Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota 6 N/A 140.4 (138.6, 142.3) N/A 4,779 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 129.8 (129.5, 130.0) N/A 258,398 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Watonwan County 6 Rural 146.5 (108.1, 194.8) 25 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 10.2 (-2.1, 38.3)
Traverse County 6 Rural 220.5 (138.4, 338.5) 1 (1, 82) 5 rising rising trend 7.8 (0.7, 17.3)
Mahnomen County 6 Rural 137.8 (82.0, 217.4) 35 (1, 85) 4 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.9, 13.8)
Scott County 6 Urban 145.4 (133.5, 158.1) 27 (5, 58) 114 rising rising trend 6.5 (0.4, 10.7)
Clay County 6 Urban 155.0 (136.1, 175.8) 9 (2, 58) 51 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.5, 12.6)
Jackson County 6 Rural 148.5 (109.2, 198.8) 20 (1, 84) 11 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.9, 8.2)
Murray County 6 Rural 142.6 (98.2, 201.6) 29 (1, 85) 8 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 5.7)
Big Stone County 6 Rural 167.2 (110.7, 246.3) 4 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.6, 6.0)
Becker County 6 Rural 147.0 (124.0, 173.1) 21 (2, 74) 34 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.6)
Lake County 6 Rural 129.6 (95.6, 173.8) 54 (2, 85) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.6)
Pope County 6 Rural 133.5 (96.3, 181.5) 45 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.9)
Wadena County 6 Rural 119.3 (87.9, 159.0) 66 (3, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-12.9, 14.8)
Wright County 6 Urban 141.4 (129.4, 154.3) 30 (8, 62) 105 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.7, 6.1)
Brown County 6 Rural 149.6 (122.7, 180.8) 17 (1, 76) 26 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.0)
Dakota County 6 Urban 149.9 (143.1, 156.9) 14 (7, 39) 386 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 4.0)
Nobles County 6 Rural 133.4 (104.8, 167.4) 46 (2, 83) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 167.2 (109.6, 246.3) 5 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.7)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 162.9 (137.4, 191.8) 6 (1, 62) 32 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.8)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 135.9 (118.9, 154.8) 40 (7, 76) 59 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.8, 2.8)
Clearwater County 6 Rural 168.8 (120.3, 231.0) 3 (1, 82) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.0, 6.6)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 145.6 (124.6, 169.2) 26 (2, 71) 39 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 4.0)
Meeker County 6 Rural 133.7 (107.4, 164.7) 44 (3, 83) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.4)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 149.2 (123.9, 178.5) 19 (1, 74) 27 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.7)
Renville County 6 Rural 154.4 (117.3, 199.8) 10 (1, 82) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 4.4)
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural 152.4 (112.3, 203.6) 12 (1, 83) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.0)
Morrison County 6 Rural 150.2 (126.5, 177.3) 13 (2, 72) 33 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 149.4 (111.4, 196.8) 18 (1, 83) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.6)
Polk County 6 Urban 133.4 (110.0, 160.4) 47 (4, 82) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.7)
Carlton County 6 Urban 115.2 (94.8, 138.9) 74 (17, 85) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Douglas County 6 Rural 136.6 (116.6, 159.4) 39 (5, 77) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Sibley County 6 Rural 137.2 (102.8, 179.7) 37 (1, 84) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 157.4 (148.6, 166.6) 7 (3, 32) 254 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 2.0)
Isanti County 6 Urban 139.5 (118.9, 162.8) 31 (4, 76) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.3)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 117.6 (95.3, 143.9) 69 (15, 84) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.3)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 128.4 (113.2, 145.1) 57 (14, 79) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 146.8 (126.3, 169.8) 24 (2, 69) 42 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.1)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 155.1 (143.7, 167.3) 8 (3, 41) 146 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 146.9 (142.9, 151.1) 22 (12, 38) 1,067 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Houston County 6 Urban 153.7 (122.5, 190.9) 11 (1, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.3)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 138.6 (120.9, 158.2) 34 (5, 75) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Roseau County 6 Rural 122.6 (91.2, 161.9) 65 (3, 85) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.6)
Anoka County 6 Urban 134.5 (127.4, 142.0) 42 (22, 62) 283 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Cass County 6 Rural 109.7 (90.0, 132.9) 79 (25, 85) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Dodge County 6 Urban 135.6 (107.1, 169.6) 41 (3, 83) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 112.3 (92.3, 135.7) 76 (22, 85) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.9)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 125.1 (98.8, 156.8) 61 (5, 84) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Martin County 6 Rural 146.8 (116.9, 182.5) 23 (1, 80) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.3)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 136.9 (110.2, 168.7) 38 (3, 82) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.9)
Chisago County 6 Urban 149.7 (131.0, 170.5) 15 (2, 65) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.8)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 137.3 (131.4, 143.4) 36 (21, 56) 443 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Redwood County 6 Rural 172.6 (134.8, 217.9) 2 (1, 73) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 2.9)
Rice County 6 Rural 139.0 (121.9, 157.9) 33 (5, 72) 53 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 131.8 (117.5, 147.4) 50 (13, 75) 64 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Carver County 6 Urban 134.5 (121.3, 148.8) 43 (11, 72) 80 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.6)
McLeod County 6 Rural 116.8 (97.8, 138.6) 70 (16, 85) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Todd County 6 Rural 103.9 (81.6, 130.8) 80 (26, 85) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Lyon County 6 Rural 130.9 (105.5, 160.8) 51 (4, 83) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Waseca County 6 Rural 128.0 (100.9, 160.7) 58 (4, 84) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.1)
Itasca County 6 Rural 128.8 (110.6, 149.5) 55 (9, 80) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Marshall County 6 Rural 124.8 (83.6, 179.7) 62 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.7)
Faribault County 6 Rural 149.7 (115.0, 192.4) 16 (1, 82) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-17.5, 3.3)
Pine County 6 Rural 133.1 (109.4, 161.1) 48 (3, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.6)
Stearns County 6 Urban 139.3 (128.0, 151.4) 32 (10, 65) 121 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 113.7 (83.1, 153.5) 75 (5, 85) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 115.9 (96.4, 138.3) 73 (22, 85) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Grant County 6 Rural 130.8 (84.0, 196.8) 52 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 4.9)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 124.1 (115.0, 133.8) 63 (34, 76) 162 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Mower County 6 Rural 130.5 (109.8, 153.9) 53 (6, 81) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.5)
Rock County 6 Urban 110.5 (76.1, 156.2) 77 (4, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.1)
Koochiching County 6 Rural 102.4 (74.5, 139.3) 82 (14, 85) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.5)
Stevens County 6 Rural 103.3 (65.0, 155.7) 81 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.4, 5.6)
Winona County 6 Rural 128.6 (109.7, 150.0) 56 (8, 81) 38 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 117.7 (90.1, 153.0) 68 (5, 85) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.4)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 126.5 (100.4, 157.9) 60 (4, 84) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.6)
Pipestone County 6 Rural 127.4 (88.8, 178.2) 59 (1, 85) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.1)
Norman County 6 Rural 116.7 (77.5, 172.0) 71 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural 110.0 (68.2, 170.6) 78 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.2, 2.6)
Swift County 6 Rural 100.5 (68.6, 143.7) 83 (7, 85) 8 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -1.5)
Steele County 6 Rural 132.7 (112.3, 156.0) 49 (6, 81) 33 falling falling trend -6.4 (-16.7, -0.2)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 116.4 (99.2, 135.9) 72 (21, 83) 37 falling falling trend -9.0 (-13.7, -4.0)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 92.2 (67.3, 124.2) 85 (38, 85) 11 falling falling trend -13.9 (-42.7, -1.6)
Cook County 6 Rural 95.6 (59.2, 153.0) 84 (5, 85) 5
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural 143.8 (108.2, 187.6) 28 (1, 84) 12
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural 118.0 (65.1, 201.3) 67 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural 123.6 (78.6, 187.0) 64 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 4:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top