Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Michigan 5 *** 62.9 (62.2, 63.5) N/A 8,073 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Montcalm County 6 *** 72.8 (64.8, 81.5) 20 (4, 57) 63 stable stable trend 8.9 (-3.4, 22.9)
Wexford County 6 *** 72.8 (62.2, 85.0) 19 (3, 66) 35 stable stable trend 5.6 (-12.1, 26.7)
Livingston County 6 *** 51.0 (47.0, 55.4) 76 (58, 80) 123 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.2, 8.8)
Oscoda County 6 *** 84.2 (64.3, 110.2) 4 (1, 72) 13 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.5, 5.9)
Gratiot County 6 *** 75.5 (65.2, 87.1) 16 (2, 59) 40 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Hillsdale County 6 *** 78.2 (68.5, 89.0) 12 (2, 54) 50 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Oceana County 6 *** 68.1 (56.7, 81.5) 37 (4, 76) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.8)
Arenac County 6 *** 98.3 (81.4, 118.4) 2 (1, 30) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Mecosta County 6 *** 75.9 (65.9, 87.1) 14 (2, 58) 44 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Dickinson County 6 *** 67.0 (56.1, 79.8) 40 (6, 76) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
Huron County 6 *** 65.3 (55.5, 76.7) 45 (8, 76) 35 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Lapeer County 6 *** 70.0 (63.3, 77.2) 27 (7, 58) 86 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Osceola County 6 *** 81.7 (68.5, 97.1) 7 (1, 56) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Gogebic County 6 *** 64.6 (51.5, 80.9) 47 (4, 79) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.6)
Ionia County 6 *** 68.9 (60.6, 78.2) 33 (6, 65) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.5)
Shiawassee County 6 *** 75.7 (68.0, 84.2) 15 (3, 50) 72 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.6)
Allegan County 6 *** 58.9 (53.4, 64.8) 61 (34, 76) 89 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.6)
Schoolcraft County 6 *** 109.6 (85.3, 140.5) 1 (1, 33) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Delta County 6 *** 69.6 (60.3, 80.3) 29 (5, 69) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Lake County 6 *** 81.7 (64.5, 103.3) 8 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Cass County 6 *** 71.3 (62.9, 80.6) 26 (5, 59) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Ogemaw County 6 *** 84.1 (71.2, 99.4) 5 (1, 53) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Sanilac County 6 *** 63.8 (55.0, 73.7) 49 (10, 75) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Barry County 6 *** 57.8 (50.7, 65.7) 64 (28, 79) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Gladwin County 6 *** 80.7 (69.4, 93.9) 9 (1, 52) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Roscommon County 6 *** 88.2 (75.8, 102.7) 3 (1, 35) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Menominee County 6 *** 60.6 (50.2, 73.1) 54 (10, 79) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.9)
Missaukee County 6 *** 80.0 (64.1, 99.3) 10 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.7)
Tuscola County 6 *** 67.0 (59.1, 75.8) 39 (7, 69) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Berrien County 6 *** 72.1 (67.1, 77.4) 22 (8, 47) 161 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Kalkaska County 6 *** 76.9 (62.2, 94.6) 13 (1, 72) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Alpena County 6 *** 69.3 (58.8, 81.5) 31 (4, 72) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Newaygo County 6 *** 72.2 (63.4, 82.0) 21 (4, 60) 51 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Chippewa County 6 *** 65.9 (56.1, 77.1) 42 (7, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Clare County 6 *** 82.1 (71.0, 94.9) 6 (1, 47) 43 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Clinton County 6 *** 43.0 (37.3, 49.5) 80 (70, 82) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Midland County 6 *** 53.2 (47.3, 59.7) 73 (46, 80) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Benzie County 6 *** 58.8 (46.5, 74.1) 62 (8, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Eaton County 6 *** 56.3 (50.9, 62.2) 67 (42, 78) 83 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Grand Traverse County 6 *** 58.9 (53.1, 65.3) 60 (31, 77) 77 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Houghton County 6 *** 54.4 (44.8, 65.5) 69 (25, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Muskegon County 6 *** 68.2 (63.4, 73.4) 36 (13, 56) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Iosco County 6 *** 75.1 (63.7, 88.4) 17 (2, 63) 36 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Lenawee County 6 *** 58.0 (52.4, 64.2) 63 (35, 77) 80 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Monroe County 6 *** 59.9 (55.2, 65.1) 57 (36, 73) 122 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Ontonagon County 6 *** 79.1 (56.9, 112.5) 11 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.5, 3.1)
Branch County 6 *** 68.7 (59.4, 79.1) 35 (5, 70) 41 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Kent County 6 *** 54.1 (51.6, 56.7) 71 (57, 77) 372 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Van Buren County 6 *** 68.7 (61.4, 76.7) 34 (8, 63) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Crawford County 6 *** 69.5 (55.8, 86.7) 30 (2, 77) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.9)
Ingham County 6 *** 54.2 (50.3, 58.2) 70 (52, 78) 157 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Iron County 6 *** 62.1 (48.6, 80.0) 52 (5, 81) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7)
Saginaw County 6 *** 64.0 (59.7, 68.5) 48 (25, 64) 175 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Bay County 6 *** 67.9 (62.1, 74.2) 38 (12, 61) 105 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Genesee County 6 *** 72.0 (68.8, 75.3) 24 (10, 41) 391 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Luce County 6 *** 65.8 (44.1, 96.1) 43 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.3, 2.3)
Manistee County 6 *** 61.2 (51.0, 73.2) 53 (10, 79) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Otsego County 6 *** 59.3 (48.0, 72.6) 58 (10, 81) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Marquette County 6 *** 62.4 (55.1, 70.6) 51 (18, 76) 56 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Isabella County 6 *** 60.4 (52.1, 69.7) 56 (14, 77) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Ottawa County 6 *** 39.8 (36.7, 43.1) 81 (77, 82) 126 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Washtenaw County 6 *** 48.2 (45.1, 51.6) 78 (69, 81) 182 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Montmorency County 6 *** 70.0 (53.7, 92.1) 28 (2, 79) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.8)
Calhoun County 6 *** 69.2 (63.8, 75.1) 32 (11, 56) 123 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Kalamazoo County 6 *** 56.3 (52.4, 60.3) 68 (48, 76) 165 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
St. Clair County 6 *** 64.7 (60.0, 69.7) 46 (21, 64) 145 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 66.7 (58.8, 75.4) 41 (9, 71) 54 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Alcona County 6 *** 65.4 (51.9, 84.3) 44 (4, 80) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.2)
Jackson County 6 *** 71.7 (66.6, 77.2) 25 (8, 49) 152 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Antrim County 6 *** 54.0 (44.4, 65.7) 72 (23, 81) 23 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Mackinac County 6 *** 56.6 (42.0, 76.1) 66 (6, 82) 12 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.4)
Oakland County 7 *** 56.8 (55.1, 58.5) 65 (53, 72) 901 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Presque Isle County 6 *** 50.5 (38.3, 66.8) 77 (20, 82) 14 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.7)
Mason County 6 *** 60.6 (50.9, 71.9) 55 (11, 79) 29 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Wayne County 7 *** 72.0 (70.4, 73.7) 23 (14, 36) 1,510 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1)
Macomb County 7 *** 74.1 (71.8, 76.4) 18 (10, 32) 827 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.6, 0.2)
Emmet County 6 *** 52.5 (43.9, 62.5) 75 (34, 82) 28 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.3)
Alger County 6 *** 59.3 (43.4, 80.8) 59 (4, 82) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -0.9)
Leelanau County 6 *** 39.1 (30.7, 50.0) 82 (65, 82) 17 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.9, 0.3)
Baraga County 6 *** 43.2 (28.5, 64.2) 79 (25, 82) 6 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.9, -0.8)
Charlevoix County 6 *** 53.0 (43.3, 64.7) 74 (31, 82) 23 stable stable trend -15.3 (-33.6, 8.0)
Cheboygan County 6 *** 63.5 (53.1, 75.9) 50 (8, 78) 29 stable stable trend -25.1 (-46.1, 4.1)
Keweenaw County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2021 9:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top