1 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 4.1)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 36.2 (29.6, 44.0) 38 (3, 73) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.5)
Oceana County 6 Rural 30.7 (22.7, 40.8) 57 (6, 80) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.2, -0.7)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 38.6 (29.2, 50.7) 26 (1, 76) 14 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.1, -1.8)
Ontonagon County 6 Rural 30.7 (18.9, 55.2) 58 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.3, 0.9)
Osceola County 6 Rural 42.2 (32.7, 53.9) 11 (1, 71) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.0)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 48.5 (31.7, 72.6) 2 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.5, 5.2)
Otsego County 6 Rural 29.6 (21.9, 39.6) 64 (8, 80) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.1)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 37.3 (24.2, 55.7) 31 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 1.5)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 38.8 (29.3, 50.9) 24 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.5)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 44.7 (37.3, 53.4) 6 (1, 50) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural 29.1 (17.8, 47.4) 67 (3, 80) 4 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.8, -0.6)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 31.4 (26.2, 37.3) 55 (17, 78) 28 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.4)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 39.6 (33.4, 46.8) 22 (2, 63) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.6)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 35.1 (29.1, 42.0) 44 (7, 74) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 34.1 (28.9, 40.1) 47 (10, 74) 33 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Wexford County 6 Rural 40.0 (31.9, 49.7) 20 (1, 73) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 2.1)
Baraga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 5:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Baraga, Keweenaw, Luce

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top