Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota 6 N/A 516.6 (513.0, 520.2) N/A 16,983 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 525.4 (467.3, 589.7) 42 (5, 85) 65 stable stable trend 8.8 (-2.0, 15.8)
Pennington County 6 Rural 564.7 (495.3, 641.6) 17 (1, 80) 50 stable stable trend 8.3 (-0.8, 18.0)
Chisago County 6 Urban 509.8 (475.6, 546.0) 50 (15, 82) 178 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.8, 12.0)
Todd County 6 Rural 463.7 (419.9, 511.3) 83 (30, 87) 91 stable stable trend 5.6 (-5.9, 12.4)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 585.0 (532.4, 642.2) 9 (1, 58) 104 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.9, 10.5)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 592.6 (540.6, 648.5) 7 (1, 50) 102 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.8, 13.2)
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural 608.3 (524.5, 702.8) 4 (1, 76) 41 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural 525.7 (409.9, 669.2) 41 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 8.3)
Stearns County 6 Urban 497.5 (476.2, 519.5) 59 (35, 79) 433 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 4.1)
Lake County 6 Rural 573.0 (501.6, 653.3) 15 (1, 82) 55 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 589.0 (507.2, 681.5) 8 (1, 83) 41 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Traverse County 6 Rural 721.8 (584.8, 886.9) 1 (1, 65) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.4)
Wilkin County 6 Rural 536.7 (443.8, 644.9) 32 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.2)
Brown County 6 Rural 540.5 (491.6, 593.4) 25 (4, 81) 98 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Grant County 6 Rural 582.6 (482.0, 700.0) 11 (1, 86) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.2)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 514.9 (502.7, 527.3) 46 (31, 65) 1,441 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.7)
Red Lake County 6 Rural 605.7 (483.5, 753.4) 5 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.9)
Sibley County 6 Rural 494.5 (432.0, 564.0) 66 (7, 87) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Clay County 6 Urban 583.9 (546.1, 623.6) 10 (2, 41) 184 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Isanti County 6 Urban 544.8 (502.8, 589.6) 23 (5, 73) 133 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Kittson County 6 Rural 496.1 (394.6, 621.0) 62 (2, 87) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.2)
Norman County 6 Rural 594.8 (497.8, 707.2) 6 (1, 84) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 582.4 (551.5, 614.9) 12 (3, 36) 294 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 626.6 (520.0, 750.9) 3 (1, 82) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 573.5 (503.2, 651.8) 14 (1, 80) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Faribault County 6 Rural 520.0 (457.8, 589.2) 43 (4, 86) 56 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 554.6 (507.9, 604.7) 18 (3, 72) 111 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Renville County 6 Rural 547.1 (483.1, 618.0) 22 (2, 84) 58 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 501.5 (451.6, 556.0) 55 (9, 86) 81 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Watonwan County 6 Rural 506.7 (434.6, 588.0) 52 (4, 87) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Pine County 6 Rural 528.1 (484.5, 575.1) 38 (7, 81) 117 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 536.8 (482.5, 597.4) 31 (4, 83) 93 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Dakota County 6 Urban 537.4 (523.6, 551.4) 29 (17, 50) 1,249 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Meeker County 6 Rural 516.1 (467.2, 569.2) 45 (7, 85) 88 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 539.8 (508.2, 572.8) 26 (8, 67) 247 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Carlton County 6 Urban 553.8 (510.8, 599.6) 19 (4, 68) 130 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Winona County 6 Rural 527.4 (489.6, 567.4) 39 (9, 79) 157 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Big Stone County 6 Rural 498.2 (400.5, 615.7) 58 (2, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Clearwater County 6 Rural 514.8 (433.7, 608.0) 47 (2, 87) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 509.8 (474.6, 547.3) 49 (16, 83) 167 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Itasca County 6 Rural 509.4 (474.7, 546.2) 51 (15, 82) 182 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Nobles County 6 Rural 533.1 (478.9, 592.0) 36 (5, 84) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Redwood County 6 Rural 535.0 (473.6, 602.9) 34 (3, 85) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Rock County 6 Urban 526.5 (448.1, 615.8) 40 (2, 87) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 547.8 (529.5, 566.5) 21 (11, 47) 749 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Washington County 6 Urban 538.8 (521.7, 556.4) 27 (15, 52) 803 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Becker County 6 Rural 566.5 (524.2, 611.7) 16 (3, 61) 146 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 497.4 (463.2, 533.3) 61 (21, 85) 167 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 480.8 (444.0, 519.9) 75 (28, 87) 136 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 537.2 (506.8, 569.1) 30 (10, 69) 262 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 541.8 (501.0, 585.1) 24 (5, 75) 140 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 534.2 (481.5, 591.6) 35 (4, 83) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 517.2 (447.1, 596.1) 44 (3, 87) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural 493.5 (413.9, 587.2) 69 (4, 87) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.3)
McLeod County 6 Rural 510.8 (470.9, 553.5) 48 (13, 85) 126 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Roseau County 6 Rural 494.2 (432.5, 562.8) 67 (9, 87) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Cass County 6 Rural 536.3 (494.7, 581.1) 33 (6, 76) 145 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Cook County 6 Rural 448.4 (362.6, 553.2) 86 (8, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 Rural 480.9 (412.2, 559.1) 74 (7, 87) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Rice County 6 Rural 485.7 (454.5, 518.6) 72 (31, 86) 189 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Wright County 6 Urban 495.7 (472.0, 520.4) 64 (32, 83) 352 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 492.3 (484.5, 500.2) 71 (50, 76) 3,257 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Martin County 6 Rural 506.3 (454.4, 563.1) 53 (7, 86) 78 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
Morrison County 6 Rural 494.7 (453.7, 538.6) 65 (16, 86) 117 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Scott County 6 Urban 493.6 (469.4, 518.6) 68 (33, 83) 349 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Anoka County 6 Urban 528.3 (513.4, 543.6) 37 (20, 58) 1,042 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lyon County 6 Rural 479.5 (429.2, 534.1) 77 (14, 87) 69 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Mahnomen County 6 Rural 653.7 (534.8, 792.8) 2 (1, 78) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Murray County 6 Rural 435.0 (365.0, 516.8) 87 (22, 87) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 553.6 (531.3, 576.6) 20 (8, 46) 485 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Pipestone County 6 Rural 538.7 (459.0, 629.5) 28 (2, 87) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 472.2 (431.4, 516.1) 80 (31, 87) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Koochiching County 6 Rural 468.1 (409.7, 534.3) 81 (15, 87) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 492.9 (449.3, 539.8) 70 (15, 87) 99 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Wadena County 6 Rural 582.4 (515.0, 656.9) 13 (1, 73) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Carver County 6 Urban 466.7 (439.8, 494.9) 82 (46, 87) 249 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Swift County 6 Rural 478.7 (407.9, 559.6) 78 (8, 87) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Waseca County 6 Rural 457.4 (402.9, 517.6) 85 (22, 87) 55 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Douglas County 6 Rural 501.1 (464.3, 540.5) 56 (16, 85) 149 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Pope County 6 Rural 473.4 (407.8, 547.7) 79 (10, 87) 42 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3)
Benton County 6 Urban 498.5 (455.2, 544.7) 57 (16, 86) 104 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Houston County 6 Urban 480.1 (427.5, 538.0) 76 (14, 87) 68 stable stable trend -1.5 (-13.7, 1.7)
Dodge County 6 Urban 495.9 (439.5, 557.7) 63 (10, 87) 59 stable stable trend -1.8 (-16.8, 1.4)
Steele County 6 Rural 460.5 (421.5, 502.4) 84 (40, 87) 109 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.7)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 506.0 (460.0, 555.7) 54 (10, 86) 95 falling falling trend -1.9 (-7.1, -0.8)
Stevens County 6 Rural 497.4 (414.3, 592.5) 60 (3, 87) 27 falling falling trend -3.3 (-14.8, -0.9)
Mower County 6 Rural 481.5 (442.8, 522.8) 73 (24, 87) 120 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.6, -3.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 5:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top