Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota 6 | N/A | 30.2 (29.4, 31.1) | N/A | 999 | stable | 2.6 (-0.3, 4.5) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) | N/A | 57,211 | stable | 1.5 (-1.1, 3.7) |
Fillmore County 6 | Urban | 51.1 (33.3, 75.1) | 1 (1, 40) | 6 | stable | 5.5 (0.0, 12.1) |
Waseca County 6 | Rural | 49.0 (31.5, 72.7) | 2 (1, 44) | 5 |
|
|
Lyon County 6 | Rural | 48.4 (32.7, 69.0) | 3 (1, 42) | 7 |
|
|
Watonwan County 6 | Rural | 48.4 (26.5, 81.5) | 4 (1, 50) | 3 |
|
|
Olmsted County 6 | Urban | 43.4 (37.4, 50.1) | 5 (1, 16) | 40 | stable | 1.8 (-0.1, 3.9) |
Dodge County 6 | Urban | 43.2 (27.0, 65.3) | 6 (1, 48) | 5 | stable | 2.5 (-0.6, 6.3) |
Douglas County 6 | Rural | 41.9 (30.2, 56.8) | 7 (1, 39) | 10 | rising | 5.4 (1.2, 10.6) |
Brown County 6 | Rural | 41.9 (28.0, 60.6) | 8 (1, 45) | 7 | stable | 6.3 (0.0, 14.7) |
Houston County 6 | Urban | 39.6 (24.6, 60.8) | 9 (1, 49) | 5 | stable | 1.0 (-4.5, 6.7) |
Benton County 6 | Urban | 36.8 (26.0, 50.7) | 10 (1, 47) | 8 | stable | 3.0 (-1.3, 8.8) |
Itasca County 6 | Rural | 36.7 (26.8, 49.3) | 11 (1, 45) | 11 | stable | 1.9 (-1.3, 5.3) |
Washington County 6 | Urban | 34.4 (30.4, 38.8) | 12 (6, 30) | 57 | rising | 1.4 (0.3, 2.6) |
Martin County 6 | Rural | 33.5 (20.5, 52.3) | 13 (1, 51) | 5 | stable | 1.8 (-2.7, 7.4) |
Dakota County 6 | Urban | 33.4 (30.2, 36.9) | 14 (7, 30) | 83 | falling | -2.6 (-6.2, -1.0) |
Ramsey County 6 | Urban | 31.7 (28.8, 34.7) | 15 (10, 34) | 98 | rising | 7.3 (0.8, 11.5) |
Hennepin County 6 | Urban | 31.4 (29.5, 33.4) | 16 (12, 30) | 224 | falling | -1.2 (-2.6, -0.4) |
Chisago County 6 | Urban | 31.1 (22.9, 41.4) | 17 (4, 48) | 10 | stable | 1.9 (-1.0, 5.3) |
Scott County 6 | Urban | 30.7 (25.4, 36.7) | 18 (7, 43) | 25 | stable | 1.5 (-2.4, 6.3) |
Sherburne County 6 | Urban | 30.4 (23.8, 38.3) | 19 (6, 46) | 15 | stable | 1.4 (-2.1, 5.6) |
Cass County 6 | Rural | 30.1 (18.8, 45.9) | 20 (2, 51) | 6 | stable | 2.1 (-2.0, 6.7) |
Polk County 6 | Urban | 30.0 (19.2, 44.7) | 21 (2, 51) | 5 | stable | 3.4 (-1.6, 9.4) |
Carver County 6 | Urban | 29.8 (23.9, 36.7) | 22 (7, 46) | 19 | stable | 1.6 (-1.1, 4.8) |
Nicollet County 6 | Urban | 29.5 (19.4, 43.1) | 23 (3, 50) | 6 | stable | 0.3 (-3.5, 4.6) |
Le Sueur County 6 | Urban | 29.4 (18.9, 44.0) | 24 (3, 51) | 5 | rising | 7.7 (2.6, 24.9) |
Rice County 6 | Rural | 29.1 (21.4, 38.6) | 25 (5, 49) | 10 | stable | 2.2 (-0.3, 5.0) |
Steele County 6 | Rural | 29.1 (19.6, 41.6) | 26 (4, 50) | 7 | stable | -1.1 (-5.4, 3.2) |
Freeborn County 6 | Rural | 28.5 (18.7, 42.1) | 27 (3, 51) | 6 | stable | 3.6 (-1.0, 9.1) |
Beltrami County 6 | Rural | 28.4 (18.9, 40.7) | 28 (4, 51) | 6 | rising | 5.0 (1.2, 9.9) |
Stearns County 6 | Urban | 28.3 (23.1, 34.4) | 29 (9, 46) | 23 | stable | 1.0 (-1.9, 4.0) |
Nobles County 6 | Rural | 28.2 (15.9, 46.2) | 30 (2, 51) | 3 |
|
|
Mille Lacs County 6 | Urban | 27.9 (16.8, 43.6) | 31 (3, 51) | 4 |
|
|
Crow Wing County 6 | Rural | 27.8 (20.2, 37.2) | 32 (6, 49) | 11 | stable | -3.9 (-25.7, 1.0) |
Todd County 6 | Rural | 27.7 (16.6, 43.6) | 33 (3, 51) | 5 |
|
|
Anoka County 6 | Urban | 27.2 (24.1, 30.7) | 34 (17, 44) | 58 | stable | -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9) |
Isanti County 6 | Urban | 26.7 (17.6, 38.8) | 35 (5, 51) | 6 | stable | -0.4 (-5.4, 5.5) |
Clay County 6 | Urban | 26.5 (18.9, 36.1) | 36 (7, 51) | 8 | stable | 0.0 (-3.1, 3.3) |
Otter Tail County 6 | Rural | 26.5 (19.2, 35.7) | 37 (8, 50) | 11 | stable | 1.5 (-2.9, 6.3) |
Goodhue County 6 | Rural | 26.3 (18.7, 36.2) | 38 (8, 50) | 9 | stable | -1.4 (-6.0, 3.1) |
Wright County 6 | Urban | 26.1 (21.1, 32.0) | 39 (13, 48) | 20 | stable | 0.2 (-2.2, 3.0) |
Winona County 6 | Rural | 25.5 (17.5, 36.2) | 40 (7, 51) | 7 | stable | 0.2 (-3.9, 4.3) |
Blue Earth County 6 | Urban | 25.1 (18.1, 33.9) | 41 (9, 51) | 9 | stable | -1.2 (-5.1, 2.9) |
Becker County 6 | Rural | 24.8 (16.6, 36.2) | 42 (7, 51) | 7 | stable | 0.5 (-3.3, 4.8) |
St. Louis County 6 | Urban | 24.8 (20.7, 29.5) | 43 (19, 49) | 31 | stable | 2.7 (-4.1, 16.3) |
Carlton County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (14.2, 35.9) | 44 (7, 51) | 5 |
|
|
Wabasha County 6 | Urban | 22.2 (12.6, 37.2) | 45 (6, 51) | 4 |
|
|
Mower County 6 | Rural | 21.5 (14.1, 31.8) | 46 (14, 51) | 6 | stable | -5.1 (-39.5, 0.5) |
Kandiyohi County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (13.6, 31.4) | 47 (12, 51) | 6 | stable | -3.3 (-8.9, 1.4) |
Aitkin County 6 | Rural | 21.0 (11.8, 38.5) | 48 (8, 51) | 3 |
|
|
Pine County 6 | Rural | 19.4 (10.7, 32.7) | 49 (10, 51) | 3 |
|
|
McLeod County 6 | Rural | 17.1 (10.2, 27.2) | 50 (23, 51) | 4 | stable | -0.6 (-6.9, 6.1) |
Morrison County 6 | Rural | 14.8 (8.3, 24.8) | 51 (28, 51) | 3 | stable | -1.3 (-6.8, 4.1) |
Big Stone County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Chippewa County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearwater County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Cook County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Cottonwood County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Faribault County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Hubbard County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Kanabec County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Kittson County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Koochiching County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Lac qui Parle County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Lake County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Lake of the Woods County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Mahnomen County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Marshall County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Meeker County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Murray County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Norman County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Pennington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Pipestone County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Pope County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Red Lake County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Renville County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Rock County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
Roseau County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Sibley County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Stevens County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Swift County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Traverse County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Wadena County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilkin County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Yellow Medicine County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:34 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Big Stone, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Faribault, Grant, Hubbard, Jackson, Kanabec, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Lincoln, Mahnomen, Marshall, Meeker, Murray, Norman, Pennington, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Wadena, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:34 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Big Stone, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Faribault, Grant, Hubbard, Jackson, Kanabec, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Lincoln, Mahnomen, Marshall, Meeker, Murray, Norman, Pennington, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Wadena, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.