Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 12.8 (12.4, 13.2) N/A 899 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.7, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 12.8 (12.0, 13.7) 32 (19, 41) 188 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.1, 9.7)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 11.1 (9.9, 12.4) 46 (27, 51) 68 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.4)
Dakota County 6 Urban 11.8 (10.5, 13.3) 39 (22, 49) 63 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.6)
Anoka County 6 Urban 13.1 (11.5, 14.7) 31 (14, 44) 56 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.5)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 14.5 (12.5, 16.8) 18 (7, 40) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.8, 14.4) 35 (15, 49) 41 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.9)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 14.1 (11.8, 16.7) 24 (7, 45) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)
Wright County 6 Urban 13.7 (11.1, 16.6) 25 (8, 48) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.2)
Stearns County 6 Urban 9.8 (7.9, 12.1) 50 (27, 54) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.1)
Scott County 6 Urban 11.4 (9.2, 14.1) 43 (15, 53) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.7)
Carver County 6 Urban 10.9 (8.3, 14.1) 48 (15, 54) 13 falling falling trend -12.6 (-21.8, -0.2)
Clay County 6 Urban 17.6 (13.3, 22.8) 7 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.9)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 11.3 (8.4, 14.9) 44 (12, 54) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.5)
Chisago County 6 Urban 15.6 (11.6, 20.5) 15 (2, 50) 11 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 8.3)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 11.2 (8.4, 14.6) 45 (13, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 2.3)
Itasca County 6 Rural 14.5 (10.5, 19.7) 17 (3, 52) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 5.5)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 10.8 (7.8, 14.7) 49 (13, 54) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.3)
Rice County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.7, 16.0) 38 (9, 54) 10 falling falling trend -8.8 (-26.6, -0.3)
Isanti County 6 Urban 18.5 (13.4, 25.0) 6 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.5, 10.7)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 13.3 (9.5, 18.2) 28 (6, 53) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.8)
Winona County 6 Rural 13.2 (9.5, 18.1) 29 (5, 53) 9 stable stable trend -4.2 (-27.3, 2.5)
Carlton County 6 Urban 16.7 (11.9, 22.9) 11 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.4, 9.5)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 14.4 (10.2, 19.9) 20 (2, 52) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.1)
Becker County 6 Rural 14.2 (9.9, 19.9) 23 (3, 53) 8
*
*
Cass County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.5, 22.6) 14 (2, 52) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 15.2)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 20.1 (13.6, 29.2) 4 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.0, 6.8)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 23.6 (15.1, 36.1) 2 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.6, 9.3)
Douglas County 6 Rural 12.2 (8.2, 17.6) 37 (5, 54) 7 stable stable trend 28.7 (-9.1, 60.3)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 16.9 (11.6, 23.9) 10 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.0, 10.2)
McLeod County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.4, 19.3) 26 (3, 53) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 6.8)
Mower County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.4, 19.3) 27 (4, 53) 7
*
*
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 9.6 (6.5, 13.5) 51 (17, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 15.9 (10.9, 22.7) 12 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.8, 8.4)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 17.0 (11.5, 24.4) 9 (1, 51) 6
*
*
Morrison County 6 Rural 12.6 (8.2, 18.6) 34 (4, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.0)
Pine County 6 Rural 14.4 (9.4, 21.4) 21 (2, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.6)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.4, 17.9) 40 (5, 54) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.3, 6.0)
Steele County 6 Rural 11.0 (7.1, 16.3) 47 (9, 54) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 7.1)
Brown County 6 Rural 13.1 (8.3, 19.9) 30 (3, 54) 5 falling falling trend -35.7 (-57.6, -6.0)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 22.7 (14.3, 34.7) 3 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban 11.6 (7.4, 17.3) 41 (6, 54) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.1)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 17.2 (10.7, 26.5) 8 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend 15.2 (-22.1, 71.4)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 14.4 (8.9, 22.3) 22 (2, 54) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.2, 9.3)
Houston County 6 Urban 15.7 (9.6, 24.8) 13 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Todd County 6 Rural 11.5 (6.8, 18.4) 42 (4, 54) 4
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural 14.5 (8.3, 23.7) 19 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 6.4 (3.7, 10.5) 54 (34, 54) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.3)
Lyon County 6 Rural 12.3 (7.1, 19.9) 36 (3, 54) 4
*
*
Nicollet County 6 Urban 8.8 (5.1, 14.2) 53 (14, 54) 4
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural 19.9 (11.4, 32.6) 5 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 25.3 (13.4, 43.2) 1 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Dodge County 6 Urban 12.6 (7.1, 20.9) 33 (2, 54) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.7, 5.0)
Faribault County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.2, 26.1) 16 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Meeker County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.0, 15.2) 52 (11, 54) 3
*
*
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 12:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Big Stone, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Grant, Jackson, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Lincoln, Mahnomen, Marshall, Murray, Nobles, Norman, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Wadena, Waseca, Watonwan, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top