Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) N/A 441 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.3 (6.3, 6.3) N/A 22,899 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.3)
Chisago County 6 Urban 4.8 (2.6, 8.0) 29 (7, 29) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.7, 4.1)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) 28 (11, 29) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Stearns County 6 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 27 (8, 29) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.7)
Itasca County 6 Rural 6.1 (3.3, 10.3) 26 (2, 29) 3
*
*
Beltrami County 6 Rural 6.3 (3.5, 10.4) 25 (2, 29) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.0, 7.6)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.0, 10.1) 24 (3, 29) 4
*
*
Ramsey County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.7, 7.6) 23 (9, 28) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.0, 8.6) 22 (5, 29) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.6)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 6.7 (3.9, 10.7) 21 (2, 29) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.2)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 6.7 (6.1, 7.4) 20 (10, 26) 90 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Isanti County 6 Urban 6.8 (3.8, 11.3) 19 (2, 29) 3
*
*
Carver County 6 Urban 6.8 (4.8, 9.4) 18 (4, 29) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 2.1)
Wright County 6 Urban 7.0 (5.2, 9.3) 17 (3, 29) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.1)
Dakota County 6 Urban 7.2 (6.1, 8.4) 16 (6, 26) 34 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 12.7)
Steele County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.1, 12.0) 15 (1, 29) 3
*
*
Winona County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.1, 11.9) 14 (1, 29) 3
*
*
Anoka County 6 Urban 7.3 (6.1, 8.7) 13 (5, 26) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 7.4 (6.0, 9.0) 12 (4, 26) 22 stable stable trend -12.4 (-30.0, 3.2)
Rice County 6 Rural 7.4 (4.8, 10.9) 11 (2, 29) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 5.0)
Morrison County 6 Rural 7.7 (4.2, 13.0) 10 (1, 29) 3
*
*
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 8.3 (5.5, 12.0) 9 (1, 28) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 4.0)
Scott County 6 Urban 8.3 (6.3, 10.7) 8 (2, 26) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 5.3)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 8.5 (5.2, 13.1) 7 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Sherburne County 6 Urban 8.5 (6.1, 11.6) 6 (1, 27) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 5.5)
McLeod County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.5, 13.8) 5 (1, 29) 4 falling falling trend -15.4 (-35.9, -6.1)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 9.0 (6.0, 13.1) 4 (1, 28) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 6.3)
Clay County 6 Urban 10.6 (7.3, 14.9) 3 (1, 23) 7 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.1, 9.7)
Douglas County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.5, 17.0) 2 (1, 28) 4
*
*
Fillmore County 6 Urban 12.8 (7.7, 20.5) 1 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Aitkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Becker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freeborn County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Le Sueur County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mower County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/10/2024 2:27 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Aitkin, Becker, Benton, Big Stone, Brown, Carlton, Cass, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Dodge, Faribault, Freeborn, Grant, Houston, Hubbard, Jackson, Kanabec, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen, Marshall, Martin, Meeker, Mille Lacs, Mower, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Norman, Pennington, Pine, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Traverse, Wabasha, Wadena, Waseca, Watonwan, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top