Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 114.4 (112.8, 116.0) N/A 3,861 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 105.2 (102.1, 108.5) 61 (46, 69) 849 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 104.7 (99.7, 109.8) 62 (45, 71) 346 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.9, 0.8)
Dakota County 6 Urban 124.6 (118.7, 130.7) 26 (13, 47) 337 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.1)
Anoka County 6 Urban 118.6 (112.3, 125.1) 40 (19, 56) 267 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 1.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 122.4 (114.8, 130.2) 32 (13, 52) 198 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.1)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 152.3 (141.4, 163.7) 3 (1, 16) 148 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 119.0 (109.8, 128.6) 41 (14, 62) 128 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Scott County 6 Urban 118.5 (109.1, 128.5) 42 (14, 62) 118 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.8)
Wright County 6 Urban 109.9 (100.4, 120.1) 57 (23, 70) 99 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.3)
Stearns County 6 Urban 111.1 (101.1, 121.8) 54 (21, 71) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 126.0 (113.9, 139.0) 22 (7, 58) 80 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4)
Carver County 6 Urban 115.8 (104.6, 127.9) 47 (14, 69) 79 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Clay County 6 Urban 134.4 (118.4, 152.0) 13 (2, 54) 52 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.3)
Chisago County 6 Urban 125.4 (109.1, 143.5) 25 (5, 68) 43 rising rising trend 10.6 (2.7, 22.6)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 122.9 (106.8, 140.8) 30 (4, 68) 42 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.2)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 112.6 (97.2, 129.6) 51 (12, 75) 40 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.0)
Rice County 6 Rural 106.3 (92.0, 122.2) 60 (19, 77) 40 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 125.1 (107.6, 144.7) 23 (4, 70) 36 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.2)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 124.7 (106.3, 145.3) 24 (3, 70) 33 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Itasca County 6 Rural 140.3 (119.5, 163.6) 7 (1, 57) 33 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 4.0)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 127.4 (107.7, 149.5) 19 (2, 70) 30 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.3)
Winona County 6 Rural 121.7 (102.9, 142.8) 35 (4, 73) 30 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.0)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 126.9 (107.1, 149.1) 20 (3, 69) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.2)
Isanti County 6 Urban 119.7 (100.8, 141.1) 38 (5, 74) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 3.9)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 136.0 (114.0, 161.0) 12 (1, 65) 27 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 5.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 104.4 (87.4, 123.7) 64 (18, 79) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1)
Douglas County 6 Rural 124.2 (103.4, 147.9) 29 (3, 72) 25 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.1, 4.8)
Steele County 6 Rural 112.0 (92.6, 134.1) 52 (7, 78) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.6, 1.9)
Mower County 6 Rural 103.2 (85.2, 123.8) 66 (16, 79) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Carlton County 6 Urban 104.4 (86.1, 125.5) 63 (16, 80) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.5)
Morrison County 6 Rural 123.3 (101.6, 148.2) 27 (2, 75) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Becker County 6 Rural 117.6 (96.2, 142.2) 39 (4, 76) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 3.7)
McLeod County 6 Rural 96.6 (78.7, 117.3) 71 (19, 81) 20 falling falling trend -14.6 (-31.4, -1.7)
Pine County 6 Rural 120.6 (97.8, 147.2) 34 (3, 76) 19 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 5.2)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 115.3 (93.3, 141.0) 48 (4, 78) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.8)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 116.0 (93.7, 142.0) 45 (4, 77) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.7)
Polk County 6 Urban 110.0 (88.7, 134.8) 53 (7, 79) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.1)
Brown County 6 Rural 129.9 (103.9, 160.3) 16 (1, 74) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.7)
Dodge County 6 Urban 117.7 (92.7, 147.3) 43 (2, 79) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-21.4, 0.4)
Lyon County 6 Rural 103.7 (81.5, 130.0) 65 (9, 80) 15 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.8, 0.9)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 129.8 (101.7, 163.2) 17 (1, 76) 15 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 4.8)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 97.5 (76.2, 122.7) 70 (16, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.4)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 135.9 (106.1, 171.5) 6 (1, 72) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 6.8)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 124.0 (96.4, 157.0) 31 (2, 79) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.8)
Todd County 6 Rural 107.1 (83.1, 135.8) 59 (7, 81) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.3, 5.3)
Martin County 6 Rural 130.3 (100.7, 165.8) 15 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.6)
Waseca County 6 Rural 114.7 (88.3, 146.4) 50 (3, 80) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 4.9)
Meeker County 6 Rural 99.3 (76.2, 127.1) 69 (10, 81) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 4.6)
Sibley County 6 Rural 153.2 (117.6, 195.9) 2 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.2)
Cass County 6 Rural 90.9 (69.6, 116.4) 75 (19, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.0)
Nobles County 6 Rural 95.4 (72.3, 123.3) 72 (10, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Houston County 6 Urban 111.3 (84.0, 144.5) 56 (3, 81) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-12.4, 2.0)
Renville County 6 Rural 135.8 (101.3, 177.9) 10 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -11.3 (-30.2, 0.2)
Pennington County 6 Rural 120.0 (88.6, 158.7) 37 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 6.7)
Redwood County 6 Rural 117.2 (85.7, 156.1) 46 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 4.6)
Faribault County 6 Rural 124.2 (90.3, 166.6) 28 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.1)
Pope County 6 Rural 134.1 (94.7, 184.1) 14 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.9, 5.2)
Watonwan County 6 Rural 128.7 (90.5, 176.9) 18 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.6)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 83.0 (58.0, 114.9) 79 (20, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.7)
Roseau County 6 Rural 88.8 (62.1, 122.8) 76 (14, 81) 7 stable stable trend -10.6 (-39.5, 2.7)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 111.5 (77.5, 154.8) 55 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.6, 4.9)
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 120.7 (83.5, 168.3) 36 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.5)
Lake County 6 Rural 122.7 (84.4, 172.4) 33 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural 86.8 (59.2, 122.3) 78 (12, 81) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 4.0)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 94.4 (63.9, 134.4) 73 (6, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.2)
Clearwater County 6 Rural 138.0 (93.7, 195.6) 11 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.2, 8.1)
Rock County 6 Urban 115.2 (78.2, 163.3) 49 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.1, 3.5)
Stevens County 6 Rural 127.3 (85.7, 181.0) 21 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.6)
Norman County 6 Rural 148.5 (96.8, 217.5) 4 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural 108.5 (70.7, 158.5) 58 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 101.9 (65.1, 151.5) 67 (2, 81) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 7.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 88.4 (56.0, 132.4) 77 (6, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-9.5, 4.4)
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural 92.8 (58.7, 138.9) 74 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.9, 6.6)
Koochiching County 6 Rural 73.1 (45.7, 110.9) 81 (27, 81) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-35.7, 8.8)
Grant County 6 Rural 132.2 (81.7, 202.0) 8 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.5)
Wilkin County 6 Rural 117.5 (72.7, 179.5) 44 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.3, 9.7)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 145.8 (89.0, 224.3) 5 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural 100.4 (61.3, 154.6) 68 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural 77.5 (47.3, 119.6) 80 (10, 81) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.9, 3.6)
Big Stone County 6 Rural 138.3 (80.0, 221.7) 9 (1, 81) 3
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural 150.7 (85.9, 244.8) 1 (1, 81) 3
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/11/2024 11:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top