Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 124.6 (122.3, 127.0) N/A 2,308 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 129.8 (129.5, 130.0) N/A 258,398 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Adams County 6 Rural 116.1 (93.9, 142.2) 51 (9, 80) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 126.0 (105.5, 149.6) 37 (6, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-21.8, 5.4)
Amite County 6 Rural 98.1 (71.0, 133.6) 75 (10, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 1.9)
Attala County 6 Rural 128.7 (101.1, 162.1) 30 (2, 77) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.6)
Benton County 6 Urban 134.4 (90.9, 192.7) 22 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Bolivar County 6 Rural 106.6 (86.8, 129.8) 68 (16, 81) 22 stable stable trend -6.0 (-25.3, 0.9)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 109.2 (80.7, 145.4) 63 (5, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 4.9)
Carroll County 6 Rural 113.2 (81.1, 156.4) 55 (4, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 4.5)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 126.1 (97.4, 160.9) 36 (3, 79) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.0)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 113.8 (77.4, 163.2) 54 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.9)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 131.6 (88.2, 188.7) 24 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.7, 11.1)
Clarke County 6 Rural 98.0 (72.2, 130.6) 76 (11, 81) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Clay County 6 Rural 130.1 (102.4, 163.3) 27 (3, 77) 17 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 6.0)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 119.3 (94.8, 148.5) 47 (6, 79) 17 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.9, 5.8)
Copiah County 6 Urban 126.4 (103.5, 153.1) 35 (4, 76) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
Covington County 6 Rural 142.3 (112.3, 178.2) 12 (2, 74) 16 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 7.8)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 122.4 (112.9, 132.5) 43 (19, 63) 126 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Forrest County 6 Urban 119.7 (105.0, 136.0) 46 (12, 74) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.3)
Franklin County 6 Rural 84.7 (53.1, 130.4) 80 (13, 81) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.2, 3.4)
George County 6 Rural 86.3 (65.9, 111.4) 79 (36, 81) 13 stable stable trend -3.0 (-16.0, 0.1)
Greene County 6 Rural 99.5 (68.5, 140.5) 73 (7, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.7)
Grenada County 6 Rural 158.7 (129.6, 192.7) 5 (1, 56) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.6)
Hancock County 6 Urban 136.1 (117.8, 156.8) 19 (4, 62) 45 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.3, 11.9)
Harrison County 6 Urban 112.8 (104.4, 121.7) 57 (33, 72) 143 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 0.4)
Hinds County 6 Urban 136.7 (127.9, 145.9) 18 (8, 43) 193 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 5.0)
Holmes County 6 Urban 140.4 (108.8, 178.5) 15 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.6, 5.7)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 196.5 (143.4, 263.4) 1 (1, 57) 10 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.8, 8.3)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 127.4 (102.3, 157.0) 32 (3, 79) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.6)
Jackson County 6 Urban 121.9 (111.6, 132.9) 44 (18, 65) 110 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8)
Jasper County 6 Rural 111.7 (85.0, 144.9) 59 (5, 81) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.5)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 145.0 (100.6, 204.3) 9 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.3, 7.6)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 99.0 (71.0, 135.9) 74 (12, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.0)
Jones County 6 Rural 112.0 (97.7, 127.9) 58 (20, 77) 49 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Kemper County 6 Rural 144.3 (98.1, 204.7) 10 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.5, 10.3)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 135.8 (116.6, 157.3) 20 (4, 65) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.8)
Lamar County 6 Urban 113.2 (97.9, 130.1) 56 (18, 77) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.2)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 100.1 (87.3, 114.3) 72 (39, 80) 49 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 96.1 (67.4, 133.8) 78 (8, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.8, 4.1)
Leake County 6 Rural 108.8 (84.3, 138.5) 64 (8, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
Lee County 6 Rural 141.2 (126.7, 157.0) 13 (4, 50) 73 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Leflore County 6 Rural 134.7 (110.4, 162.9) 21 (3, 72) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 4.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 107.8 (89.4, 129.2) 66 (17, 80) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.3)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 132.6 (116.1, 150.8) 23 (6, 64) 50 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 160.9 (147.0, 175.9) 4 (1, 20) 104 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 8.6)
Marion County 6 Rural 126.7 (103.1, 154.4) 34 (4, 77) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.9)
Marshall County 6 Urban 125.6 (104.3, 150.2) 38 (6, 76) 28 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.6, 5.0)
Monroe County 6 Rural 155.9 (132.8, 181.9) 6 (1, 44) 37 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 6.4)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 150.1 (110.8, 200.0) 7 (1, 76) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 6.6)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 106.3 (85.0, 131.4) 69 (14, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.6)
Newton County 6 Rural 111.5 (86.8, 141.4) 60 (7, 81) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.5)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 125.3 (87.6, 173.8) 39 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 4.9)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 105.4 (86.6, 127.1) 70 (20, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 2.9)
Panola County 6 Rural 111.1 (90.6, 134.8) 61 (13, 80) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-12.1, 1.8)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 129.2 (112.5, 147.8) 29 (7, 68) 49 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.7)
Perry County 6 Urban 97.7 (66.8, 138.5) 77 (8, 81) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.6, 1.1)
Pike County 6 Rural 124.5 (105.5, 146.1) 40 (7, 74) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 124.1 (101.5, 150.3) 41 (5, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 108.8 (85.8, 136.2) 65 (8, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6)
Quitman County 6 Rural 165.5 (114.5, 233.2) 3 (1, 77) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.0, 10.8)
Rankin County 6 Urban 122.7 (112.9, 133.1) 42 (17, 63) 121 stable stable trend 7.1 (-0.2, 12.3)
Scott County 6 Urban 107.4 (85.5, 133.4) 67 (14, 81) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.7)
Sharkey County 6 Rural 127.4 (72.5, 211.3) 31 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend 23.4 (-4.5, 54.2)
Simpson County 6 Urban 127.0 (103.6, 154.6) 33 (4, 76) 22 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.7)
Smith County 6 Rural 138.3 (105.6, 178.5) 17 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.1, 8.2)
Stone County 6 Urban 101.5 (76.2, 133.1) 71 (12, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.6)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 129.5 (103.7, 160.1) 28 (3, 77) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 5.1)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 146.0 (106.8, 194.9) 8 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.0)
Tate County 6 Urban 116.1 (94.1, 142.0) 50 (8, 80) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Tippah County 6 Rural 109.3 (85.4, 138.2) 62 (11, 81) 15 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 6.0)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 190.2 (155.8, 230.3) 2 (1, 25) 24 rising rising trend 6.8 (3.8, 10.7)
Tunica County 6 Urban 116.0 (78.1, 166.0) 52 (2, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.5)
Union County 6 Rural 118.3 (95.4, 145.1) 48 (7, 79) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.0)
Walthall County 6 Rural 141.2 (107.5, 182.6) 14 (1, 76) 13 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.3, 7.4)
Warren County 6 Rural 131.4 (112.6, 152.6) 25 (5, 69) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 143.1 (123.7, 164.8) 11 (3, 57) 43 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.2, 3.7)
Wayne County 6 Rural 120.4 (93.5, 152.9) 45 (4, 80) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 6.0)
Webster County 6 Rural 118.1 (81.5, 166.0) 49 (3, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 5.4)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 114.7 (77.7, 165.3) 53 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.3)
Winston County 6 Rural 77.8 (56.3, 105.4) 81 (47, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 3.7)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 131.4 (98.2, 173.0) 26 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 10.9)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 138.9 (111.3, 171.4) 16 (2, 74) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.1)
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 12:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top