Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 469.5 (466.2, 472.7) N/A 16,949 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Benton County 6 Urban 442.6 (384.6, 507.4) 65 (4, 82) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Copiah County 6 Urban 458.9 (427.2, 492.5) 52 (11, 79) 170 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.4, -0.6)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 446.6 (433.2, 460.4) 62 (42, 74) 871 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.4, -1.0)
Forrest County 6 Urban 497.7 (475.7, 520.5) 22 (6, 50) 400 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Hancock County 6 Urban 476.1 (451.8, 501.6) 39 (10, 67) 317 stable stable trend -5.7 (-12.6, 0.8)
Harrison County 6 Urban 485.2 (472.7, 498.1) 33 (15, 49) 1,195 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hinds County 6 Urban 489.8 (477.5, 502.3) 28 (12, 46) 1,285 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Holmes County 6 Urban 522.6 (477.7, 570.7) 6 (1, 60) 106 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 Urban 476.6 (461.9, 491.6) 38 (17, 58) 847 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 4.3)
Lamar County 6 Urban 458.3 (435.7, 481.8) 54 (22, 74) 320 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 4.4)
Madison County 6 Urban 489.6 (471.7, 508.1) 29 (9, 52) 597 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 4.7)
Marshall County 6 Urban 469.6 (441.1, 499.7) 44 (11, 73) 218 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.0, 0.6)
Perry County 6 Urban 505.5 (455.1, 560.4) 13 (1, 72) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Rankin County 6 Urban 431.9 (418.4, 445.7) 73 (53, 79) 803 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.8, -0.5)
Scott County 6 Urban 449.8 (417.4, 484.2) 60 (18, 81) 150 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.7, -0.7)
Simpson County 6 Urban 497.0 (463.0, 532.9) 23 (3, 63) 170 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Stone County 6 Urban 468.4 (427.7, 512.0) 46 (5, 80) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Tate County 6 Urban 459.0 (426.8, 493.1) 51 (12, 79) 160 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 0.5)
Tunica County 6 Urban 516.0 (453.2, 585.0) 9 (1, 77) 53 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 509.4 (472.8, 548.0) 12 (2, 60) 149 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 6.6)
Adams County 6 Rural 429.7 (401.0, 460.1) 74 (32, 82) 183 falling falling trend -1.4 (-7.8, -0.2)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 448.5 (421.0, 477.6) 61 (25, 79) 208 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.6, -1.6)
Amite County 6 Rural 438.2 (394.7, 485.6) 67 (16, 82) 89 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Attala County 6 Rural 472.6 (433.8, 514.1) 41 (4, 79) 116 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 451.2 (420.6, 483.6) 59 (21, 80) 172 falling falling trend -10.8 (-17.3, -6.1)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 501.3 (454.0, 552.5) 17 (2, 73) 90 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.6)
Carroll County 6 Rural 452.7 (404.1, 506.4) 57 (7, 82) 72 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 3.0)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 518.8 (476.3, 564.3) 7 (1, 60) 116 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 426.6 (373.9, 485.4) 75 (9, 82) 53 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.2)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 432.7 (375.7, 496.1) 72 (7, 82) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Clarke County 6 Rural 446.0 (405.9, 489.2) 63 (13, 82) 100 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Clay County 6 Rural 472.4 (434.0, 513.5) 42 (5, 78) 121 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.5)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 543.8 (502.6, 587.5) 3 (1, 38) 140 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.8)
Covington County 6 Rural 539.7 (497.2, 585.1) 5 (1, 43) 125 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Franklin County 6 Rural 421.6 (367.1, 482.7) 78 (7, 82) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
George County 6 Rural 412.0 (377.7, 448.7) 79 (45, 82) 115 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 2.0)
Greene County 6 Rural 392.7 (350.4, 439.0) 82 (46, 82) 64 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.8)
Grenada County 6 Rural 516.9 (478.6, 557.7) 8 (1, 57) 145 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 541.6 (476.4, 613.6) 4 (1, 67) 54 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.3, 11.0)
Issaquena County 6 Rural 490.0 (343.9, 688.9) 27 (1, 82) 8 rising rising trend 31.9 (6.0, 59.1)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 486.1 (451.2, 523.2) 32 (4, 70) 149 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Jasper County 6 Rural 463.8 (423.1, 507.6) 47 (6, 80) 106 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 498.0 (434.5, 568.8) 21 (1, 81) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.4)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 494.5 (445.3, 548.2) 26 (2, 77) 85 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Jones County 6 Rural 458.7 (437.7, 480.4) 53 (21, 72) 385 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Kemper County 6 Rural 423.4 (371.1, 481.6) 77 (11, 82) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 407.1 (382.8, 432.6) 80 (59, 82) 220 falling falling trend -3.0 (-11.2, -0.4)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 424.7 (405.7, 444.4) 76 (53, 81) 401 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 504.7 (454.4, 559.3) 14 (1, 73) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Leake County 6 Rural 434.1 (398.6, 472.0) 71 (23, 82) 117 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Lee County 6 Rural 512.7 (492.4, 533.7) 10 (4, 38) 498 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 3.0)
Leflore County 6 Rural 498.3 (463.2, 535.3) 20 (3, 64) 159 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 0.3)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 443.2 (415.2, 472.6) 64 (27, 80) 198 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 460.5 (438.0, 483.9) 50 (21, 75) 332 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.1, 5.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 482.6 (448.4, 518.8) 35 (5, 71) 159 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.0, 0.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 504.5 (475.3, 535.2) 15 (3, 55) 240 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 496.6 (444.5, 553.8) 24 (2, 78) 73 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 438.2 (406.5, 471.7) 66 (22, 82) 150 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Newton County 6 Rural 454.1 (417.3, 493.4) 55 (11, 81) 118 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 452.4 (399.0, 511.1) 58 (4, 82) 57 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 403.9 (377.2, 432.1) 81 (58, 82) 180 stable stable trend -0.5 (-10.6, 3.6)
Panola County 6 Rural 482.8 (452.6, 514.6) 34 (7, 68) 202 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 0.5)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 499.5 (476.1, 523.8) 19 (5, 50) 374 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Pike County 6 Rural 486.9 (459.1, 516.0) 30 (7, 64) 244 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 501.3 (468.4, 536.0) 18 (3, 60) 180 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 463.6 (429.9, 499.4) 48 (10, 79) 149 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.2, -2.6)
Quitman County 6 Rural 626.5 (549.7, 711.6) 1 (1, 19) 52 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Sharkey County 6 Rural 469.1 (386.0, 566.2) 45 (1, 82) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-20.5, 3.0)
Smith County 6 Rural 511.4 (466.2, 560.3) 11 (1, 67) 102 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.8)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 473.4 (438.3, 510.7) 40 (6, 77) 141 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.5)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 486.2 (437.5, 539.1) 31 (2, 79) 76 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.4)
Tippah County 6 Rural 453.4 (417.6, 491.7) 56 (14, 81) 125 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 547.2 (506.7, 590.3) 2 (1, 36) 147 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.2)
Union County 6 Rural 495.7 (461.9, 531.4) 25 (3, 65) 166 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Walthall County 6 Rural 478.9 (434.2, 527.3) 37 (3, 79) 92 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.5)
Warren County 6 Rural 435.2 (410.4, 461.2) 69 (37, 81) 249 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 480.9 (454.6, 508.3) 36 (8, 66) 275 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 437.7 (400.6, 477.4) 68 (21, 82) 110 falling falling trend -7.1 (-13.4, -0.5)
Webster County 6 Rural 462.2 (410.0, 519.5) 49 (3, 82) 62 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 471.4 (415.4, 533.3) 43 (2, 81) 55 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Winston County 6 Rural 434.3 (397.3, 474.1) 70 (22, 82) 111 falling falling trend -1.1 (-6.5, -0.4)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 502.3 (454.7, 553.9) 16 (2, 74) 91 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 10:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top