Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 58.8 (58.3, 59.4) N/A 8,012 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Barry County 6 Urban 52.4 (45.8, 59.7) 60 (31, 78) 48 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.2)
Bay County 6 Urban 65.7 (60.1, 71.7) 30 (12, 51) 106 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Benzie County 6 Urban 56.1 (44.6, 70.5) 52 (11, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.6)
Berrien County 6 Urban 67.3 (62.6, 72.4) 24 (11, 45) 157 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 60.2 (55.2, 65.6) 41 (21, 62) 112 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Cass County 6 Urban 59.8 (52.3, 68.2) 42 (13, 70) 49 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.4)
Clinton County 6 Urban 39.7 (34.4, 45.5) 80 (68, 82) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.6)
Eaton County 6 Urban 55.6 (50.3, 61.4) 53 (29, 73) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Genesee County 6 Urban 59.6 (56.7, 62.6) 45 (30, 56) 337 falling falling trend -11.7 (-17.3, -7.4)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 50.3 (45.1, 56.0) 71 (44, 78) 72 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Ingham County 6 Urban 52.2 (48.5, 56.0) 62 (45, 74) 160 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Ionia County 6 Urban 59.7 (52.2, 67.9) 43 (16, 72) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Jackson County 6 Urban 72.5 (67.4, 77.8) 15 (7, 33) 162 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.6, -0.6)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 54.8 (51.0, 58.7) 56 (37, 70) 166 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 85.2 (70.1, 103.1) 4 (1, 45) 24 rising rising trend 11.3 (0.7, 21.0)
Kent County 6 Urban 52.3 (50.0, 54.8) 61 (48, 72) 383 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 69.5 (63.1, 76.4) 21 (8, 45) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 30.7 (24.1, 39.5) 82 (76, 82) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.8)
Livingston County 6 Urban 53.0 (49.1, 57.3) 59 (41, 73) 142 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Macomb County 6 Urban 68.3 (66.2, 70.5) 23 (13, 33) 811 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Midland County 6 Urban 58.6 (52.6, 65.2) 47 (19, 70) 71 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Monroe County 6 Urban 51.1 (46.8, 55.6) 65 (45, 76) 113 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.5, -3.4)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 77.2 (69.2, 86.0) 9 (2, 36) 70 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.6, 1.5)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 44.1 (40.4, 48.2) 77 (64, 80) 106 falling falling trend -25.7 (-33.5, -21.2)
Oakland County 6 Urban 51.1 (49.6, 52.7) 64 (54, 72) 870 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -2.3)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 37.5 (34.6, 40.5) 81 (76, 82) 131 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 60.8 (56.7, 65.1) 38 (23, 57) 172 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 65.1 (60.5, 70.1) 31 (14, 50) 155 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 43.3 (40.4, 46.3) 79 (69, 80) 175 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Wayne County 6 Urban 66.8 (65.2, 68.4) 26 (17, 36) 1,466 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.4)
Alcona County 6 Rural 72.7 (58.3, 92.4) 14 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
Alger County 6 Rural 55.0 (39.8, 76.2) 54 (5, 82) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 0.7)
Allegan County 6 Rural 50.4 (45.6, 55.7) 68 (45, 78) 83 stable stable trend -13.3 (-28.5, 0.5)
Alpena County 6 Rural 79.5 (68.2, 92.6) 7 (1, 37) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Antrim County 6 Rural 50.9 (41.5, 62.4) 66 (22, 81) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Arenac County 6 Rural 91.8 (75.7, 111.3) 3 (1, 27) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.9)
Baraga County 6 Rural 57.8 (40.3, 81.6) 49 (3, 82) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.0, -1.4)
Branch County 6 Rural 66.0 (57.2, 75.9) 29 (6, 64) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 43.7 (35.3, 54.0) 78 (40, 82) 21 falling falling trend -10.1 (-27.2, -0.2)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 50.4 (41.7, 61.1) 69 (28, 81) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.5)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 60.3 (51.1, 70.9) 39 (12, 74) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Clare County 6 Rural 83.3 (72.6, 95.5) 6 (1, 29) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Crawford County 6 Rural 71.3 (57.2, 89.0) 17 (2, 68) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 2.0)
Delta County 6 Rural 60.2 (51.9, 69.8) 40 (12, 73) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 58.3 (48.1, 70.3) 48 (10, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.1)
Emmet County 6 Rural 45.1 (37.3, 54.3) 75 (45, 82) 25 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.0)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 100.3 (87.2, 115.3) 1 (1, 9) 48 rising rising trend 9.1 (2.1, 18.3)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 54.9 (42.4, 70.8) 55 (10, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 69.5 (59.8, 80.4) 22 (4, 55) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 69.8 (61.0, 79.7) 20 (4, 55) 48 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Houghton County 6 Rural 48.6 (39.9, 58.8) 72 (32, 81) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Huron County 6 Rural 57.0 (48.2, 67.4) 50 (15, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Iosco County 6 Rural 77.0 (65.8, 90.2) 10 (1, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Iron County 6 Rural 69.9 (55.5, 88.6) 19 (2, 72) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.4)
Isabella County 6 Rural 61.0 (52.7, 70.3) 37 (12, 73) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Lake County 6 Rural 92.7 (75.4, 114.2) 2 (1, 28) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 50.3 (45.2, 55.9) 70 (44, 78) 74 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Luce County 6 Rural 54.4 (34.4, 84.4) 57 (2, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.2)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 50.7 (36.0, 70.6) 67 (9, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.3)
Manistee County 6 Rural 63.2 (53.3, 75.0) 33 (7, 72) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Marquette County 6 Rural 51.6 (45.2, 58.9) 63 (33, 79) 49 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Mason County 6 Rural 56.8 (47.4, 67.8) 51 (15, 78) 28 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 66.3 (57.0, 76.8) 27 (6, 62) 39 falling falling trend -4.8 (-11.9, -1.7)
Menominee County 6 Rural 59.6 (49.1, 72.3) 44 (7, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.9)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 66.3 (52.0, 83.8) 28 (3, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 75.0 (56.8, 99.2) 13 (1, 72) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.9)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 70.9 (62.5, 80.3) 18 (5, 49) 54 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Oceana County 6 Rural 45.3 (36.5, 55.9) 74 (39, 82) 19 falling falling trend -20.4 (-29.4, -7.4)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 71.5 (60.1, 85.2) 16 (3, 58) 30 falling falling trend -11.8 (-24.2, -2.4)
Ontonagon County 6 Rural 46.8 (31.5, 74.1) 73 (10, 82) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 0.9)
Osceola County 6 Rural 76.3 (64.0, 90.8) 11 (1, 51) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.2)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 85.1 (63.1, 113.8) 5 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Otsego County 6 Rural 53.4 (43.3, 65.6) 58 (16, 81) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 44.5 (33.5, 59.5) 76 (32, 82) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.5)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 79.2 (68.0, 92.6) 8 (1, 38) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 62.8 (54.3, 72.4) 35 (9, 70) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural 75.6 (56.9, 100.7) 12 (1, 72) 12 falling falling trend -33.3 (-45.7, -20.3)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 61.3 (54.5, 68.9) 36 (14, 66) 61 falling falling trend -9.3 (-31.9, -0.4)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 63.0 (55.4, 71.3) 34 (11, 67) 53 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 59.4 (52.2, 67.5) 46 (16, 71) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 63.5 (56.8, 70.8) 32 (11, 60) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Wexford County 6 Rural 67.2 (57.2, 78.6) 25 (5, 65) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-14.2, -0.9)
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 9:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top