Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 68.9 (67.7, 70.1) N/A 2,595 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Tunica County 6 Urban 96.5 (70.2, 129.4) 1 (1, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.2)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 93.6 (74.5, 116.6) 2 (1, 55) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Quitman County 6 Rural 91.8 (65.5, 126.4) 3 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.2)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 86.8 (70.7, 106.0) 4 (1, 62) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.6)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 84.3 (71.0, 99.7) 5 (1, 55) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
Marshall County 6 Urban 84.0 (72.5, 97.0) 6 (1, 51) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.6)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 83.9 (69.3, 101.0) 7 (1, 59) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.0)
Covington County 6 Rural 83.8 (68.3, 102.1) 8 (1, 63) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Panola County 6 Rural 83.7 (71.8, 97.0) 9 (1, 53) 37 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.9)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 83.4 (69.2, 99.8) 10 (1, 62) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Perry County 6 Urban 83.2 (64.3, 106.5) 11 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend -2.4 (-17.4, 0.5)
Tate County 6 Urban 82.1 (69.4, 96.8) 12 (1, 59) 30 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.6)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 82.0 (69.3, 96.4) 13 (1, 60) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.8)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 81.1 (63.8, 102.2) 14 (1, 73) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 79.7 (66.5, 95.1) 15 (1, 64) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.2)
Smith County 6 Rural 79.5 (62.8, 99.8) 16 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 79.3 (68.7, 91.3) 17 (2, 59) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Stone County 6 Urban 79.1 (63.1, 98.2) 18 (1, 71) 18 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.4)
Marion County 6 Rural 78.8 (65.6, 94.1) 19 (1, 65) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Scott County 6 Urban 78.2 (65.4, 92.9) 20 (1, 67) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Simpson County 6 Urban 78.0 (65.6, 92.5) 21 (1, 65) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Harrison County 6 Urban 77.9 (73.0, 83.1) 22 (7, 44) 199 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Lee County 6 Rural 77.2 (69.5, 85.5) 23 (5, 55) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Tippah County 6 Rural 77.1 (63.4, 93.1) 24 (1, 69) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.9)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 77.0 (59.1, 99.1) 25 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 5.2)
Union County 6 Rural 77.0 (64.5, 91.4) 26 (1, 67) 27 stable stable trend -7.0 (-22.6, 2.6)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 76.9 (62.3, 94.0) 27 (1, 73) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 3.9)
Leflore County 6 Rural 76.5 (63.5, 91.5) 28 (1, 68) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.5)
Grenada County 6 Rural 76.0 (62.4, 91.9) 29 (1, 72) 23 stable stable trend -2.9 (-23.9, 1.9)
Forrest County 6 Urban 75.5 (67.2, 84.5) 30 (4, 60) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 73.8 (63.3, 85.7) 31 (3, 66) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 73.1 (56.8, 93.6) 32 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 3.0)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 72.9 (64.7, 82.0) 33 (7, 64) 60 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.4, -1.9)
Jackson County 6 Urban 72.6 (67.1, 78.5) 34 (12, 56) 133 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 72.3 (54.2, 95.4) 35 (1, 79) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 72.3 (50.4, 101.3) 36 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.8, 4.1)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 71.8 (61.1, 83.9) 37 (4, 70) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.0)
Hancock County 6 Urban 70.9 (62.3, 80.6) 38 (8, 68) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.7)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 70.7 (65.4, 76.3) 39 (18, 59) 138 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Leake County 6 Rural 70.4 (57.1, 86.0) 40 (3, 76) 20 falling falling trend -10.8 (-26.9, -0.4)
Attala County 6 Rural 70.3 (56.4, 87.1) 41 (3, 78) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.6)
Clarke County 6 Rural 70.3 (55.5, 88.2) 42 (2, 79) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.4)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 69.5 (48.2, 97.7) 43 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.7, 2.0)
Webster County 6 Rural 69.4 (50.6, 93.4) 44 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.7)
Hinds County 6 Urban 69.1 (64.6, 73.8) 45 (23, 59) 187 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 69.0 (51.8, 90.6) 46 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.0)
Jasper County 6 Rural 67.8 (53.6, 85.0) 47 (3, 80) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Washington County 6 Rural 67.4 (58.1, 78.0) 48 (12, 73) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.9)
Carroll County 6 Rural 66.7 (49.5, 89.2) 49 (2, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 66.3 (56.7, 77.3) 50 (11, 76) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Copiah County 6 Urban 66.0 (54.8, 79.0) 51 (7, 78) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Jones County 6 Rural 65.9 (58.4, 74.2) 52 (18, 73) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Newton County 6 Rural 65.9 (52.8, 81.4) 53 (7, 78) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 64.6 (43.4, 93.2) 54 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.8, 5.3)
Amite County 6 Rural 64.4 (49.4, 83.4) 55 (4, 80) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.1)
Warren County 6 Rural 63.9 (54.9, 74.0) 56 (19, 77) 38 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Holmes County 6 Urban 63.2 (48.8, 80.8) 57 (6, 81) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.3)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 62.1 (51.4, 74.5) 58 (15, 79) 25 stable stable trend -19.5 (-39.5, 0.3)
Walthall County 6 Rural 61.3 (46.6, 79.6) 59 (6, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.2)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 61.1 (53.3, 69.8) 60 (27, 77) 46 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
George County 6 Rural 61.0 (48.0, 76.5) 61 (11, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.5)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 60.8 (43.3, 84.5) 62 (3, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.6, 7.1)
Rankin County 6 Urban 60.2 (55.3, 65.4) 63 (43, 74) 116 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Sharkey County 6 Rural 59.4 (34.4, 98.4) 64 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-9.4, 1.8)
Winston County 6 Rural 59.4 (47.0, 74.6) 65 (13, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.5)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 59.0 (52.4, 66.3) 66 (40, 78) 60 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Wayne County 6 Rural 58.2 (45.6, 73.6) 67 (13, 81) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 58.1 (42.5, 77.8) 68 (6, 81) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 1.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 56.8 (39.2, 81.0) 69 (7, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.5, 4.8)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 56.7 (45.1, 70.3) 70 (23, 81) 17 stable stable trend -21.5 (-45.2, 2.8)
Clay County 6 Rural 56.1 (43.8, 71.0) 71 (20, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 3.1)
Lamar County 6 Urban 56.0 (48.3, 64.7) 72 (41, 80) 39 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Kemper County 6 Rural 55.6 (39.0, 78.0) 73 (9, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 2.9)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 53.8 (43.4, 66.0) 74 (34, 81) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.1)
Adams County 6 Rural 52.8 (43.5, 63.9) 75 (42, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.6)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 52.6 (36.2, 74.4) 76 (11, 81) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.3, 2.9)
Madison County 6 Urban 51.2 (45.5, 57.5) 77 (59, 80) 61 falling falling trend -3.8 (-9.2, -2.3)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 51.1 (42.9, 60.6) 78 (49, 81) 29 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.2)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 47.8 (31.8, 70.1) 79 (18, 81) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.6, 2.0)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 46.6 (30.6, 68.9) 80 (17, 81) 6 falling falling trend -21.0 (-53.2, -3.3)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 40.1 (32.1, 49.4) 81 (69, 81) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/13/2024 1:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top