Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County
Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota 6 | N/A | 117.0 (115.4, 118.6) | N/A | 4,204 |
stable 
|
1.7 (-0.3, 4.2) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) | N/A | 224,883 |
rising 
|
1.9 (0.4, 3.7) |
| Stevens County 6 | Rural | 93.6 (62.2, 136.5) | 72 (3, 86) | 6 |
falling 
|
-9.2 (-34.3, -4.9) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 95.7 (59.9, 149.5) | 67 (2, 86) | 5 |
falling
|
-6.2 (-11.1, -2.5) |
| Mower County 6 | Rural | 89.7 (74.1, 107.8) | 74 (35, 86) | 24 |
falling
|
-6.2 (-9.0, -4.0) |
| Steele County 6 | Rural | 104.5 (87.0, 124.7) | 58 (11, 84) | 26 |
falling
|
-6.1 (-8.9, -3.7) |
| Nobles County 6 | Rural | 84.2 (64.4, 108.6) | 82 (29, 86) | 13 |
falling
|
-6.0 (-9.0, -3.6) |
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 106.0 (84.7, 132.2) | 56 (7, 85) | 18 |
falling
|
-5.7 (-7.8, -4.0) |
| Nicollet County 6 | Urban | 85.7 (69.0, 105.6) | 80 (38, 86) | 19 |
falling
|
-5.7 (-8.4, -3.2) |
| Beltrami County 6 | Rural | 104.6 (87.7, 124.0) | 57 (13, 83) | 28 |
falling
|
-5.5 (-9.0, -2.6) |
| Benton County 6 | Urban | 113.2 (93.4, 135.9) | 45 (6, 80) | 25 |
falling
|
-5.5 (-7.4, -3.8) |
| Kanabec County 6 | Rural | 101.6 (77.8, 131.6) | 62 (6, 86) | 13 |
falling
|
-5.5 (-8.9, -2.6) |
| Norman County 6 | Rural | 86.3 (53.3, 135.3) | 78 (5, 86) | 4 |
falling
|
-5.5 (-9.9, -2.0) |
| Blue Earth County 6 | Urban | 89.1 (75.4, 104.8) | 75 (40, 86) | 31 |
falling
|
-5.1 (-7.1, -3.2) |
| Cottonwood County 6 | Rural | 93.9 (67.9, 128.4) | 71 (8, 86) | 9 |
falling
|
-5.0 (-8.3, -2.1) |
| Stearns County 6 | Urban | 112.8 (103.2, 123.0) | 49 (17, 68) | 106 |
falling
|
-5.0 (-6.4, -3.7) |
| Brown County 6 | Rural | 83.6 (66.1, 105.0) | 83 (35, 86) | 16 |
falling
|
-4.9 (-6.6, -3.3) |
| Freeborn County 6 | Rural | 88.7 (72.8, 107.7) | 76 (33, 86) | 22 |
falling
|
-4.7 (-6.5, -3.3) |
| Lake County 6 | Rural | 121.8 (93.2, 159.1) | 28 (2, 83) | 13 |
falling
|
-4.7 (-24.2, -0.6) |
| Todd County 6 | Rural | 113.2 (93.5, 136.5) | 46 (6, 81) | 25 |
falling
|
-4.7 (-7.4, -2.3) |
| McLeod County 6 | Rural | 113.0 (95.4, 133.2) | 48 (7, 78) | 30 |
falling
|
-4.4 (-6.7, -2.2) |
| Wright County 6 | Urban | 101.7 (91.5, 112.6) | 61 (31, 78) | 79 |
falling
|
-4.3 (-5.9, -2.6) |
| Redwood County 6 | Rural | 111.4 (85.6, 143.6) | 51 (3, 85) | 13 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-6.6, -2.0) |
| Swift County 6 | Rural | 94.2 (66.0, 132.6) | 70 (5, 86) | 8 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-7.6, -1.1) |
| Winona County 6 | Rural | 94.5 (80.1, 111.1) | 69 (33, 85) | 32 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-5.9, -2.6) |
| Waseca County 6 | Rural | 86.1 (65.4, 112.2) | 79 (22, 86) | 12 |
stable
|
-4.1 (-9.2, 0.6) |
| Fillmore County 6 | Urban | 113.5 (91.0, 140.5) | 44 (4, 84) | 19 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-6.3, -1.9) |
| Kandiyohi County 6 | Rural | 109.9 (93.7, 128.5) | 53 (10, 80) | 34 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-5.7, -2.1) |
| Sibley County 6 | Rural | 94.8 (70.3, 126.2) | 68 (9, 86) | 11 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-6.8, -1.2) |
| Wadena County 6 | Rural | 137.3 (107.3, 174.2) | 11 (1, 73) | 15 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-7.4, -0.8) |
| Watonwan County 6 | Rural | 102.7 (74.1, 140.2) | 60 (4, 86) | 9 |
stable
|
-3.9 (-8.9, 0.1) |
| Polk County 6 | Urban | 102.8 (83.9, 125.1) | 59 (12, 85) | 22 |
falling
|
-3.8 (-6.1, -1.8) |
| Itasca County 6 | Rural | 90.3 (77.1, 105.7) | 73 (39, 86) | 36 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-5.8, -1.8) |
| Morrison County 6 | Rural | 111.3 (93.4, 132.1) | 52 (8, 80) | 29 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-5.0, -2.5) |
| Dodge County 6 | Urban | 81.9 (60.8, 108.3) | 85 (29, 86) | 11 |
stable
|
-3.6 (-7.8, 0.4) |
| Renville County 6 | Rural | 115.4 (88.7, 148.7) | 40 (2, 84) | 13 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-7.3, -0.3) |
| Carlton County 6 | Urban | 119.2 (100.3, 140.8) | 32 (4, 76) | 30 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-5.4, -1.5) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 123.4 (91.7, 164.5) | 26 (1, 84) | 11 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-6.3, -0.7) |
| Otter Tail County 6 | Rural | 133.8 (120.0, 149.1) | 13 (2, 48) | 72 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-5.4, -1.5) |
| Rock County 6 | Urban | 120.0 (85.9, 165.0) | 31 (1, 86) | 8 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-6.5, -0.6) |
| Roseau County 6 | Rural | 124.6 (95.9, 160.1) | 23 (1, 81) | 14 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-6.2, -0.5) |
| Pipestone County 6 | Rural | 101.4 (70.0, 143.9) | 63 (2, 86) | 7 |
stable
|
-3.1 (-6.7, 0.2) |
| Yellow Medicine County 6 | Rural | 146.0 (107.3, 195.6) | 5 (1, 76) | 10 |
stable
|
-3.0 (-6.7, 0.2) |
| Cook County 6 | Rural | 137.6 (96.3, 197.9) | 9 (1, 85) | 8 |
stable
|
-2.9 (-6.6, 0.8) |
| Chippewa County 6 | Rural | 135.8 (104.4, 175.1) | 12 (1, 77) | 13 |
stable
|
-2.8 (-5.7, 0.0) |
| Clearwater County 6 | Rural | 77.7 (51.0, 116.2) | 86 (14, 86) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.8 (-7.1, 1.0) |
| Pope County 6 | Rural | 130.0 (99.3, 169.1) | 17 (1, 80) | 13 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-5.6, 0.0) |
| Aitkin County 6 | Rural | 120.7 (99.7, 147.9) | 29 (3, 76) | 24 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.8, -0.6) |
| Mahnomen County 6 | Rural | 160.9 (108.1, 233.6) | 2 (1, 82) | 6 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-7.4, 2.0) |
| Meeker County 6 | Rural | 126.6 (104.5, 152.8) | 18 (2, 71) | 24 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.5, -0.4) |
| Scott County 6 | Urban | 111.6 (100.7, 123.4) | 50 (16, 69) | 85 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.4, -0.4) |
| St. Louis County 6 | Urban | 126.6 (118.4, 135.2) | 19 (8, 43) | 194 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.6, -1.4) |
| Rice County 6 | Rural | 99.9 (86.8, 114.7) | 65 (26, 82) | 43 |
stable
|
-2.3 (-4.5, 0.0) |
| Koochiching County 6 | Rural | 131.7 (103.7, 167.7) | 15 (1, 77) | 17 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-4.9, 0.7) |
| Murray County 6 | Rural | 114.6 (81.8, 159.4) | 43 (1, 86) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-4.9, 1.6) |
| Marshall County 6 | Rural | 138.3 (102.9, 184.2) | 8 (1, 80) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.6, 0.6) |
| Wilkin County 6 | Rural | 115.6 (75.8, 171.4) | 38 (1, 86) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.7, 2.1) |
| Big Stone County 6 | Rural | 142.9 (95.8, 210.3) | 6 (1, 86) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-4.1, 3.5) |
| Lyon County 6 | Rural | 108.5 (85.9, 135.4) | 55 (5, 85) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-6.8, 16.3) |
| Carver County 6 | Urban | 101.0 (89.4, 113.7) | 64 (28, 81) | 62 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-3.9, 8.1) |
| Grant County 6 | Rural | 148.8 (104.7, 209.0) | 4 (1, 82) | 8 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.6, 2.7) |
| Anoka County 6 | Urban | 113.0 (106.6, 119.7) | 47 (25, 61) | 250 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.0, 6.1) |
| Wabasha County 6 | Urban | 88.0 (69.4, 111.1) | 77 (29, 86) | 16 |
stable
|
0.9 (-5.5, 12.4) |
| Pine County 6 | Rural | 108.9 (90.6, 130.6) | 54 (8, 82) | 26 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.0, 8.6) |
| Sherburne County 6 | Urban | 118.5 (104.7, 133.6) | 33 (7, 67) | 59 |
stable
|
1.4 (-14.3, 17.7) |
| Crow Wing County 6 | Rural | 126.3 (113.3, 140.7) | 20 (4, 59) | 72 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.7, 8.9) |
| Hennepin County 6 | Urban | 115.2 (111.6, 118.8) | 41 (25, 54) | 835 |
rising
|
2.4 (0.6, 5.1) |
| Ramsey County 6 | Urban | 124.6 (118.9, 130.6) | 24 (11, 42) | 377 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.1, 7.0) |
| Washington County 6 | Urban | 131.0 (123.1, 139.4) | 16 (5, 38) | 214 |
rising
|
3.0 (0.5, 7.7) |
| Mille Lacs County 6 | Urban | 122.1 (100.5, 147.6) | 27 (2, 77) | 23 |
stable
|
3.5 (-6.5, 26.4) |
| Becker County 6 | Rural | 133.0 (113.8, 154.9) | 14 (2, 61) | 37 |
rising
|
4.2 (0.1, 12.4) |
| Olmsted County 6 | Urban | 120.2 (110.3, 130.9) | 30 (10, 58) | 112 |
stable
|
4.3 (-2.8, 18.7) |
| Faribault County 6 | Rural | 84.4 (62.0, 113.7) | 81 (21, 86) | 10 |
stable
|
4.7 (-2.3, 17.0) |
| Le Sueur County 6 | Urban | 96.5 (78.0, 118.5) | 66 (19, 86) | 20 |
stable
|
5.6 (-2.8, 17.8) |
| Dakota County 6 | Urban | 138.4 (131.8, 145.3) | 7 (3, 23) | 356 |
rising
|
5.8 (2.9, 10.0) |
| Goodhue County 6 | Rural | 117.6 (101.6, 135.6) | 36 (6, 72) | 41 |
stable
|
6.0 (-4.4, 21.8) |
| Hubbard County 6 | Rural | 124.6 (102.6, 151.0) | 25 (2, 74) | 25 |
rising
|
7.6 (2.0, 19.4) |
| Clay County 6 | Urban | 125.4 (108.7, 144.0) | 22 (4, 65) | 42 |
stable
|
7.9 (-2.6, 19.8) |
| Lac qui Parle County 6 | Rural | 137.3 (98.0, 191.3) | 10 (1, 83) | 9 |
stable
|
9.5 (-6.0, 45.1) |
| Cass County 6 | Rural | 116.8 (99.9, 136.7) | 37 (5, 73) | 36 |
stable
|
9.8 (-7.3, 22.0) |
| Douglas County 6 | Rural | 125.7 (108.8, 145.0) | 21 (3, 65) | 42 |
stable
|
10.0 (-1.3, 25.6) |
| Houston County 6 | Urban | 118.4 (94.6, 147.3) | 34 (3, 81) | 19 |
stable
|
10.2 (-1.6, 34.4) |
| Chisago County 6 | Urban | 118.3 (102.9, 135.6) | 35 (6, 71) | 45 |
rising
|
10.9 (4.0, 21.3) |
| Isanti County 6 | Urban | 115.5 (97.5, 136.3) | 39 (6, 77) | 31 |
rising
|
12.4 (2.8, 19.1) |
| Pennington County 6 | Rural | 115.0 (86.7, 150.7) | 42 (2, 85) | 11 |
stable
|
19.9 (-1.8, 40.3) |
| Kittson County 6 | Rural | 168.9 (111.2, 251.7) | 1 (1, 84) | 6 |
|
|
| Lake of the Woods County 6 | Rural | 81.9 (47.8, 144.0) | 84 (5, 86) | 4 |
|
|
| Red Lake County 6 | Rural | 152.3 (96.6, 234.4) | 3 (1, 86) | 5 |
|
|
| Traverse County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/15/2025 8:02 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Traverse
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/15/2025 8:02 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Traverse
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.