Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 18.1 (17.6, 18.6) N/A 1,239 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.0, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Winona County 6 Rural 14.9 (10.7, 20.3) 65 (20, 68) 9 stable stable trend -9.1 (-37.8, 1.5)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 11.9 (6.3, 21.9) 68 (14, 68) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.7, 4.3)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 17.5 (14.8, 20.5) 52 (20, 66) 32 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.1)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.2, 26.4) 60 (4, 68) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 4.1)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 18.3 (12.3, 26.3) 50 (4, 68) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.6)
Benton County 6 Urban 17.3 (12.3, 23.7) 54 (8, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Carver County 6 Urban 13.4 (10.5, 16.8) 67 (43, 68) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 3.2)
Koochiching County 6 Rural 21.1 (12.3, 34.8) 28 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.5, 5.9)
Meeker County 6 Rural 17.2 (11.5, 25.2) 56 (6, 68) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.5)
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 24.8 (17.5, 34.4) 8 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 4.9)
Steele County 6 Rural 20.4 (14.9, 27.3) 34 (4, 67) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.6)
Morrison County 6 Rural 20.1 (14.7, 27.1) 38 (4, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-10.2, 6.2)
Cass County 6 Rural 18.3 (12.8, 25.8) 49 (6, 68) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.9)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 15.2 (14.3, 16.2) 63 (49, 67) 216 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Stearns County 6 Urban 19.2 (16.3, 22.5) 43 (13, 62) 33 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Waseca County 6 Rural 19.8 (12.5, 30.2) 40 (2, 68) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.7)
Dakota County 6 Urban 16.9 (15.3, 18.7) 57 (34, 64) 86 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.7)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 16.8 (15.3, 18.3) 59 (36, 64) 105 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Nobles County 6 Rural 19.1 (12.1, 28.6) 45 (3, 68) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.5, 8.0)
Scott County 6 Urban 15.5 (12.8, 18.7) 62 (30, 68) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 4.1)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 16.9 (13.4, 21.1) 58 (18, 68) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 5.0)
Anoka County 6 Urban 19.0 (17.2, 21.0) 46 (21, 57) 81 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.8)
Brown County 6 Rural 17.7 (11.6, 26.0) 51 (5, 68) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.6)
McLeod County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.8, 22.0) 61 (14, 68) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 5.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 18.5 (16.4, 20.8) 48 (21, 60) 59 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.5)
Polk County 6 Urban 22.4 (16.0, 30.6) 20 (2, 66) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.3)
Sibley County 6 Rural 21.7 (13.2, 33.9) 23 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 6.3)
Douglas County 6 Rural 14.6 (10.2, 20.5) 66 (20, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 6.8)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 20.3 (15.2, 26.6) 37 (4, 66) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.7)
Pine County 6 Rural 23.2 (16.7, 31.6) 15 (2, 65) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.2, 6.7)
Clay County 6 Urban 21.3 (16.5, 27.0) 27 (4, 65) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.6)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 22.8 (18.3, 28.2) 16 (3, 56) 21 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.0)
Mower County 6 Rural 19.1 (13.9, 25.7) 44 (5, 68) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 6.9)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 20.3 (17.8, 23.1) 36 (11, 55) 56 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 3.9)
Carlton County 6 Urban 21.6 (16.1, 28.7) 24 (3, 65) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 7.4)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 15.1 (9.5, 23.3) 64 (9, 68) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.1, 8.0)
Faribault County 6 Rural 20.7 (11.9, 33.8) 31 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.7, 8.4)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 26.2 (20.0, 33.6) 4 (1, 54) 13 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 6.2)
Fillmore County 6 Urban 21.4 (14.1, 31.4) 26 (2, 68) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 6.5)
Rice County 6 Rural 22.4 (17.8, 27.8) 21 (3, 61) 17 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.3, 8.8)
Martin County 6 Rural 22.7 (15.3, 32.8) 17 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.3)
Redwood County 6 Rural 20.3 (12.4, 31.9) 35 (2, 68) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.4, 8.8)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 20.7 (16.5, 25.8) 32 (6, 63) 20 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.2, 5.9)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 23.3 (18.3, 29.2) 14 (2, 60) 16 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 6.9)
Houston County 6 Urban 19.6 (12.7, 29.4) 41 (3, 68) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.7, 9.8)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 20.4 (14.3, 28.4) 33 (3, 67) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 7.8)
Lyon County 6 Rural 17.2 (11.0, 25.8) 55 (5, 68) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.4, 10.2)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 20.8 (16.0, 26.8) 30 (4, 65) 14 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 8.2)
Todd County 6 Rural 21.1 (14.6, 29.7) 29 (2, 68) 8 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.9, 11.8)
Isanti County 6 Urban 23.9 (18.1, 31.1) 11 (2, 60) 12 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.6, 7.3)
Itasca County 6 Rural 25.9 (20.5, 32.4) 5 (1, 48) 18 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.8, 6.9)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 22.4 (16.2, 30.3) 19 (2, 65) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.2, 9.4)
Wright County 6 Urban 18.9 (15.8, 22.3) 47 (14, 63) 28 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.9, 14.5)
Chisago County 6 Urban 20.0 (15.4, 25.6) 39 (6, 66) 14 rising rising trend 11.8 (5.2, 24.1)
Becker County 6 Rural 19.3 (13.8, 26.3) 42 (5, 68) 9
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural 22.6 (13.3, 36.3) 18 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Cottonwood County 6 Rural 23.3 (13.5, 38.1) 12 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Dodge County 6 Urban 21.9 (14.4, 32.1) 22 (2, 68) 6
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural 21.4 (11.8, 36.6) 25 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 25.5 (14.9, 42.1) 7 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural 37.5 (20.9, 62.9) 2 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural 24.0 (14.6, 37.6) 10 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Renville County 6 Rural 31.3 (20.6, 45.9) 3 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban 24.2 (13.4, 41.0) 9 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural 23.3 (14.3, 36.1) 13 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Wabasha County 6 Urban 17.4 (11.2, 26.1) 53 (5, 68) 6
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural 25.6 (15.7, 39.7) 6 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural 40.7 (22.2, 68.9) 1 (1, 65) 3
*
*
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 3:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Big Stone, Clearwater, Cook, Grant, Jackson, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lake of the Woods, Lincoln, Mahnomen, Murray, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Watonwan, Yellow Medicine

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top