Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 58.8 (58.3, 59.4) N/A 8,012 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Wexford County 6 Rural 67.2 (57.2, 78.6) 25 (5, 65) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-14.2, -0.9)
Wayne County 6 Urban 66.8 (65.2, 68.4) 26 (17, 36) 1,466 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.4)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 43.3 (40.4, 46.3) 79 (69, 80) 175 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 63.5 (56.8, 70.8) 32 (11, 60) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 59.4 (52.2, 67.5) 46 (16, 71) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 63.0 (55.4, 71.3) 34 (11, 67) 53 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 65.1 (60.5, 70.1) 31 (14, 50) 155 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 61.3 (54.5, 68.9) 36 (14, 66) 61 falling falling trend -9.3 (-31.9, -0.4)
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural 75.6 (56.9, 100.7) 12 (1, 72) 12 falling falling trend -33.3 (-45.7, -20.3)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 62.8 (54.3, 72.4) 35 (9, 70) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 60.8 (56.7, 65.1) 38 (23, 57) 172 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 79.2 (68.0, 92.6) 8 (1, 38) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 44.5 (33.5, 59.5) 76 (32, 82) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.5)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 37.5 (34.6, 40.5) 81 (76, 82) 131 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Otsego County 6 Rural 53.4 (43.3, 65.6) 58 (16, 81) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 85.1 (63.1, 113.8) 5 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Osceola County 6 Rural 76.3 (64.0, 90.8) 11 (1, 51) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.2)
Ontonagon County 6 Rural 46.8 (31.5, 74.1) 73 (10, 82) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 0.9)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 71.5 (60.1, 85.2) 16 (3, 58) 30 falling falling trend -11.8 (-24.2, -2.4)
Oceana County 6 Rural 45.3 (36.5, 55.9) 74 (39, 82) 19 falling falling trend -20.4 (-29.4, -7.4)
Oakland County 6 Urban 51.1 (49.6, 52.7) 64 (54, 72) 870 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -2.3)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 70.9 (62.5, 80.3) 18 (5, 49) 54 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 44.1 (40.4, 48.2) 77 (64, 80) 106 falling falling trend -25.7 (-33.5, -21.2)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 75.0 (56.8, 99.2) 13 (1, 72) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.9)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 77.2 (69.2, 86.0) 9 (2, 36) 70 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.6, 1.5)
Monroe County 6 Urban 51.1 (46.8, 55.6) 65 (45, 76) 113 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.5, -3.4)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 66.3 (52.0, 83.8) 28 (3, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
Midland County 6 Urban 58.6 (52.6, 65.2) 47 (19, 70) 71 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Menominee County 6 Rural 59.6 (49.1, 72.3) 44 (7, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.9)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 66.3 (57.0, 76.8) 27 (6, 62) 39 falling falling trend -4.8 (-11.9, -1.7)
Mason County 6 Rural 56.8 (47.4, 67.8) 51 (15, 78) 28 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Marquette County 6 Rural 51.6 (45.2, 58.9) 63 (33, 79) 49 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Manistee County 6 Rural 63.2 (53.3, 75.0) 33 (7, 72) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Macomb County 6 Urban 68.3 (66.2, 70.5) 23 (13, 33) 811 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 50.7 (36.0, 70.6) 67 (9, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.3)
Luce County 6 Rural 54.4 (34.4, 84.4) 57 (2, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.2)
Livingston County 6 Urban 53.0 (49.1, 57.3) 59 (41, 73) 142 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 50.3 (45.2, 55.9) 70 (44, 78) 74 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 30.7 (24.1, 39.5) 82 (76, 82) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.8)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 69.5 (63.1, 76.4) 21 (8, 45) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Lake County 6 Rural 92.7 (75.4, 114.2) 2 (1, 28) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Kent County 6 Urban 52.3 (50.0, 54.8) 61 (48, 72) 383 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 85.2 (70.1, 103.1) 4 (1, 45) 24 rising rising trend 11.3 (0.7, 21.0)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 54.8 (51.0, 58.7) 56 (37, 70) 166 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Jackson County 6 Urban 72.5 (67.4, 77.8) 15 (7, 33) 162 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.6, -0.6)
Isabella County 6 Rural 61.0 (52.7, 70.3) 37 (12, 73) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Iron County 6 Rural 69.9 (55.5, 88.6) 19 (2, 72) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.4)
Iosco County 6 Rural 77.0 (65.8, 90.2) 10 (1, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Ionia County 6 Urban 59.7 (52.2, 67.9) 43 (16, 72) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Ingham County 6 Urban 52.2 (48.5, 56.0) 62 (45, 74) 160 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Huron County 6 Rural 57.0 (48.2, 67.4) 50 (15, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Houghton County 6 Rural 48.6 (39.9, 58.8) 72 (32, 81) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 69.8 (61.0, 79.7) 20 (4, 55) 48 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 69.5 (59.8, 80.4) 22 (4, 55) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 50.3 (45.1, 56.0) 71 (44, 78) 72 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 54.9 (42.4, 70.8) 55 (10, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 100.3 (87.2, 115.3) 1 (1, 9) 48 rising rising trend 9.1 (2.1, 18.3)
Genesee County 6 Urban 59.6 (56.7, 62.6) 45 (30, 56) 337 falling falling trend -11.7 (-17.3, -7.4)
Emmet County 6 Rural 45.1 (37.3, 54.3) 75 (45, 82) 25 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.0)
Eaton County 6 Urban 55.6 (50.3, 61.4) 53 (29, 73) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 58.3 (48.1, 70.3) 48 (10, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.1)
Delta County 6 Rural 60.2 (51.9, 69.8) 40 (12, 73) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Crawford County 6 Rural 71.3 (57.2, 89.0) 17 (2, 68) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 2.0)
Clinton County 6 Urban 39.7 (34.4, 45.5) 80 (68, 82) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.6)
Clare County 6 Rural 83.3 (72.6, 95.5) 6 (1, 29) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 60.3 (51.1, 70.9) 39 (12, 74) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 50.4 (41.7, 61.1) 69 (28, 81) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.5)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 43.7 (35.3, 54.0) 78 (40, 82) 21 falling falling trend -10.1 (-27.2, -0.2)
Cass County 6 Urban 59.8 (52.3, 68.2) 42 (13, 70) 49 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.4)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 60.2 (55.2, 65.6) 41 (21, 62) 112 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Branch County 6 Rural 66.0 (57.2, 75.9) 29 (6, 64) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Berrien County 6 Urban 67.3 (62.6, 72.4) 24 (11, 45) 157 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Benzie County 6 Urban 56.1 (44.6, 70.5) 52 (11, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.6)
Bay County 6 Urban 65.7 (60.1, 71.7) 30 (12, 51) 106 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Barry County 6 Urban 52.4 (45.8, 59.7) 60 (31, 78) 48 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.2)
Baraga County 6 Rural 57.8 (40.3, 81.6) 49 (3, 82) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.0, -1.4)
Arenac County 6 Rural 91.8 (75.7, 111.3) 3 (1, 27) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.9)
Antrim County 6 Rural 50.9 (41.5, 62.4) 66 (22, 81) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Alpena County 6 Rural 79.5 (68.2, 92.6) 7 (1, 37) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Allegan County 6 Rural 50.4 (45.6, 55.7) 68 (45, 78) 83 stable stable trend -13.3 (-28.5, 0.5)
Alger County 6 Rural 55.0 (39.8, 76.2) 54 (5, 82) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 0.7)
Alcona County 6 Rural 72.7 (58.3, 92.4) 14 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 9:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Keweenaw

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top