Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 2,035.4 (2,016.9, 2,053.9) N/A 9,588 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 1,901.4 (1,742.9, 2,070.4) 62 (21, 80) 109 stable stable trend -1.8 (-12.7, 0.0)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 2,048.5 (1,893.0, 2,213.6) 41 (7, 72) 130 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Amite County 6 Rural 1,738.7 (1,533.6, 1,963.9) 79 (29, 82) 53 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Attala County 6 Rural 2,213.4 (1,993.3, 2,451.2) 14 (1, 68) 75 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 1,911.4 (1,740.0, 2,095.3) 60 (16, 80) 96 falling falling trend -8.9 (-16.7, -1.0)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 2,113.8 (1,865.6, 2,385.6) 26 (1, 77) 53 falling falling trend -2.4 (-7.5, -0.5)
Carroll County 6 Rural 1,849.7 (1,609.6, 2,115.8) 67 (10, 82) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 2.0)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 2,410.2 (2,166.3, 2,674.2) 2 (1, 44) 72 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.3)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 1,590.2 (1,340.6, 1,872.7) 81 (39, 82) 29 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 4.0)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 1,780.1 (1,484.5, 2,117.3) 75 (8, 82) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Clarke County 6 Rural 2,020.8 (1,803.3, 2,257.5) 45 (4, 79) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Clay County 6 Rural 2,090.2 (1,876.8, 2,321.4) 31 (3, 75) 72 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 0.3)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 2,214.6 (1,989.2, 2,458.6) 13 (1, 65) 73 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.9, 4.0)
Covington County 6 Rural 2,368.3 (2,128.9, 2,627.4) 4 (1, 46) 72 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 1,789.2 (1,501.1, 2,116.9) 72 (9, 82) 28 falling falling trend -7.8 (-29.1, -0.2)
George County 6 Rural 1,742.0 (1,542.6, 1,960.7) 78 (29, 82) 61 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Greene County 6 Rural 1,748.0 (1,498.6, 2,027.5) 77 (15, 82) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.6)
Grenada County 6 Rural 1,966.2 (1,770.4, 2,177.8) 51 (7, 79) 75 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 2,224.5 (1,879.0, 2,615.7) 11 (1, 77) 30 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.7)
Issaquena County 6 Rural 2,600.8 (1,662.0, 3,865.4) 1 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Itawamba County 6 Rural 2,142.5 (1,947.1, 2,352.3) 22 (2, 68) 89 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Jasper County 6 Rural 1,855.2 (1,651.4, 2,077.3) 66 (18, 82) 61 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 2,127.5 (1,777.0, 2,527.1) 24 (1, 82) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 1,831.3 (1,604.9, 2,081.1) 69 (14, 82) 48 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Jones County 6 Rural 1,929.9 (1,816.0, 2,049.0) 58 (25, 77) 219 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Kemper County 6 Rural 1,652.9 (1,397.9, 1,940.6) 80 (31, 82) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.0)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 1,789.2 (1,647.4, 1,940.1) 73 (38, 82) 123 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 1,788.5 (1,685.4, 1,896.2) 74 (49, 81) 229 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 2,158.3 (1,885.4, 2,459.8) 20 (1, 77) 46 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.9, 11.8)
Leake County 6 Rural 1,910.3 (1,711.3, 2,126.1) 61 (12, 81) 69 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.3, -0.5)
Lee County 6 Rural 2,323.6 (2,203.1, 2,449.0) 6 (1, 27) 284 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 4.7)
Leflore County 6 Rural 2,073.1 (1,878.2, 2,282.9) 36 (4, 72) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-9.1, -0.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 1,981.3 (1,820.7, 2,152.5) 49 (13, 77) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 1,985.6 (1,859.0, 2,118.6) 48 (19, 73) 187 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Marion County 6 Rural 1,968.8 (1,787.0, 2,164.1) 50 (8, 79) 88 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 2,100.8 (1,946.7, 2,263.8) 29 (4, 66) 139 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 2,111.1 (1,842.7, 2,407.8) 27 (1, 79) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 1,813.0 (1,640.1, 1,999.1) 71 (28, 82) 83 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Newton County 6 Rural 1,938.8 (1,737.5, 2,157.0) 55 (8, 80) 69 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 1,884.9 (1,601.0, 2,204.4) 65 (4, 82) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.6)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 1,769.4 (1,617.6, 1,931.6) 76 (39, 82) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Panola County 6 Rural 2,104.5 (1,932.6, 2,287.7) 28 (3, 70) 114 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 2,172.1 (2,045.6, 2,304.3) 17 (3, 51) 228 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 2,140.8 (1,985.3, 2,305.3) 23 (3, 61) 145 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 2,201.1 (2,010.2, 2,405.4) 15 (1, 59) 100 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 1,898.0 (1,721.0, 2,088.4) 63 (18, 81) 85 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Quitman County 6 Rural 2,370.3 (1,974.5, 2,822.9) 3 (1, 75) 26 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.6)
Sharkey County 6 Rural 1,992.1 (1,548.1, 2,523.4) 47 (1, 82) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
Smith County 6 Rural 2,082.9 (1,851.8, 2,334.9) 33 (2, 76) 59 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.1, 12.4)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 2,026.9 (1,821.9, 2,248.9) 43 (5, 77) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-13.3, 1.5)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 2,163.5 (1,886.9, 2,469.2) 19 (1, 76) 45 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.4)
Tippah County 6 Rural 1,936.5 (1,739.7, 2,149.7) 56 (10, 80) 72 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.5)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 2,273.2 (2,064.1, 2,497.8) 8 (1, 56) 88 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Union County 6 Rural 2,148.9 (1,959.7, 2,351.5) 21 (1, 67) 97 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Walthall County 6 Rural 2,071.5 (1,834.4, 2,330.8) 37 (2, 78) 56 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.3)
Warren County 6 Rural 1,826.1 (1,689.8, 1,970.6) 70 (36, 81) 138 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Washington County 6 Rural 2,021.7 (1,874.5, 2,177.5) 44 (10, 73) 148 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 1,839.4 (1,638.4, 2,058.4) 68 (16, 82) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Webster County 6 Rural 1,934.8 (1,654.2, 2,249.3) 57 (2, 82) 34 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.8)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 2,077.2 (1,765.4, 2,429.1) 35 (1, 81) 33 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.8)
Winston County 6 Rural 1,959.6 (1,761.4, 2,174.1) 53 (10, 80) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 2,005.1 (1,764.5, 2,269.8) 46 (3, 80) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 1,551.1 (1,272.9, 1,872.6) 82 (41, 82) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Copiah County 6 Urban 1,916.1 (1,746.4, 2,097.9) 59 (16, 80) 97 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 1,962.3 (1,880.9, 2,046.3) 52 (28, 69) 457 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.8, -1.5)
Forrest County 6 Urban 2,198.7 (2,071.2, 2,331.9) 16 (3, 47) 226 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Hancock County 6 Urban 2,078.4 (1,945.6, 2,218.0) 34 (7, 64) 189 stable stable trend -6.4 (-15.0, 1.2)
Harrison County 6 Urban 2,236.0 (2,161.0, 2,312.9) 9 (4, 30) 695 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Hinds County 6 Urban 2,038.0 (1,968.5, 2,109.3) 42 (22, 58) 677 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Holmes County 6 Urban 2,311.1 (2,055.4, 2,589.9) 7 (1, 59) 61 stable stable trend 8.8 (-2.6, 17.1)
Jackson County 6 Urban 2,088.3 (2,003.1, 2,176.2) 32 (13, 54) 469 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 4.3)
Lamar County 6 Urban 2,069.9 (1,934.3, 2,212.4) 38 (8, 67) 179 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 2,220.8 (2,111.3, 2,334.5) 12 (3, 40) 327 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 5.1)
Marshall County 6 Urban 2,057.0 (1,895.2, 2,229.2) 39 (6, 70) 124 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 2,056.2 (1,789.0, 2,352.4) 40 (1, 80) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Rankin County 6 Urban 1,886.4 (1,808.6, 1,966.7) 64 (42, 75) 454 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.7, -0.5)
Scott County 6 Urban 1,956.7 (1,771.3, 2,156.5) 54 (11, 80) 84 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Simpson County 6 Urban 2,234.1 (2,041.7, 2,439.8) 10 (1, 55) 102 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.2)
Stone County 6 Urban 2,116.9 (1,877.6, 2,378.8) 25 (1, 77) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.5)
Tate County 6 Urban 2,097.7 (1,909.5, 2,299.7) 30 (3, 72) 95 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.2, 10.6)
Tunica County 6 Urban 2,165.4 (1,792.2, 2,594.7) 18 (1, 81) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 2,344.0 (2,120.3, 2,584.9) 5 (1, 46) 82 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 6:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top