Return to Home Incidence > Table > Interpret

Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Bladder (Late Stage^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

Explanation of Column Headers

Objective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.

Percent of Cases with Late Stage - This is the number of late stages cases compared to the number of cases for all stages.

Other Notes

Line by Line Interpretation of the Report



Bay County6

Berrien County6

Calhoun County6

Delta County6

Eaton County6

Genesee County6

Ingham County6

Jackson County6

Kalamazoo County6

Kent County6

Lenawee County6

Livingston County6

Macomb County6

Midland County6

Monroe County6

Muskegon County6

Oakland County6

Ottawa County6

Saginaw County6

Shiawassee County6

St. Clair County6

Van Buren County6

Washtenaw County6

Wayne County6

Alcona County6 Alger County6 Allegan County6 Alpena County6 Antrim County6 Arenac County6 Baraga County6 Barry County6 Benzie County6 Branch County6 Cass County6 Charlevoix County6 Cheboygan County6 Chippewa County6 Clare County6 Clinton County6 Crawford County6 Dickinson County6 Emmet County6 Gladwin County6 Gogebic County6 Grand Traverse County6 Gratiot County6 Hillsdale County6 Houghton County6 Huron County6 Ionia County6 Iosco County6 Iron County6 Isabella County6 Kalkaska County6 Keweenaw County6 Lake County6 Lapeer County6 Leelanau County6 Luce County6 Mackinac County6 Manistee County6 Marquette County6 Mason County6 Mecosta County6 Menominee County6 Missaukee County6 Montcalm County6 Montmorency County6 Newaygo County6 Oceana County6 Ogemaw County6 Ontonagon County6 Osceola County6 Oscoda County6 Otsego County6 Presque Isle County6 Roscommon County6 Sanilac County6 Schoolcraft County6 St. Joseph County6 Tuscola County6 Wexford County6

Created by on 07/14/2024 8:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alcona, Alger, Allegan, Alpena, Antrim, Arenac, Baraga, Barry, Benzie, Branch, Cass, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Clare, Clinton, Crawford, Dickinson, Emmet, Gladwin, Gogebic, Grand Traverse, Gratiot, Hillsdale, Houghton, Huron, Ionia, Iosco, Iron, Isabella, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Lake, Lapeer, Leelanau, Luce, Mackinac, Manistee, Marquette, Mason, Mecosta, Menominee, Missaukee, Montcalm, Montmorency, Newaygo, Oceana, Ogemaw, Ontonagon, Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Presque Isle, Roscommon, Sanilac, Schoolcraft, St. Joseph, Tuscola, Wexford

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.

^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.