Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Cervix, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 6.8 # (6.5, 7.2) 351 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.2, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.6 (7.5, 7.7) 12,404 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Wayne County 7,8 9.0 (8.1, 9.9) 86 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Oakland County 7,8 5.7 (4.9, 6.6) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Macomb County 7,8 6.6 (5.6, 7.8) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Genesee County 6,10 8.7 # (7.0, 10.7) 19 stable stable trend 7.1 (-23.0, 48.8)
Kent County 6,10 5.9 # (4.7, 7.3) 17 stable stable trend -13.2 (-26.4, 2.4)
Ingham County 6,10 9.9 # (7.5, 12.7) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-21.5, 24.6)
Washtenaw County 6,10 4.8 # (3.4, 6.6) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-59.9, 144.1)
Kalamazoo County 6,10 6.0 # (4.2, 8.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-24.6, 32.8)
Ottawa County 6,10 5.9 # (4.1, 8.2) 7 stable stable trend -17.6 (-34.8, 4.0)
Calhoun County 6,10 9.7 # (6.6, 13.6) 7 stable stable trend -9.1 (-28.7, 15.9)
St. Clair County 6,10 7.3 # (4.9, 10.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-38.5, 63.4)
Berrien County 6,10 6.6 # (4.2, 9.7) 5 stable stable trend -13.3 (-36.7, 18.7)
Livingston County 6,10 5.9 # (3.8, 8.6) 5 stable stable trend -15.2 (-40.2, 20.3)
Eaton County 6,10 10.0 # (6.4, 14.7) 5 stable stable trend -8.6 (-46.6, 56.4)
Muskegon County 6,10 6.3 # (4.0, 9.3) 5 stable stable trend -13.8 (-29.4, 5.3)
Saginaw County 6,10 5.0 # (3.1, 7.4) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-39.8, 63.5)
Jackson County 6,10 6.5 # (4.1, 9.7) 5 stable stable trend 6.4 (-19.6, 40.9)
Monroe County 6,10 6.3 # (4.0, 9.5) 5 stable stable trend -18.3 (-47.2, 26.5)
Lenawee County 6,10 7.6 # (4.5, 12.1) 4 stable stable trend 6.9 (-42.7, 99.2)
Lapeer County 6,10 8.3 # (4.8, 13.4) 3
*
*
Allegan County 6,10 5.4 # (3.0, 9.0) 3
*
*
Alcona County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand Traverse County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hillsdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Midland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montcalm County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shiawassee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Joseph County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/27/2016 5:06 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top