Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 12.8 (12.4, 13.2) N/A 899 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.7, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 23.6 (15.1, 36.1) 2 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.6, 9.3)
Anoka County 6 Urban 13.1 (11.5, 14.7) 31 (14, 44) 56 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.5)
Becker County 6 Rural 14.2 (9.9, 19.9) 23 (3, 53) 8
*
*
Beltrami County 6 Rural 14.4 (10.2, 19.9) 20 (2, 52) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.1)
Benton County 6 Urban 11.6 (7.4, 17.3) 41 (6, 54) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.1)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 9.6 (6.5, 13.5) 51 (17, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.3)
Brown County 6 Rural 13.1 (8.3, 19.9) 30 (3, 54) 5 falling falling trend -35.7 (-57.6, -6.0)
Carlton County 6 Urban 16.7 (11.9, 22.9) 11 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.4, 9.5)
Carver County 6 Urban 10.9 (8.3, 14.1) 48 (15, 54) 13 falling falling trend -12.6 (-21.8, -0.2)
Cass County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.5, 22.6) 14 (2, 52) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 15.2)
Chisago County 6 Urban 15.6 (11.6, 20.5) 15 (2, 50) 11 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 8.3)
Clay County 6 Urban 17.6 (13.3, 22.8) 7 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.9)
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 25.3 (13.4, 43.2) 1 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 11.3 (8.4, 14.9) 44 (12, 54) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.5)
Dakota County 6 Urban 11.8 (10.5, 13.3) 39 (22, 49) 63 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.6)
Dodge County 6 Urban 12.6 (7.1, 20.9) 33 (2, 54) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.7, 5.0)
Douglas County 6 Rural 12.2 (8.2, 17.6) 37 (5, 54) 7 stable stable trend 28.7 (-9.1, 60.3)
Faribault County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.2, 26.1) 16 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Fillmore County 6 Urban 14.4 (8.9, 22.3) 22 (2, 54) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.2, 9.3)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.4, 17.9) 40 (5, 54) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.3, 6.0)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 13.3 (9.5, 18.2) 28 (6, 53) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.8)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 12.8 (12.0, 13.7) 32 (19, 41) 188 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.1, 9.7)
Houston County 6 Urban 15.7 (9.6, 24.8) 13 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Hubbard County 6 Rural 20.1 (13.6, 29.2) 4 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.0, 6.8)
Isanti County 6 Urban 18.5 (13.4, 25.0) 6 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.5, 10.7)
Itasca County 6 Rural 14.5 (10.5, 19.7) 17 (3, 52) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 5.5)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 22.7 (14.3, 34.7) 3 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 6.4 (3.7, 10.5) 54 (34, 54) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.3)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 16.9 (11.6, 23.9) 10 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.0, 10.2)
Lyon County 6 Rural 12.3 (7.1, 19.9) 36 (3, 54) 4
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural 14.5 (8.3, 23.7) 19 (1, 54) 4
*
*
McLeod County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.4, 19.3) 26 (3, 53) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 6.8)
Meeker County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.0, 15.2) 52 (11, 54) 3
*
*
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 17.0 (11.5, 24.4) 9 (1, 51) 6
*
*
Morrison County 6 Rural 12.6 (8.2, 18.6) 34 (4, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.0)
Mower County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.4, 19.3) 27 (4, 53) 7
*
*
Nicollet County 6 Urban 8.8 (5.1, 14.2) 53 (14, 54) 4
*
*
Olmsted County 6 Urban 14.1 (11.8, 16.7) 24 (7, 45) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 10.8 (7.8, 14.7) 49 (13, 54) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.3)
Pennington County 6 Rural 19.9 (11.4, 32.6) 5 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Pine County 6 Rural 14.4 (9.4, 21.4) 21 (2, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.6)
Polk County 6 Urban 15.9 (10.9, 22.7) 12 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.8, 8.4)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 11.1 (9.9, 12.4) 46 (27, 51) 68 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.4)
Rice County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.7, 16.0) 38 (9, 54) 10 falling falling trend -8.8 (-26.6, -0.3)
Scott County 6 Urban 11.4 (9.2, 14.1) 43 (15, 53) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.7)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 11.2 (8.4, 14.6) 45 (13, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 2.3)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 14.5 (12.5, 16.8) 18 (7, 40) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Stearns County 6 Urban 9.8 (7.9, 12.1) 50 (27, 54) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.1)
Steele County 6 Rural 11.0 (7.1, 16.3) 47 (9, 54) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 7.1)
Todd County 6 Rural 11.5 (6.8, 18.4) 42 (4, 54) 4
*
*
Wabasha County 6 Urban 17.2 (10.7, 26.5) 8 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend 15.2 (-22.1, 71.4)
Washington County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.8, 14.4) 35 (15, 49) 41 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.9)
Winona County 6 Rural 13.2 (9.5, 18.1) 29 (5, 53) 9 stable stable trend -4.2 (-27.3, 2.5)
Wright County 6 Urban 13.7 (11.1, 16.6) 25 (8, 48) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.2)
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/02/2024 1:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top