Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 480.0 (477.6, 482.4) N/A 32,955 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Anoka County 6 Urban 494.4 (484.6, 504.4) 34 (20, 55) 2,047 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Benton County 6 Urban 444.3 (416.3, 473.7) 81 (38, 87) 197 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 457.4 (434.7, 481.1) 73 (33, 86) 324 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Carlton County 6 Urban 485.4 (457.1, 515.2) 46 (8, 80) 233 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Carver County 6 Urban 445.9 (428.1, 464.4) 78 (53, 86) 502 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Chisago County 6 Urban 502.0 (477.9, 527.1) 28 (6, 68) 347 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.2, 9.1)
Clay County 6 Urban 540.1 (514.8, 566.3) 7 (2, 33) 357 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Dakota County 6 Urban 489.5 (480.6, 498.4) 43 (23, 58) 2,449 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 2.9)
Dodge County 6 Urban 478.7 (439.5, 520.6) 55 (6, 86) 115 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 0.1)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 490.2 (453.5, 529.3) 40 (5, 82) 149 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 458.7 (453.6, 463.8) 71 (59, 79) 6,537 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Houston County 6 Urban 452.2 (415.5, 491.6) 76 (19, 87) 127 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.3, 0.4)
Isanti County 6 Urban 514.4 (486.0, 544.2) 16 (3, 64) 260 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.8)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 487.5 (455.4, 521.4) 44 (7, 81) 182 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 508.9 (475.3, 544.4) 20 (3, 73) 182 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.4)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 466.1 (436.0, 497.7) 68 (17, 86) 190 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 516.0 (501.1, 531.1) 14 (6, 40) 965 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 501.6 (470.1, 534.8) 30 (4, 74) 207 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 473.3 (465.4, 481.2) 61 (42, 71) 2,919 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Rock County 6 Urban 470.6 (417.5, 529.0) 63 (4, 87) 63 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Scott County 6 Urban 470.2 (454.2, 486.6) 65 (31, 79) 697 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 485.1 (464.9, 505.9) 47 (14, 76) 464 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 494.1 (481.8, 506.6) 35 (17, 59) 1,374 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Stearns County 6 Urban 470.2 (455.6, 485.1) 64 (34, 79) 835 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.5)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 484.6 (449.0, 522.6) 48 (6, 84) 155 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Washington County 6 Urban 504.0 (492.6, 515.5) 24 (13, 46) 1,584 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 2.2)
Wright County 6 Urban 477.3 (461.3, 493.7) 57 (25, 76) 702 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 489.5 (451.1, 531.3) 42 (5, 84) 162 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Becker County 6 Rural 523.4 (493.7, 554.5) 11 (2, 55) 262 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 512.8 (485.0, 541.9) 17 (4, 65) 274 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Big Stone County 6 Rural 511.6 (437.9, 595.4) 18 (1, 87) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Brown County 6 Rural 509.9 (475.7, 546.1) 19 (3, 76) 188 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Cass County 6 Rural 481.0 (452.1, 511.5) 52 (11, 83) 250 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 528.2 (479.4, 581.0) 10 (2, 76) 98 stable stable trend -3.4 (-11.2, 2.4)
Clearwater County 6 Rural 493.5 (435.4, 557.6) 36 (2, 86) 58 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Cook County 6 Rural 408.6 (349.5, 477.0) 87 (16, 87) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.0)
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 489.9 (440.6, 543.6) 41 (3, 86) 84 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 3.8)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 507.8 (487.0, 529.3) 22 (6, 58) 517 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Douglas County 6 Rural 487.4 (460.9, 515.2) 45 (11, 79) 291 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Faribault County 6 Rural 492.4 (448.0, 540.3) 38 (3, 85) 105 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 448.5 (419.8, 478.8) 77 (31, 87) 208 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 484.0 (459.5, 509.5) 49 (11, 78) 323 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Grant County 6 Rural 530.6 (462.3, 607.3) 9 (1, 84) 50 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 531.1 (493.8, 570.8) 8 (2, 57) 181 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Itasca County 6 Rural 493.1 (468.1, 519.3) 37 (8, 75) 343 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 445.7 (396.8, 499.7) 79 (12, 87) 69 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 1.9)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 469.6 (430.1, 512.3) 66 (6, 86) 115 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 483.1 (456.8, 510.5) 51 (11, 81) 280 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 2.9)
Kittson County 6 Rural 491.6 (413.3, 582.3) 39 (2, 87) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.2)
Koochiching County 6 Rural 429.5 (388.5, 474.5) 85 (32, 87) 94 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural 440.7 (384.2, 504.7) 82 (8, 87) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Lake County 6 Rural 505.1 (456.4, 558.4) 23 (2, 85) 96 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural 477.7 (398.2, 571.1) 56 (2, 87) 30 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 5.1)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 582.3 (505.8, 668.0) 2 (1, 73) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.4)
Lyon County 6 Rural 478.9 (443.8, 516.2) 54 (8, 85) 147 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Mahnomen County 6 Rural 568.0 (488.9, 657.0) 3 (1, 82) 40 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 5.7)
Marshall County 6 Rural 515.5 (459.7, 576.9) 15 (2, 84) 70 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Martin County 6 Rural 483.8 (446.8, 523.3) 50 (6, 85) 150 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
McLeod County 6 Rural 452.8 (426.2, 480.8) 75 (33, 86) 230 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Meeker County 6 Rural 468.1 (434.3, 504.1) 67 (13, 86) 156 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Morrison County 6 Rural 479.3 (450.3, 509.7) 53 (12, 84) 227 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Mower County 6 Rural 457.5 (430.7, 485.5) 72 (27, 86) 236 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Murray County 6 Rural 456.1 (402.7, 515.6) 74 (6, 87) 63 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Nobles County 6 Rural 473.8 (436.8, 513.3) 60 (9, 85) 129 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Norman County 6 Rural 546.5 (477.8, 623.2) 5 (1, 82) 51 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.8, 10.2)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 498.2 (476.6, 520.7) 33 (9, 67) 473 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Pennington County 6 Rural 503.9 (457.6, 553.9) 25 (2, 82) 94 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.3, 12.5)
Pine County 6 Rural 502.0 (470.8, 534.9) 29 (4, 76) 214 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.3, 7.4)
Pipestone County 6 Rural 517.1 (461.1, 578.6) 13 (2, 84) 69 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Pope County 6 Rural 470.7 (422.3, 523.6) 62 (6, 87) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Red Lake County 6 Rural 552.4 (464.0, 654.3) 4 (1, 86) 31 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.8, 4.8)
Redwood County 6 Rural 499.4 (456.0, 546.2) 32 (3, 83) 109 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Renville County 6 Rural 517.7 (472.2, 566.6) 12 (2, 77) 109 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Rice County 6 Rural 475.3 (453.5, 497.9) 58 (21, 82) 376 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Roseau County 6 Rural 444.4 (403.0, 489.1) 80 (17, 87) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Sibley County 6 Rural 508.0 (462.3, 557.1) 21 (3, 81) 100 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Steele County 6 Rural 459.9 (432.3, 488.8) 69 (21, 86) 223 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Stevens County 6 Rural 439.8 (383.3, 502.4) 83 (7, 87) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 1.9)
Swift County 6 Rural 421.1 (373.7, 473.6) 86 (26, 87) 65 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Todd County 6 Rural 435.8 (404.3, 469.2) 84 (40, 87) 163 stable stable trend 6.6 (-2.4, 12.8)
Traverse County 6 Rural 693.5 (588.2, 814.3) 1 (1, 15) 37 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.9, 5.5)
Wadena County 6 Rural 502.9 (458.4, 551.0) 26 (3, 82) 103 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Waseca County 6 Rural 459.5 (421.2, 500.6) 70 (12, 87) 114 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Watonwan County 6 Rural 501.5 (449.5, 558.1) 31 (2, 85) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Wilkin County 6 Rural 544.2 (475.7, 620.6) 6 (1, 81) 49 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Winona County 6 Rural 474.4 (449.1, 500.8) 59 (18, 82) 290 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural 502.1 (448.2, 561.3) 27 (2, 85) 70 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/07/2024 7:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top