Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 114.7 (113.6, 115.9) N/A 7,689 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 6.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Alcona County 6 Rural 68.2 (45.1, 103.8) 77 (21, 82) 8 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.6, -2.7)
Alger County 6 Rural 147.2 (111.9, 193.3) 1 (1, 56) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.7)
Allegan County 6 Rural 82.6 (73.7, 92.3) 65 (43, 77) 69 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.7, -4.7)
Alpena County 6 Rural 67.7 (53.7, 85.1) 78 (50, 82) 17 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.0, -2.3)
Antrim County 6 Rural 110.2 (92.1, 132.3) 29 (3, 68) 27 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 6.1)
Arenac County 6 Rural 102.9 (81.5, 130.4) 37 (3, 77) 17 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.2)
Baraga County 6 Rural 129.4 (94.2, 176.3) 10 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.3, 7.6)
Barry County 6 Urban 103.0 (89.8, 117.9) 36 (12, 66) 48 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.2)
Bay County 6 Urban 122.5 (111.5, 134.4) 14 (3, 35) 96 stable stable trend 5.6 (-2.7, 21.0)
Benzie County 6 Urban 142.0 (118.0, 171.2) 2 (1, 38) 26 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.1)
Berrien County 6 Urban 98.9 (90.6, 107.8) 42 (23, 60) 111 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.8, -3.5)
Branch County 6 Rural 95.7 (80.5, 113.1) 48 (14, 75) 30 stable stable trend 14.1 (-2.0, 41.4)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 106.4 (96.8, 116.7) 31 (13, 54) 95 rising rising trend 8.1 (2.9, 15.5)
Cass County 6 Urban 96.0 (83.0, 110.9) 47 (18, 72) 41 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.8)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 80.4 (64.7, 99.7) 67 (29, 81) 20 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.3, -1.2)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 86.2 (70.4, 105.6) 59 (21, 80) 23 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.6, -2.3)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 117.4 (99.4, 138.1) 19 (1, 56) 31 stable stable trend 23.0 (-1.1, 41.6)
Clare County 6 Rural 105.0 (88.4, 124.5) 33 (6, 69) 30 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.4, 17.1)
Clinton County 6 Urban 117.4 (104.5, 131.7) 18 (3, 48) 63 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.4)
Crawford County 6 Rural 85.0 (64.3, 113.0) 60 (16, 82) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.1, -2.6)
Delta County 6 Rural 133.6 (116.3, 153.4) 7 (1, 33) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.3)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 74.3 (59.1, 93.0) 72 (40, 82) 17 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.8)
Eaton County 6 Urban 120.8 (109.8, 132.7) 16 (4, 39) 94 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.6)
Emmet County 6 Rural 82.0 (67.4, 99.5) 66 (31, 81) 24 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.3, -1.7)
Genesee County 6 Urban 101.5 (96.0, 107.2) 39 (25, 54) 272 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 2.9)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 111.0 (93.0, 132.7) 27 (2, 65) 28 stable stable trend 6.4 (-3.5, 21.3)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 96.4 (75.1, 123.9) 46 (7, 79) 15 stable stable trend 2.4 (-8.9, 26.5)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 129.9 (118.0, 142.9) 9 (1, 29) 94 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.8, 10.3)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 121.6 (103.3, 142.4) 15 (1, 52) 32 rising rising trend 14.2 (3.6, 36.2)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 90.8 (76.8, 107.1) 54 (23, 76) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.3, 12.6)
Houghton County 6 Rural 90.7 (74.2, 110.2) 55 (15, 79) 22 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.7, 24.2)
Huron County 6 Rural 83.6 (68.9, 101.2) 62 (26, 80) 24 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.0, -4.2)
Ingham County 6 Urban 111.9 (104.3, 120.0) 23 (12, 43) 170 falling falling trend -4.9 (-20.2, -2.1)
Ionia County 6 Urban 94.2 (81.0, 109.0) 49 (21, 74) 39 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.1)
Iosco County 6 Rural 92.1 (75.8, 112.2) 52 (13, 78) 25 stable stable trend 8.0 (-0.3, 28.0)
Iron County 6 Rural 74.4 (54.4, 103.4) 71 (23, 82) 10 stable stable trend 9.0 (-2.3, 30.9)
Isabella County 6 Rural 111.5 (95.0, 130.1) 26 (3, 62) 35 rising rising trend 16.5 (8.5, 28.7)
Jackson County 6 Urban 125.2 (115.8, 135.2) 13 (3, 30) 139 rising rising trend 14.7 (1.8, 22.7)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 104.5 (97.1, 112.3) 34 (18, 51) 156 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.5, -0.4)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 105.7 (83.0, 133.9) 32 (2, 77) 16 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -0.1)
Kent County 6 Urban 84.7 (80.4, 89.3) 61 (50, 71) 305 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 2.3)
Lake County 6 Rural 67.1 (48.5, 93.5) 81 (36, 82) 9 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -1.7)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 92.2 (81.9, 103.7) 51 (26, 72) 63 falling falling trend -6.9 (-16.3, -5.0)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 136.0 (114.9, 161.4) 5 (1, 40) 34 stable stable trend 5.1 (-5.7, 20.5)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 103.2 (92.6, 114.7) 35 (17, 59) 74 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 7.7)
Livingston County 6 Urban 111.8 (103.8, 120.3) 25 (12, 45) 159 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -1.9)
Luce County 6 Rural 67.2 (39.6, 113.3) 80 (12, 82) 4 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.6, 1.1)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 99.9 (75.1, 133.8) 40 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend 13.9 (-2.9, 38.1)
Macomb County 6 Urban 127.1 (122.9, 131.5) 11 (5, 20) 726 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.4, 11.5)
Manistee County 6 Rural 91.3 (74.5, 111.8) 53 (16, 79) 22 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.8, -2.8)
Marquette County 6 Rural 111.9 (99.1, 126.1) 24 (6, 54) 59 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.3, 15.0)
Mason County 6 Rural 98.7 (81.7, 118.9) 43 (9, 76) 26 stable stable trend 9.5 (-2.8, 18.9)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 69.0 (55.1, 85.7) 76 (49, 82) 19 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.2, -3.4)
Menominee County 6 Rural 80.0 (63.9, 100.0) 68 (25, 82) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 2.0)
Midland County 6 Urban 116.9 (104.6, 130.4) 20 (4, 48) 68 stable stable trend 6.4 (-4.1, 26.0)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 92.8 (70.1, 122.0) 50 (7, 81) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.4)
Monroe County 6 Urban 88.3 (80.4, 96.9) 58 (37, 72) 98 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.1)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 73.8 (63.1, 85.9) 74 (48, 82) 36 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.5, -3.8)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 76.6 (51.4, 114.5) 70 (12, 82) 7 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -2.0)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 83.5 (76.0, 91.5) 63 (45, 76) 98 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.2, -4.6)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 74.1 (62.3, 87.8) 73 (47, 82) 30 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.2, -3.2)
Oakland County 6 Urban 140.3 (136.6, 144.1) 4 (1, 9) 1,167 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.0, 11.8)
Oceana County 6 Rural 67.6 (52.9, 85.8) 79 (49, 82) 15 stable stable trend 8.0 (-10.4, 22.5)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 113.6 (93.4, 138.4) 22 (1, 67) 24 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.8)
Ontonagon County 6 Rural 89.4 (62.7, 139.1) 57 (3, 82) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.1)
Osceola County 6 Rural 52.6 (38.7, 70.8) 82 (66, 82) 10 falling falling trend -32.6 (-50.4, -23.2)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 102.2 (73.2, 143.6) 38 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.2)
Otsego County 6 Rural 110.9 (90.7, 135.1) 28 (1, 68) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.6)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 90.6 (84.1, 97.4) 56 (37, 69) 154 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -2.7)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 69.9 (51.0, 97.1) 75 (32, 82) 11 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.1, -2.5)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 109.8 (92.5, 131.4) 30 (3, 66) 33 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -2.1)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 140.8 (131.7, 150.4) 3 (1, 13) 187 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.9, 9.9)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 117.8 (101.5, 136.5) 17 (2, 54) 39 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.2)
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural 82.6 (55.7, 123.1) 64 (7, 82) 7 stable stable trend 5.3 (-6.6, 27.2)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 130.7 (116.2, 146.8) 8 (1, 32) 62 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.0, 11.4)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 114.6 (105.9, 123.8) 21 (9, 42) 139 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 78.7 (66.9, 92.1) 69 (41, 80) 33 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.9)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 99.4 (86.3, 114.3) 41 (14, 70) 43 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.4, 12.5)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 98.2 (86.3, 111.4) 44 (18, 68) 54 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.4, -2.8)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 125.2 (118.2, 132.5) 12 (5, 25) 253 stable stable trend 0.3 (-9.6, 9.7)
Wayne County 6 Urban 135.9 (132.6, 139.2) 6 (1, 11) 1,435 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 6.5)
Wexford County 6 Rural 98.1 (81.3, 117.9) 45 (10, 75) 25 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.8, -4.0)
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/14/2025 12:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top