Incidence Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota 6 | N/A | 235.4 (233.5, 237.2) | N/A | 13,671 |
stable 
|
0.2 (0.0, 0.4) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) | N/A | 734,330 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Aitkin County 6 | Rural | 238.7 (203.7, 279.0) | 47 (3, 86) | 47 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.4, 1.1) |
| Anoka County 6 | Urban | 241.3 (234.1, 248.6) | 41 (22, 59) | 937 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.1, 0.7) |
| Becker County 6 | Rural | 266.3 (241.4, 293.1) | 10 (2, 65) | 99 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.3, 2.8) |
| Beltrami County 6 | Rural | 248.0 (225.9, 271.7) | 29 (5, 76) | 104 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.3, 1.9) |
| Benton County 6 | Urban | 214.2 (193.9, 236.1) | 76 (27, 87) | 86 |
falling 
|
-1.8 (-2.7, -0.8) |
| Big Stone County 6 | Rural | 261.9 (197.2, 341.9) | 14 (1, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-4.8, 2.4) |
| Blue Earth County 6 | Urban | 228.4 (210.5, 247.5) | 64 (21, 83) | 131 |
rising 
|
0.8 (0.1, 1.4) |
| Brown County 6 | Rural | 259.3 (230.3, 291.2) | 17 (2, 78) | 68 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.1, 2.7) |
| Carlton County 6 | Urban | 228.5 (207.0, 251.6) | 63 (13, 85) | 93 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) |
| Carver County 6 | Urban | 220.4 (207.9, 233.5) | 71 (38, 83) | 246 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.4) |
| Cass County 6 | Rural | 210.1 (186.2, 236.4) | 80 (28, 87) | 73 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.7, 0.9) |
| Chippewa County 6 | Rural | 262.4 (221.5, 308.9) | 12 (1, 82) | 34 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.7, 2.6) |
| Chisago County 6 | Urban | 240.6 (222.8, 259.6) | 43 (10, 76) | 150 |
stable
|
4.9 (-0.3, 11.8) |
| Clay County 6 | Urban | 274.6 (255.2, 295.2) | 6 (2, 38) | 155 |
rising
|
1.5 (0.5, 2.6) |
| Clearwater County 6 | Rural | 241.2 (193.4, 297.7) | 42 (2, 87) | 20 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.8, 3.5) |
| Cook County 6 | Rural | 189.8 (140.3, 253.7) | 87 (6, 87) | 13 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.8, 2.8) |
| Cottonwood County 6 | Rural | 215.0 (174.6, 262.2) | 74 (5, 87) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.5, 1.3) |
| Crow Wing County 6 | Rural | 251.3 (233.6, 270.1) | 24 (6, 65) | 178 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.2, 1.5) |
| Dakota County 6 | Urban | 247.6 (241.0, 254.4) | 30 (17, 49) | 1,128 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
| Dodge County 6 | Urban | 246.3 (216.3, 279.4) | 35 (3, 83) | 52 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.2, 1.9) |
| Douglas County 6 | Rural | 240.1 (217.4, 264.6) | 44 (7, 81) | 97 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.1, 2.5) |
| Faribault County 6 | Rural | 252.3 (214.3, 295.4) | 22 (2, 85) | 38 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.5, 3.1) |
| Fillmore County 6 | Urban | 243.9 (213.3, 277.8) | 39 (4, 85) | 53 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
| Freeborn County 6 | Rural | 219.9 (195.6, 246.5) | 72 (19, 87) | 70 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-8.2, 0.1) |
| Goodhue County 6 | Rural | 237.6 (217.7, 258.8) | 50 (10, 80) | 123 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.7, 1.0) |
| Grant County 6 | Rural | 261.4 (203.7, 331.4) | 15 (1, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.0, 3.2) |
| Hennepin County 6 | Urban | 222.3 (218.6, 226.1) | 70 (53, 76) | 2,853 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.5, 2.6) |
| Houston County 6 | Urban | 228.6 (197.9, 263.0) | 62 (6, 86) | 48 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.2, 2.0) |
| Hubbard County 6 | Rural | 258.3 (226.0, 294.3) | 18 (2, 78) | 56 |
stable
|
1.5 (0.0, 3.0) |
| Isanti County 6 | Urban | 248.2 (226.8, 271.1) | 27 (5, 76) | 111 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.1, 1.6) |
| Itasca County 6 | Rural | 262.3 (240.3, 286.0) | 13 (3, 59) | 126 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.1, 2.0) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 232.8 (191.3, 281.2) | 56 (3, 87) | 26 |
stable
|
0.4 (-17.4, 4.0) |
| Kanabec County 6 | Rural | 212.4 (181.7, 247.3) | 79 (15, 87) | 41 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.6, 2.0) |
| Kandiyohi County 6 | Rural | 236.7 (215.3, 259.8) | 53 (11, 81) | 104 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.3, 1.0) |
| Kittson County 6 | Rural | 283.5 (213.4, 371.3) | 4 (1, 86) | 14 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.7, 3.3) |
| Koochiching County 6 | Rural | 208.9 (174.6, 249.0) | 81 (12, 87) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-3.0, 2.5) |
| Lac qui Parle County 6 | Rural | 207.0 (159.7, 265.6) | 83 (5, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.6, 2.4) |
| Lake County 6 | Rural | 237.2 (195.7, 285.7) | 52 (2, 87) | 30 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.0, 3.6) |
| Lake of the Woods County 6 | Rural | 200.4 (139.8, 281.4) | 84 (2, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-3.7, 3.2) |
| Le Sueur County 6 | Urban | 239.2 (214.1, 266.6) | 46 (7, 84) | 74 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.3, 8.4) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 314.3 (246.7, 395.5) | 2 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
1.4 (-2.3, 5.7) |
| Lyon County 6 | Rural | 224.6 (197.8, 254.2) | 66 (11, 87) | 56 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.1, 2.1) |
| Mahnomen County 6 | Rural | 245.5 (187.1, 317.1) | 36 (1, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.4, 2.5) |
| Marshall County 6 | Rural | 254.9 (208.7, 308.8) | 19 (1, 86) | 25 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.4, 4.7) |
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 244.8 (212.9, 280.3) | 37 (3, 84) | 52 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.6, 2.4) |
| McLeod County 6 | Rural | 207.1 (186.3, 229.7) | 82 (34, 87) | 80 |
falling
|
-7.1 (-16.7, -0.9) |
| Meeker County 6 | Rural | 212.8 (186.3, 242.1) | 78 (18, 87) | 54 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.6, 1.8) |
| Mille Lacs County 6 | Urban | 230.2 (204.9, 258.0) | 58 (10, 85) | 68 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.7, 1.7) |
| Morrison County 6 | Rural | 264.9 (240.2, 291.7) | 11 (2, 64) | 98 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.1, 2.2) |
| Mower County 6 | Rural | 223.4 (202.0, 246.4) | 68 (18, 85) | 88 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.7) |
| Murray County 6 | Rural | 197.2 (153.2, 250.7) | 86 (7, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.3, 3.5) |
| Nicollet County 6 | Urban | 249.1 (224.4, 275.9) | 25 (4, 78) | 80 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.0, 1.5) |
| Nobles County 6 | Rural | 214.8 (186.9, 245.9) | 75 (16, 87) | 47 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
| Norman County 6 | Rural | 296.1 (237.7, 365.3) | 3 (1, 81) | 21 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.9, 4.3) |
| Olmsted County 6 | Urban | 272.6 (260.7, 285.0) | 8 (3, 28) | 424 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.0, 1.3) |
| Otter Tail County 6 | Rural | 244.2 (225.5, 264.1) | 38 (8, 76) | 158 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.1, 2.6) |
| Pennington County 6 | Rural | 254.1 (216.6, 296.4) | 20 (2, 84) | 37 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.6, 2.9) |
| Pine County 6 | Rural | 248.7 (223.3, 276.5) | 26 (4, 78) | 83 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.4, 1.4) |
| Pipestone County 6 | Rural | 246.8 (201.8, 299.5) | 31 (2, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.0, 2.8) |
| Polk County 6 | Urban | 246.5 (221.2, 274.0) | 34 (5, 79) | 79 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.4, 2.2) |
| Pope County 6 | Rural | 239.9 (197.7, 288.8) | 45 (2, 87) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.3, 2.1) |
| Ramsey County 6 | Urban | 226.3 (220.4, 232.3) | 65 (44, 74) | 1,207 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.6, 0.1) |
| Red Lake County 6 | Rural | 275.0 (202.7, 366.2) | 5 (1, 87) | 11 |
stable
|
2.6 (-0.1, 5.5) |
| Redwood County 6 | Rural | 260.4 (223.4, 302.1) | 16 (1, 82) | 41 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.0, 2.4) |
| Renville County 6 | Rural | 273.5 (234.7, 317.2) | 7 (1, 77) | 42 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.5, 3.6) |
| Rice County 6 | Rural | 238.7 (221.6, 256.7) | 48 (12, 78) | 159 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.2, 1.1) |
| Rock County 6 | Urban | 238.5 (195.0, 289.3) | 49 (2, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
0.1 (-3.0, 3.3) |
| Roseau County 6 | Rural | 219.6 (187.5, 255.9) | 73 (8, 87) | 39 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.9, 2.0) |
| Scott County 6 | Urban | 228.9 (218.1, 240.1) | 61 (31, 78) | 351 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.4, 0.6) |
| Sherburne County 6 | Urban | 234.6 (220.9, 249.0) | 54 (20, 76) | 228 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.7, 1.2) |
| Sibley County 6 | Rural | 266.8 (228.8, 309.6) | 9 (1, 81) | 40 |
rising
|
2.0 (0.4, 3.8) |
| St. Louis County 6 | Urban | 246.6 (236.4, 257.1) | 33 (14, 56) | 521 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.1, 1.2) |
| Stearns County 6 | Urban | 233.0 (221.6, 245.0) | 55 (23, 76) | 340 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
| Steele County 6 | Rural | 229.8 (207.8, 253.6) | 59 (13, 85) | 88 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.1, 1.8) |
| Stevens County 6 | Rural | 237.3 (188.9, 294.1) | 51 (2, 87) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.5, 2.1) |
| Swift County 6 | Rural | 199.8 (161.1, 245.8) | 85 (11, 87) | 21 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-4.1, 1.1) |
| Todd County 6 | Rural | 223.7 (196.8, 253.5) | 67 (12, 87) | 60 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.2, 2.0) |
| Traverse County 6 | Rural | 359.1 (267.7, 473.3) | 1 (1, 73) | 13 |
stable
|
2.6 (-1.0, 6.5) |
| Wabasha County 6 | Urban | 248.1 (217.9, 281.7) | 28 (3, 82) | 57 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.3, 2.5) |
| Wadena County 6 | Rural | 214.1 (179.8, 253.4) | 77 (11, 87) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.8, 1.1) |
| Waseca County 6 | Rural | 230.6 (200.3, 264.4) | 57 (6, 86) | 46 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.4, 2.2) |
| Washington County 6 | Urban | 246.8 (238.3, 255.5) | 32 (15, 55) | 694 |
stable
|
0.5 (0.0, 0.9) |
| Watonwan County 6 | Rural | 252.6 (209.5, 302.3) | 21 (1, 85) | 28 |
stable
|
1.8 (-4.6, 8.5) |
| Wilkin County 6 | Rural | 241.5 (190.0, 303.5) | 40 (1, 87) | 18 |
stable
|
2.6 (-0.1, 5.7) |
| Winona County 6 | Rural | 223.3 (203.1, 245.1) | 69 (18, 85) | 103 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.4, 1.2) |
| Wright County 6 | Urban | 229.2 (217.9, 240.9) | 60 (30, 78) | 324 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.2, 0.9) |
| Yellow Medicine County 6 | Rural | 251.6 (208.1, 302.3) | 23 (2, 86) | 28 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.9, 3.7) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:14 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:14 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.