Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 6.1 (5.9, 6.3) N/A 712 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.9, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.3 (6.3, 6.3) N/A 22,899 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.3)
Allegan County 6 Rural 7.0 (5.1, 9.5) 14 (1, 37) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.0, 7.4)
Alpena County 6 Rural 9.2 (4.9, 15.9) 1 (1, 40) 3 stable stable trend 14.3 (-2.2, 43.9)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 6.3 (3.7, 10.2) 20 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Huron County 6 Rural 7.4 (3.9, 12.7) 9 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Lenawee County 6 Rural 7.8 (5.5, 10.7) 3 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 6.9)
Marquette County 6 Rural 7.7 (5.1, 11.2) 5 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Mecosta County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.3, 12.1) 8 (1, 40) 4 falling falling trend -31.6 (-53.2, -2.9)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 7.0 (4.2, 11.1) 15 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 5.9)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 7.9 (4.5, 12.8) 2 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.2, 1.5)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.9, 10.9) 7 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.7, 2.5)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 4.4 (2.4, 7.4) 35 (5, 40) 3 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.4, 1.7)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 5.7 (3.2, 9.5) 28 (1, 40) 3 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.5, 0.8)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 5.6 (3.5, 8.5) 30 (2, 40) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.1, 3.2)
Barry County 6 Urban 4.3 (2.5, 7.0) 37 (8, 40) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.0, -2.0)
Bay County 6 Urban 5.7 (3.9, 8.0) 29 (3, 40) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 0.9)
Berrien County 6 Urban 5.6 (4.1, 7.5) 31 (5, 39) 10 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.7, -2.3)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 5.3 (3.8, 7.2) 33 (6, 40) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.1)
Cass County 6 Urban 3.8 (2.1, 6.6) 38 (12, 40) 3 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.8, -0.1)
Clinton County 6 Urban 7.7 (5.3, 10.8) 6 (1, 37) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.3)
Eaton County 6 Urban 4.4 (2.9, 6.5) 36 (11, 40) 6 falling falling trend -4.5 (-9.0, -0.5)
Genesee County 6 Urban 6.1 (5.1, 7.2) 23 (6, 35) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 5.8 (3.9, 8.4) 27 (2, 40) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.5)
Ingham County 6 Urban 7.1 (5.7, 8.6) 13 (2, 32) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.2)
Ionia County 6 Urban 5.9 (3.6, 9.1) 26 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 Urban 7.2 (5.6, 9.3) 10 (1, 34) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 0.9)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 6.1 (4.8, 7.6) 22 (4, 36) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Kent County 6 Urban 6.5 (5.7, 7.5) 18 (5, 31) 45 falling falling trend -13.5 (-23.5, -1.1)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 3.4 (2.1, 5.4) 40 (23, 40) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.0, 4.3)
Livingston County 6 Urban 6.7 (5.3, 8.5) 17 (2, 35) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.8)
Macomb County 6 Urban 6.5 (5.8, 7.2) 19 (6, 30) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Midland County 6 Urban 6.9 (4.7, 10.0) 16 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 4.0)
Monroe County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.5, 8.0) 24 (3, 38) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.3)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 7.1 (4.7, 10.5) 11 (1, 39) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.2)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 3.7 (2.6, 5.2) 39 (26, 40) 7 falling falling trend -35.6 (-51.9, -15.8)
Oakland County 6 Urban 7.1 (6.5, 7.7) 12 (4, 23) 106 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.8, 7.4) 25 (6, 37) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.3)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 5.4 (4.1, 7.0) 32 (7, 39) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.1, 2.6)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 7.7 (5.9, 9.9) 4 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 6.2 (5.1, 7.5) 21 (5, 35) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Wayne County 6 Urban 5.2 (4.7, 5.7) 34 (22, 37) 104 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Alcona County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 2:04 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alcona, Alger, Antrim, Arenac, Baraga, Benzie, Branch, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Clare, Crawford, Delta, Dickinson, Emmet, Gladwin, Gogebic, Gratiot, Houghton, Iosco, Iron, Isabella, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Lake, Leelanau, Luce, Mackinac, Manistee, Mason, Menominee, Missaukee, Montmorency, Oceana, Ogemaw, Ontonagon, Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Presque Isle, Roscommon, Schoolcraft, Wexford

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top