Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota 6 | N/A | 516.6 (513.0, 520.2) | N/A | 16,983 | stable | -0.8 (-1.9, 0.6) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) | N/A | 888,315 | stable | -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Kanabec County 6 | Rural | 525.4 (467.3, 589.7) | 42 (5, 85) | 65 | stable | 8.8 (-2.0, 15.8) |
Pennington County 6 | Rural | 564.7 (495.3, 641.6) | 17 (1, 80) | 50 | stable | 8.3 (-0.8, 18.0) |
Chisago County 6 | Urban | 509.8 (475.6, 546.0) | 50 (15, 82) | 178 | rising | 5.6 (1.8, 12.0) |
Todd County 6 | Rural | 463.7 (419.9, 511.3) | 83 (30, 87) | 91 | stable | 5.6 (-5.9, 12.4) |
Hubbard County 6 | Rural | 585.0 (532.4, 642.2) | 9 (1, 58) | 104 | rising | 4.7 (1.9, 10.5) |
Mille Lacs County 6 | Urban | 592.6 (540.6, 648.5) | 7 (1, 50) | 102 | stable | 3.9 (-0.8, 13.2) |
Yellow Medicine County 6 | Rural | 608.3 (524.5, 702.8) | 4 (1, 76) | 41 | stable | 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1) |
Lake of the Woods County 6 | Rural | 525.7 (409.9, 669.2) | 41 (1, 87) | 17 | stable | 1.8 (-1.1, 8.3) |
Stearns County 6 | Urban | 497.5 (476.2, 519.5) | 59 (35, 79) | 433 | stable | 1.3 (-0.2, 4.1) |
Lake County 6 | Rural | 573.0 (501.6, 653.3) | 15 (1, 82) | 55 | stable | 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0) |
Marshall County 6 | Rural | 589.0 (507.2, 681.5) | 8 (1, 83) | 41 | stable | 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6) |
Traverse County 6 | Rural | 721.8 (584.8, 886.9) | 1 (1, 65) | 21 | stable | 0.7 (-3.0, 4.4) |
Wilkin County 6 | Rural | 536.7 (443.8, 644.9) | 32 (1, 87) | 25 | stable | 0.7 (-1.5, 3.2) |
Brown County 6 | Rural | 540.5 (491.6, 593.4) | 25 (4, 81) | 98 | stable | 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4) |
Grant County 6 | Rural | 582.6 (482.0, 700.0) | 11 (1, 86) | 27 | stable | 0.5 (-1.3, 2.2) |
Ramsey County 6 | Urban | 514.9 (502.7, 527.3) | 46 (31, 65) | 1,441 | stable | 0.4 (-0.3, 1.7) |
Red Lake County 6 | Rural | 605.7 (483.5, 753.4) | 5 (1, 87) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-2.7, 3.9) |
Sibley County 6 | Rural | 494.5 (432.0, 564.0) | 66 (7, 87) | 48 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
Clay County 6 | Urban | 583.9 (546.1, 623.6) | 10 (2, 41) | 184 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6) |
Isanti County 6 | Urban | 544.8 (502.8, 589.6) | 23 (5, 73) | 133 | stable | 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5) |
Kittson County 6 | Rural | 496.1 (394.6, 621.0) | 62 (2, 87) | 18 | stable | 0.2 (-2.8, 3.2) |
Norman County 6 | Rural | 594.8 (497.8, 707.2) | 6 (1, 84) | 28 | stable | 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4) |
Crow Wing County 6 | Rural | 582.4 (551.5, 614.9) | 12 (3, 36) | 294 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2) |
Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 626.6 (520.0, 750.9) | 3 (1, 82) | 27 | stable | 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2) |
Chippewa County 6 | Rural | 573.5 (503.2, 651.8) | 14 (1, 80) | 52 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4) |
Faribault County 6 | Rural | 520.0 (457.8, 589.2) | 43 (4, 86) | 56 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3) |
Polk County 6 | Urban | 554.6 (507.9, 604.7) | 18 (3, 72) | 111 | stable | 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3) |
Renville County 6 | Rural | 547.1 (483.1, 618.0) | 22 (2, 84) | 58 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4) |
Wabasha County 6 | Urban | 501.5 (451.6, 556.0) | 55 (9, 86) | 81 | stable | 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4) |
Watonwan County 6 | Rural | 506.7 (434.6, 588.0) | 52 (4, 87) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6) |
Pine County 6 | Rural | 528.1 (484.5, 575.1) | 38 (7, 81) | 117 | stable | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9) |
Aitkin County 6 | Rural | 536.8 (482.5, 597.4) | 31 (4, 83) | 93 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
Dakota County 6 | Urban | 537.4 (523.6, 551.4) | 29 (17, 50) | 1,249 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2) |
Meeker County 6 | Rural | 516.1 (467.2, 569.2) | 45 (7, 85) | 88 | stable | -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0) |
Sherburne County 6 | Urban | 539.8 (508.2, 572.8) | 26 (8, 67) | 247 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9) |
Carlton County 6 | Urban | 553.8 (510.8, 599.6) | 19 (4, 68) | 130 | stable | -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0) |
Winona County 6 | Rural | 527.4 (489.6, 567.4) | 39 (9, 79) | 157 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8) |
Big Stone County 6 | Rural | 498.2 (400.5, 615.7) | 58 (2, 87) | 21 | stable | -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1) |
Clearwater County 6 | Rural | 514.8 (433.7, 608.0) | 47 (2, 87) | 31 | stable | -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3) |
Goodhue County 6 | Rural | 509.8 (474.6, 547.3) | 49 (16, 83) | 167 | stable | -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1) |
Itasca County 6 | Rural | 509.4 (474.7, 546.2) | 51 (15, 82) | 182 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Nobles County 6 | Rural | 533.1 (478.9, 592.0) | 36 (5, 84) | 73 | stable | -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6) |
Redwood County 6 | Rural | 535.0 (473.6, 602.9) | 34 (3, 85) | 58 | stable | -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7) |
Rock County 6 | Urban | 526.5 (448.1, 615.8) | 40 (2, 87) | 34 | stable | -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3) |
St. Louis County 6 | Urban | 547.8 (529.5, 566.5) | 21 (11, 47) | 749 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Washington County 6 | Urban | 538.8 (521.7, 556.4) | 27 (15, 52) | 803 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
Becker County 6 | Rural | 566.5 (524.2, 611.7) | 16 (3, 61) | 146 | stable | -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
Blue Earth County 6 | Urban | 497.4 (463.2, 533.3) | 61 (21, 85) | 167 | stable | -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9) |
Kandiyohi County 6 | Rural | 480.8 (444.0, 519.9) | 75 (28, 87) | 136 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4) |
Otter Tail County 6 | Rural | 537.2 (506.8, 569.1) | 30 (10, 69) | 262 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
Beltrami County 6 | Rural | 541.8 (501.0, 585.1) | 24 (5, 75) | 140 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
Fillmore County 6 | Urban | 534.2 (481.5, 591.6) | 35 (4, 83) | 81 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
Cottonwood County 6 | Rural | 517.2 (447.1, 596.1) | 44 (3, 87) | 43 | stable | -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9) |
Lac qui Parle County 6 | Rural | 493.5 (413.9, 587.2) | 69 (4, 87) | 31 | stable | -0.7 (-3.8, 2.3) |
McLeod County 6 | Rural | 510.8 (470.9, 553.5) | 48 (13, 85) | 126 | stable | -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7) |
Roseau County 6 | Rural | 494.2 (432.5, 562.8) | 67 (9, 87) | 51 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5) |
Cass County 6 | Rural | 536.3 (494.7, 581.1) | 33 (6, 76) | 145 | stable | -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1) |
Cook County 6 | Rural | 448.4 (362.6, 553.2) | 86 (8, 87) | 24 | stable | -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3) |
Jackson County 6 | Rural | 480.9 (412.2, 559.1) | 74 (7, 87) | 38 | stable | -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8) |
Rice County 6 | Rural | 485.7 (454.5, 518.6) | 72 (31, 86) | 189 | stable | -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0) |
Wright County 6 | Urban | 495.7 (472.0, 520.4) | 64 (32, 83) | 352 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Hennepin County 6 | Urban | 492.3 (484.5, 500.2) | 71 (50, 76) | 3,257 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
Martin County 6 | Rural | 506.3 (454.4, 563.1) | 53 (7, 86) | 78 | stable | -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9) |
Morrison County 6 | Rural | 494.7 (453.7, 538.6) | 65 (16, 86) | 117 | stable | -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
Scott County 6 | Urban | 493.6 (469.4, 518.6) | 68 (33, 83) | 349 | falling | -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1) |
Anoka County 6 | Urban | 528.3 (513.4, 543.6) | 37 (20, 58) | 1,042 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2) |
Lyon County 6 | Rural | 479.5 (429.2, 534.1) | 77 (14, 87) | 69 | stable | -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3) |
Mahnomen County 6 | Rural | 653.7 (534.8, 792.8) | 2 (1, 78) | 23 | stable | -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3) |
Murray County 6 | Rural | 435.0 (365.0, 516.8) | 87 (22, 87) | 31 | stable | -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2) |
Olmsted County 6 | Urban | 553.6 (531.3, 576.6) | 20 (8, 46) | 485 | falling | -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2) |
Pipestone County 6 | Rural | 538.7 (459.0, 629.5) | 28 (2, 87) | 34 | stable | -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7) |
Freeborn County 6 | Rural | 472.2 (431.4, 516.1) | 80 (31, 87) | 107 | falling | -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3) |
Koochiching County 6 | Rural | 468.1 (409.7, 534.3) | 81 (15, 87) | 52 | stable | -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7) |
Nicollet County 6 | Urban | 492.9 (449.3, 539.8) | 70 (15, 87) | 99 | stable | -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2) |
Wadena County 6 | Rural | 582.4 (515.0, 656.9) | 13 (1, 73) | 57 | falling | -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2) |
Carver County 6 | Urban | 466.7 (439.8, 494.9) | 82 (46, 87) | 249 | stable | -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3) |
Swift County 6 | Rural | 478.7 (407.9, 559.6) | 78 (8, 87) | 35 | stable | -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3) |
Waseca County 6 | Rural | 457.4 (402.9, 517.6) | 85 (22, 87) | 55 | stable | -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8) |
Douglas County 6 | Rural | 501.1 (464.3, 540.5) | 56 (16, 85) | 149 | falling | -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5) |
Pope County 6 | Rural | 473.4 (407.8, 547.7) | 79 (10, 87) | 42 | stable | -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3) |
Benton County 6 | Urban | 498.5 (455.2, 544.7) | 57 (16, 86) | 104 | falling | -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7) |
Houston County 6 | Urban | 480.1 (427.5, 538.0) | 76 (14, 87) | 68 | stable | -1.5 (-13.7, 1.7) |
Dodge County 6 | Urban | 495.9 (439.5, 557.7) | 63 (10, 87) | 59 | stable | -1.8 (-16.8, 1.4) |
Steele County 6 | Rural | 460.5 (421.5, 502.4) | 84 (40, 87) | 109 | falling | -1.8 (-2.7, -0.7) |
Le Sueur County 6 | Urban | 506.0 (460.0, 555.7) | 54 (10, 86) | 95 | falling | -1.9 (-7.1, -0.8) |
Stevens County 6 | Rural | 497.4 (414.3, 592.5) | 60 (3, 87) | 27 | falling | -3.3 (-14.8, -0.9) |
Mower County 6 | Rural | 481.5 (442.8, 522.8) | 73 (24, 87) | 120 | falling | -6.3 (-9.6, -3.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 5:02 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 5:02 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.