Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 18.8 # (18.4, 19.1) 2,070 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.8, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 20.3 (20.2, 20.3) 68,242 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Emmet County 6,10 37.0 # (28.7, 47.0) 15 falling falling trend -25.1 (-41.8, -3.6)
Grand Traverse County 6,10 33.8 # (28.8, 39.5) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-33.4, 47.3)
Benzie County 6,10 32.7 # (22.7, 46.0) 8 stable stable trend 13.5 (-25.7, 73.5)
Leelanau County 6,10 28.2 # (19.2, 40.2) 9 stable stable trend -16.6 (-43.0, 21.9)
Charlevoix County 6,10 27.7 # (20.0, 37.6) 10 stable stable trend -30.4 (-52.1, 1.2)
Kalkaska County 6,10 27.2 # (17.4, 40.8) 5 stable stable trend 11.4 (-31.3, 80.4)
Montmorency County 6,10 26.6 # (14.6, 45.6) 4 stable stable trend -9.0 (-60.7, 110.7)
Otsego County 6,10 25.4 # (17.3, 36.0) 7 falling falling trend -22.0 (-32.1, -10.3)
Livingston County 6,10 25.1 # (22.0, 28.6) 51 stable stable trend -5.2 (-19.0, 10.9)
Ottawa County 6,10 24.9 # (22.2, 27.7) 67 stable stable trend 1.5 (-19.4, 27.7)
Alpena County 6,10 24.4 # (17.8, 33.0) 10 stable stable trend -5.4 (-44.5, 61.3)
Osceola County 6,10 24.1 # (16.5, 34.3) 7 stable stable trend 31.5 (-6.9, 85.6)
Huron County 6,10 24.0 # (17.2, 32.7) 10 stable stable trend 12.6 (-13.2, 46.0)
Lapeer County 6,10 23.9 # (19.7, 28.8) 24 stable stable trend -12.2 (-27.2, 5.9)
Washtenaw County 6,10 23.7 # (21.4, 26.2) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-22.5, 26.8)
Kent County 6,10 23.6 # (21.9, 25.4) 142 stable stable trend 3.0 (-24.5, 40.3)
St. Clair County 6,10 23.6 # (20.4, 27.1) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-10.6, 12.1)
Jackson County 6,10 23.4 # (20.4, 26.9) 44 stable stable trend 1.2 (-13.5, 18.3)
Roscommon County 6,10 23.2 # (15.5, 33.8) 8 stable stable trend -7.9 (-36.7, 34.1)
Shiawassee County 6,10 23.0 # (18.4, 28.4) 18 stable stable trend -16.1 (-30.9, 1.9)
Ingham County 6,10 22.8 # (20.2, 25.6) 61 stable stable trend -4.5 (-23.3, 18.8)
Gladwin County 6,10 22.0 # (15.6, 30.6) 9 stable stable trend -6.3 (-22.7, 13.6)
Mackinac County 6,10 21.3 # (11.4, 37.2) 3
*
*
Tuscola County 6,10 21.2 # (16.4, 27.0) 14 falling falling trend -20.9 (-30.7, -9.7)
Eaton County 6,10 21.1 # (17.5, 25.3) 25 stable stable trend 4.1 (-25.6, 45.7)
Wexford County 6,10 21.1 # (14.9, 29.0) 8 stable stable trend 10.6 (-26.2, 65.7)
Oakland County 7,8 21.1 (20.0, 22.2) 289 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Antrim County 6,10 20.7 # (14.1, 29.6) 8 stable stable trend 17.4 (-6.1, 46.8)
Cheboygan County 6,10 20.5 # (13.9, 29.4) 7 stable stable trend 11.5 (-39.8, 106.7)
Midland County 6,10 20.5 # (16.5, 25.1) 20 stable stable trend -9.0 (-28.7, 16.2)
Clinton County 6,10 20.4 # (16.1, 25.5) 16 stable stable trend -10.5 (-30.5, 15.4)
Allegan County 6,10 20.0 # (16.6, 24.0) 25 falling falling trend -20.1 (-30.5, -8.1)
Berrien County 6,10 20.0 # (17.1, 23.2) 37 falling falling trend -19.5 (-27.2, -11.0)
Genesee County 6,10 19.6 # (17.8, 21.6) 92 stable stable trend -2.7 (-14.1, 10.3)
Lenawee County 6,10 19.5 # (15.9, 23.6) 22 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.1, 21.9)
Branch County 6,10 19.4 # (14.2, 25.8) 10 falling falling trend -18.5 (-31.1, -3.7)
Oceana County 6,10 19.3 # (13.2, 27.6) 7 falling falling trend -13.6 (-20.6, -6.0)
Kalamazoo County 6,10 19.0 # (16.6, 21.6) 48 stable stable trend -3.2 (-20.3, 17.6)
Macomb County 7,8 19.0 (17.7, 20.3) 182 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Bay County 6,10 18.9 # (15.5, 22.8) 24 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.6, 25.8)
Muskegon County 6,10 18.8 # (16.1, 21.8) 36 falling falling trend -11.1 (-18.5, -3.1)
Chippewa County 6,10 18.8 # (13.4, 25.8) 8 falling falling trend -27.1 (-42.4, -7.8)
Newaygo County 6,10 18.7 # (13.9, 24.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-37.0, 58.2)
Isabella County 6,10 18.7 # (14.0, 24.4) 11 falling falling trend -20.7 (-27.3, -13.5)
Manistee County 6,10 18.0 # (12.0, 26.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-31.3, 50.3)
Montcalm County 6,10 17.8 # (13.7, 22.8) 13 stable stable trend -13.6 (-46.3, 39.0)
Arenac County 6,10 17.6 # (10.9, 27.7) 4 stable stable trend 27.2 (-9.0, 77.7)
Missaukee County 6,10 17.4 # (9.6, 29.3) 3
*
*
Mecosta County 6,10 17.2 # (12.4, 23.5) 9 stable stable trend 4.4 (-12.0, 23.9)
Ionia County 6,10 17.1 # (12.9, 22.3) 12 stable stable trend 18.9 (-8.6, 54.6)
Cass County 6,10 17.0 # (12.5, 22.7) 10 stable stable trend 6.2 (-44.3, 102.4)
Monroe County 6,10 16.2 # (13.6, 19.3) 29 stable stable trend -6.8 (-36.1, 35.9)
Menominee County 6,10 16.1 # (10.2, 24.5) 5
*
*
Clare County 6,10 16.0 # (10.8, 23.1) 7 stable stable trend -29.6 (-61.9, 30.1)
Marquette County 6,10 15.7 # (11.9, 20.5) 12 stable stable trend 13.9 (-26.4, 76.3)
Calhoun County 6,10 15.7 # (13.0, 18.8) 25 falling falling trend -12.0 (-19.5, -3.8)
Ogemaw County 6,10 15.4 # (9.8, 23.6) 5 stable stable trend 4.4 (-37.5, 74.3)
Barry County 6,10 15.4 # (11.4, 20.4) 11 stable stable trend -20.2 (-49.4, 25.9)
Houghton County 6,10 15.3 # (9.7, 22.8) 5 stable stable trend -6.5 (-24.0, 15.2)
Delta County 6,10 14.7 # (10.0, 21.1) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-31.5, 46.2)
Gratiot County 6,10 14.7 # (10.2, 20.6) 7 stable stable trend 15.4 (-26.1, 80.2)
Sanilac County 6,10 14.5 # (10.1, 20.4) 8 stable stable trend -5.4 (-31.2, 30.0)
Hillsdale County 6,10 14.3 # (10.2, 19.7) 8 stable stable trend 24.2 (-24.1, 103.2)
Iosco County 6,10 14.3 # (9.6, 21.2) 6 falling falling trend -13.7 (-23.0, -3.4)
St. Joseph County 6,10 14.1 # (10.3, 18.8) 10 stable stable trend -5.2 (-18.5, 10.3)
Van Buren County 6,10 13.7 # (10.3, 18.0) 11 stable stable trend -13.3 (-39.8, 24.9)
Saginaw County 6,10 13.4 # (11.3, 15.7) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.4, 8.2)
Wayne County 7,8 11.4 (10.7, 12.1) 220 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Dickinson County 6,10 9.4 # (5.4, 15.7) 4 stable stable trend 39.7 (-52.3, 308.9)
Mason County 6,10 8.4 # (5.0, 13.7) 4 stable stable trend -9.7 (-76.0, 240.1)
Alcona County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/01/2016 3:07 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top