Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 7.1 (6.9, 7.3) N/A 989 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Wayne County 6 Urban 9.9 (9.3, 10.5) 2 (1, 7) 227 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 0.9)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 5.3 (4.3, 6.4) 44 (18, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.1)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 6.7 (4.6, 9.5) 19 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 6.6)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 5.9 (3.7, 9.1) 35 (3, 47) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.1, 9.3)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 5.9 (3.8, 8.8) 36 (3, 47) 5
*
*
St. Clair County 6 Urban 5.0 (3.8, 6.5) 45 (17, 47) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.4, 2.0)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.4, 8.0) 43 (6, 47) 5 falling falling trend -9.0 (-32.9, -0.2)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 8.7 (7.2, 10.4) 4 (1, 25) 25 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.7, 5.9)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 8.1 (4.9, 14.1) 5 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.6, 6.1)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 39 (13, 46) 20 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.0, 13.9)
Oakland County 6 Urban 6.5 (6.0, 7.1) 23 (12, 36) 113 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 7.0 (4.4, 10.7) 14 (1, 47) 5 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.9, 9.0)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.6) 17 (4, 43) 17 stable stable trend 3.7 (-15.1, 17.5)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.1, 9.1) 29 (3, 47) 6 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.4, 10.5)
Monroe County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) 40 (10, 47) 14 stable stable trend -11.4 (-27.6, 0.5)
Midland County 6 Urban 6.6 (4.6, 9.2) 22 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.7)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 7.9 (4.8, 12.6) 8 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.9, 7.7)
Marquette County 6 Rural 4.6 (2.8, 7.4) 46 (10, 47) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.3)
Macomb County 6 Urban 7.8 (7.1, 8.6) 10 (4, 22) 95 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.8, -1.8)
Livingston County 6 Urban 6.7 (5.3, 8.3) 20 (5, 45) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 4.1)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 6.5 (4.7, 8.7) 24 (3, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.7, 5.3)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 6.3 (4.5, 8.7) 27 (4, 47) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.9, 9.9)
Kent County 6 Urban 9.4 (8.5, 10.5) 3 (1, 12) 70 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.9, 5.5)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 10.8 (6.1, 18.5) 1 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 5.5 (4.4, 6.8) 41 (14, 47) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.6, 6.6)
Jackson County 6 Urban 8.1 (6.5, 10.0) 6 (1, 35) 18 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.2, 7.1)
Isabella County 6 Rural 7.0 (4.3, 10.7) 16 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Iosco County 6 Rural 8.0 (4.5, 13.9) 7 (1, 47) 4 falling falling trend -27.7 (-67.9, -4.8)
Ionia County 6 Urban 5.5 (3.4, 8.4) 42 (4, 47) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 5.1)
Ingham County 6 Urban 7.0 (5.7, 8.5) 13 (4, 40) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.1)
Huron County 6 Rural 6.4 (3.8, 10.8) 25 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 6.0 (3.7, 9.5) 33 (2, 47) 4
*
*
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 4.6 (3.2, 6.5) 47 (17, 47) 7
*
*
Gladwin County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.6, 10.9) 30 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Genesee County 6 Urban 5.9 (5.1, 6.9) 34 (13, 44) 35 falling falling trend -5.8 (-24.7, -0.1)
Eaton County 6 Urban 6.8 (5.1, 9.0) 18 (3, 46) 11
*
*
Clinton County 6 Urban 6.4 (4.4, 9.1) 26 (3, 47) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 4.1)
Clare County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.3, 12.0) 12 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.6, 10.2) 31 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Cass County 6 Urban 6.7 (4.4, 10.0) 21 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Urban 7.0 (5.4, 9.0) 15 (3, 44) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 6.4)
Branch County 6 Rural 5.8 (3.5, 9.3) 37 (2, 47) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 6.4)
Berrien County 6 Urban 6.1 (4.7, 7.8) 32 (7, 47) 14 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.9)
Bay County 6 Urban 7.8 (5.9, 10.3) 9 (1, 41) 12 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.3, 8.6)
Barry County 6 Urban 5.8 (3.8, 8.7) 38 (4, 47) 5
*
*
Alpena County 6 Rural 7.4 (4.6, 12.1) 11 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Allegan County 6 Rural 6.3 (4.6, 8.4) 28 (5, 47) 10 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.8, 10.0)
Alcona County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 3:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alcona, Alger, Antrim, Arenac, Baraga, Benzie, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Delta, Dickinson, Emmet, Gogebic, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Lake, Leelanau, Luce, Mackinac, Manistee, Mason, Menominee, Missaukee, Montmorency, Oceana, Ogemaw, Ontonagon, Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Presque Isle, Sanilac, Schoolcraft, Wexford

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top