Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6,8 *** 106.5 (104.4, 108.7) 1,895 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 *** 105.4 (105.2, 105.6) 208,732 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Hinds County 6,8 *** 110.4 (102.7, 118.5) 155 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
DeSoto County 6,8 *** 107.1 (98.9, 115.9) 125 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.6)
Harrison County 6,8 *** 101.1 (93.2, 109.6) 122 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Rankin County 6,8 *** 106.1 (97.2, 115.6) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Jackson County 6,8 *** 97.6 (88.5, 107.4) 85 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Madison County 6,8 *** 117.5 (106.0, 129.9) 77 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Lee County 6,8 *** 104.8 (92.8, 118.0) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Forrest County 6,8 *** 118.7 (104.4, 134.4) 51 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.8)
Lauderdale County 6,8 *** 97.3 (84.9, 110.9) 45 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Jones County 6,8 *** 95.0 (81.8, 109.7) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Pearl River County 6,8 *** 118.5 (102.0, 136.8) 37 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Lowndes County 6,8 *** 105.8 (90.9, 122.3) 37 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.7)
Lamar County 6,8 *** 91.6 (78.6, 106.1) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 1.9)
Hancock County 6,8 *** 119.4 (101.6, 139.5) 32 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.6)
Warren County 6,8 *** 112.7 (95.6, 131.9) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Lafayette County 6,8 *** 97.5 (81.8, 115.2) 29 stable stable trend 9.0 (-1.7, 20.8)
Washington County 6,8 *** 106.7 (89.8, 125.7) 29 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 4.7)
Alcorn County 6,8 *** 114.8 (96.0, 136.3) 26 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.4)
Monroe County 6,8 *** 123.4 (102.9, 146.9) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.0)
Bolivar County 6,8 *** 128.0 (105.6, 153.5) 23 stable stable trend -12.2 (-32.6, 14.3)
Panola County 6,8 *** 116.9 (96.5, 140.3) 23 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.3, 5.8)
Leflore County 6,8 *** 139.2 (114.5, 167.4) 23 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 5.8)
Oktibbeha County 6,8 *** 102.0 (83.3, 123.3) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.2)
Union County 6,8 *** 125.4 (103.0, 151.2) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Pike County 6,8 *** 94.7 (77.5, 114.5) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Scott County 6,8 *** 127.6 (104.5, 154.2) 21 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.0)
Lincoln County 6,8 *** 102.1 (83.6, 123.5) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Marshall County 6,8 *** 99.6 (81.4, 120.5) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.5)
Neshoba County 6,8 *** 120.9 (98.5, 146.8) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 5.1)
Tishomingo County 6,8 *** 161.9 (130.1, 199.1) 18 rising rising trend 11.5 (3.6, 20.0)
Sunflower County 6,8 *** 106.0 (85.0, 130.6) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.0)
Tate County 6,8 *** 108.8 (87.3, 134.0) 18 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.4, 5.0)
Copiah County 6,8 *** 110.7 (88.5, 136.6) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Pontotoc County 6,8 *** 89.3 (71.1, 110.6) 17 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.2)
Prentiss County 6,8 *** 113.3 (90.2, 140.3) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.2)
Itawamba County 6,8 *** 115.2 (91.5, 143.2) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.4, 5.1)
Yazoo County 6,8 *** 91.8 (72.8, 114.3) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.1)
Adams County 6,8 *** 86.9 (68.9, 108.2) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.2)
Simpson County 6,8 *** 102.5 (81.2, 127.6) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.9)
Coahoma County 6,8 *** 112.0 (87.6, 140.7) 15 falling falling trend -11.4 (-20.6, -1.2)
Marion County 6,8 *** 98.3 (77.0, 123.5) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.3)
Newton County 6,8 *** 114.0 (89.1, 143.5) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.6)
Tippah County 6,8 *** 104.6 (81.4, 132.2) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Holmes County 6,8 *** 139.4 (107.9, 176.6) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.8, 5.3)
Covington County 6,8 *** 122.1 (94.6, 154.9) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Leake County 6,8 *** 100.3 (77.6, 127.3) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
George County 6,8 *** 90.7 (69.9, 115.6) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.4)
Grenada County 6,8 *** 101.2 (77.8, 129.3) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.1)
Smith County 6,8 *** 126.2 (95.7, 163.2) 12 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.1, 7.9)
Clay County 6,8 *** 101.2 (76.6, 131.2) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Greene County 6,8 *** 118.1 (89.2, 153.5) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.5, 6.9)
Calhoun County 6,8 *** 132.2 (99.6, 171.8) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.4)
Jasper County 6,8 *** 108.3 (80.2, 142.9) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 4.8)
Attala County 6,8 *** 89.7 (66.0, 119.0) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.8, 4.0)
Stone County 6,8 *** 90.0 (66.0, 119.6) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.7)
Lawrence County 6,8 *** 125.9 (92.0, 168.1) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.5)
Winston County 6,8 *** 87.5 (64.0, 116.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Wayne County 6,8 *** 76.6 (55.6, 102.8) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.0, 2.5)
Jefferson Davis County 6,8 *** 127.2 (91.5, 172.2) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.6)
Tallahatchie County 6,8 *** 87.9 (63.1, 119.2) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Walthall County 6,8 *** 101.1 (72.8, 136.6) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.1, 7.9)
Yalobusha County 6,8 *** 117.2 (84.0, 159.0) 8 stable stable trend -9.8 (-19.2, 0.7)
Clarke County 6,8 *** 88.3 (62.9, 120.3) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.7, -0.4)
Perry County 6,8 *** 106.4 (75.2, 146.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.3)
Webster County 6,8 *** 134.8 (95.1, 185.2) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.0, 5.9)
Amite County 6,8 *** 110.8 (77.4, 153.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 3.7)
Chickasaw County 6,8 *** 76.2 (53.2, 105.3) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Franklin County 6,8 *** 155.0 (107.1, 216.8) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 4.9)
Noxubee County 6,8 *** 112.0 (77.3, 156.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 4.7)
Montgomery County 6,8 *** 108.7 (74.2, 153.8) 6 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.1)
Tunica County 6,8 *** 99.7 (67.1, 142.0) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.6, 5.7)
Humphreys County 6,8 *** 109.8 (71.1, 161.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.6, 3.3)
Claiborne County 6,8 *** 109.3 (69.7, 162.0) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 5.9)
Wilkinson County 6,8 *** 100.9 (65.1, 148.6) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.9, 3.6)
Carroll County 6,8 *** 81.9 (51.8, 123.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.5)
Benton County 6 *** 85.9 (53.6, 130.6) 4
*
*
Kemper County 6,8 *** 73.8 (45.4, 113.1) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.0)
Choctaw County 6,8 *** 84.7 (51.6, 130.9) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.6, 8.2)
Quitman County 6,8 *** 87.4 (52.5, 136.3) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.2, 6.0)
Jefferson County 6 *** 85.8 (50.6, 135.4) 4
*
*
Sharkey County 6,8 *** 136.8 (77.9, 221.0) 3 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.3, 10.6)
Issaquena County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/30/2020 9:06 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top