Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 12.2 (11.8, 12.6) N/A 724 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.9, 13.0) N/A 44,379 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 9.8 (9.1, 10.6) 43 (31, 45) 134 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 0.5)
Dakota County 6 Urban 14.2 (12.6, 15.8) 19 (9, 31) 64 stable stable trend -2.6 (-11.5, 2.2)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 10.3 (9.1, 11.6) 42 (26, 45) 58 falling falling trend -3.8 (-11.4, -0.4)
Anoka County 6 Urban 12.1 (10.5, 13.8) 30 (16, 41) 45 stable stable trend -3.5 (-18.1, 1.6)
Olmsted County 6 Urban 18.9 (16.0, 22.2) 5 (1, 19) 31 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.4)
Washington County 6 Urban 11.2 (9.5, 13.2) 35 (18, 45) 31 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.1, 0.3)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 13.8 (11.5, 16.4) 21 (7, 37) 29 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.2, 9.9)
Scott County 6 Urban 14.8 (12.1, 17.9) 17 (5, 35) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Stearns County 6 Urban 12.7 (10.2, 15.6) 26 (9, 43) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.5)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 13.5 (10.4, 17.3) 24 (6, 43) 13 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 7.2)
Wright County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.0, 11.6) 46 (25, 46) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-12.8, 1.0)
Carver County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.2, 14.1) 38 (12, 46) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.7, 5.2)
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 16.4 (11.9, 22.0) 8 (1, 41) 11 rising rising trend 10.2 (5.8, 16.9)
Clay County 6 Urban 15.9 (11.6, 21.1) 11 (2, 41) 10
*
*
Becker County 6 Rural 25.0 (17.8, 34.0) 1 (1, 20) 9 rising rising trend 9.1 (5.2, 14.7)
Chisago County 6 Urban 15.1 (10.9, 20.4) 14 (2, 44) 9 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.1, 11.3)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 15.7 (11.0, 21.7) 12 (2, 43) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.2, 5.5)
Rice County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.4, 16.3) 31 (7, 46) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.5)
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 11.3 (7.8, 15.8) 33 (8, 46) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 21.4 (14.6, 30.1) 3 (1, 33) 7
*
*
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 11.0 (7.5, 15.5) 36 (9, 46) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-6.0, 11.2)
Douglas County 6 Rural 16.3 (10.9, 23.4) 9 (1, 45) 7
*
*
Carlton County 6 Urban 16.5 (11.1, 23.7) 7 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.2, 6.4)
McLeod County 6 Rural 16.0 (10.6, 23.1) 10 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.9)
Winona County 6 Rural 11.3 (7.2, 16.7) 34 (7, 46) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.7, 7.2)
Benton County 6 Urban 13.2 (8.5, 19.4) 25 (3, 46) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 6.0)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 23.8 (14.8, 36.1) 2 (1, 34) 5
*
*
Morrison County 6 Rural 15.1 (9.6, 22.6) 13 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Mower County 6 Rural 12.2 (7.8, 18.1) 28 (5, 46) 5 falling falling trend -23.7 (-37.3, -7.3)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 12.1 (7.7, 18.1) 29 (4, 46) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.3, 7.9)
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.9, 16.4) 37 (7, 46) 5 falling falling trend -6.1 (-22.5, -1.5)
Steele County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.2, 17.5) 32 (5, 46) 5
*
*
Freeborn County 6 Rural 13.6 (8.3, 21.0) 22 (2, 46) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.0, 8.5)
Cass County 6 Rural 14.4 (8.3, 22.9) 18 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.8, 7.3)
Itasca County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.8, 15.0) 44 (9, 46) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.9, 8.9)
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 14.0 (8.6, 21.5) 20 (2, 46) 4
*
*
Dodge County 6 Urban 19.6 (12.0, 30.2) 4 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Isanti County 6 Urban 10.5 (6.4, 16.2) 40 (7, 46) 4
*
*
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 13.6 (7.9, 21.7) 23 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.6)
Nicollet County 6 Urban 10.3 (6.0, 16.5) 41 (7, 46) 4 falling falling trend -9.1 (-38.7, -0.8)
Nobles County 6 Rural 14.9 (8.7, 23.8) 16 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Wabasha County 6 Urban 16.7 (9.4, 27.2) 6 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.3)
Brown County 6 Rural 12.5 (6.9, 20.6) 27 (2, 46) 3
*
*
Pine County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.0, 15.4) 45 (8, 46) 3
*
*
Fillmore County 6 Urban 15.1 (8.2, 25.2) 15 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Todd County 6 Rural 10.8 (5.8, 18.5) 39 (4, 46) 3
*
*
Aitkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 6:12 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Aitkin, Big Stone, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Faribault, Grant, Houston, Jackson, Kanabec, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen, Marshall, Martin, Meeker, Murray, Norman, Pennington, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Wadena, Waseca, Watonwan, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top