Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 104.6 (102.5, 106.8) N/A 1,822 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 158.5 (120.6, 204.4) 1 (1, 57) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (0.0, 5.4)
Quitman County 6 Rural 153.9 (101.8, 222.7) 2 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.8, 5.4)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 148.7 (108.6, 198.5) 3 (1, 70) 9 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.3, 15.8)
Walthall County 6 Rural 143.6 (108.7, 186.1) 4 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.1, 8.2)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 140.6 (99.6, 192.2) 5 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.6, 7.3)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 140.2 (110.1, 175.9) 6 (1, 58) 15 stable stable trend -3.0 (-10.5, 0.2)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 136.4 (91.6, 194.9) 7 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.0, 5.4)
Grenada County 6 Rural 134.8 (107.1, 167.4) 8 (1, 63) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.1)
Benton County 6 Urban 132.9 (88.8, 190.9) 10 (1, 80) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural 130.3 (94.5, 174.8) 9 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.3)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 130.0 (112.5, 149.3) 11 (2, 44) 40 stable stable trend 3.0 (-6.1, 9.7)
Smith County 6 Rural 125.5 (92.7, 165.8) 12 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.7, 8.6)
Amite County 6 Rural 123.8 (87.8, 169.2) 13 (1, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.3)
Jasper County 6 Rural 123.6 (93.0, 160.8) 14 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 2.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 121.4 (100.5, 145.4) 15 (2, 69) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 3.8)
Carroll County 6 Rural 119.2 (81.9, 167.8) 16 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 4.9)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 118.9 (91.9, 150.8) 17 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -4.4 (-27.4, 0.0)
Union County 6 Rural 118.3 (96.0, 144.0) 18 (2, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 118.0 (84.8, 159.7) 19 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.0)
Perry County 6 Urban 116.8 (83.3, 159.2) 20 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
Leflore County 6 Rural 116.6 (93.7, 143.2) 21 (3, 76) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.3)
Hancock County 6 Urban 115.6 (97.7, 135.8) 23 (4, 68) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.2)
Hinds County 6 Urban 115.0 (107.0, 123.5) 22 (10, 48) 153 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Madison County 6 Urban 114.8 (103.7, 126.8) 24 (8, 55) 78 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 113.4 (89.7, 141.3) 26 (3, 77) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
Warren County 6 Rural 113.4 (95.8, 133.2) 25 (4, 70) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.4)
Wayne County 6 Rural 112.8 (86.4, 144.5) 28 (2, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.4, 3.4)
Tippah County 6 Rural 112.5 (87.8, 141.8) 29 (3, 78) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.1)
Jones County 6 Rural 112.4 (97.7, 128.5) 27 (8, 66) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.2)
Newton County 6 Rural 111.3 (86.4, 141.0) 31 (3, 78) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 4.5)
Copiah County 6 Urban 109.5 (87.3, 135.5) 30 (3, 76) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 109.3 (78.6, 147.8) 32 (2, 80) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Leake County 6 Rural 108.8 (84.9, 137.3) 33 (4, 78) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.6)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 108.8 (88.3, 132.6) 34 (6, 76) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.5)
Lee County 6 Rural 108.1 (95.7, 121.8) 35 (12, 67) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Marion County 6 Rural 107.9 (85.1, 134.8) 37 (4, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 107.1 (99.0, 115.7) 36 (17, 58) 129 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Forrest County 6 Urban 106.5 (92.9, 121.5) 38 (11, 70) 45 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 105.4 (92.0, 120.2) 39 (11, 72) 45 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Holmes County 6 Urban 105.2 (77.1, 139.6) 40 (3, 80) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.7)
Simpson County 6 Urban 103.6 (81.7, 129.5) 41 (6, 79) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.3)
Jackson County 6 Urban 102.6 (93.3, 112.6) 42 (19, 67) 90 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 102.5 (63.3, 156.4) 44 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Tunica County 6 Urban 101.9 (69.6, 143.8) 46 (2, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.8, 6.1)
Kemper County 6 Rural 101.8 (65.0, 151.4) 47 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.0)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 101.6 (81.0, 125.7) 43 (7, 79) 17 stable stable trend -7.0 (-25.0, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 101.5 (83.3, 122.4) 45 (9, 78) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.7)
Webster County 6 Rural 100.7 (66.2, 146.2) 49 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.4)
Clarke County 6 Rural 100.6 (72.3, 136.1) 50 (3, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 2.9)
Covington County 6 Rural 100.3 (75.0, 131.2) 51 (5, 80) 11 stable stable trend -16.5 (-32.0, 1.1)
Pike County 6 Rural 100.1 (82.6, 120.3) 48 (11, 79) 23 stable stable trend 14.3 (-0.1, 25.3)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 98.1 (60.7, 148.7) 54 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.1, 7.9)
Washington County 6 Rural 98.0 (81.1, 117.1) 55 (13, 79) 24 falling falling trend -3.1 (-8.5, -0.5)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 97.8 (82.6, 114.9) 57 (15, 78) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.8)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 97.7 (79.6, 118.7) 58 (11, 79) 20 stable stable trend -17.9 (-33.8, 0.2)
Rankin County 6 Urban 97.6 (89.2, 106.6) 53 (25, 72) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 97.3 (82.9, 113.5) 56 (17, 78) 33 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 96.9 (62.6, 142.9) 52 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.3, 7.0)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 96.4 (59.5, 147.2) 59 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.8, 9.7)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 94.6 (75.4, 117.0) 61 (12, 80) 17 stable stable trend -18.7 (-36.5, 0.0)
Lamar County 6 Urban 94.1 (81.2, 108.4) 60 (23, 78) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Panola County 6 Rural 93.5 (74.7, 115.3) 62 (13, 80) 17 falling falling trend -13.2 (-28.7, -1.1)
Scott County 6 Urban 93.0 (73.2, 116.4) 63 (12, 80) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-10.8, -1.2)
Winston County 6 Rural 92.8 (67.9, 123.7) 64 (8, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.4)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 91.9 (73.1, 114.1) 65 (15, 80) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.4)
Stone County 6 Urban 91.7 (67.7, 121.4) 67 (9, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.8)
Harrison County 6 Urban 91.6 (84.2, 99.6) 66 (39, 76) 112 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Clay County 6 Rural 91.5 (67.3, 121.3) 68 (9, 80) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 90.9 (65.6, 122.3) 69 (8, 80) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 2.8)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 88.8 (55.4, 134.6) 70 (3, 80) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 87.0 (51.4, 137.2) 73 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.0, 3.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 86.9 (68.1, 109.3) 71 (15, 80) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 2.8)
Marshall County 6 Urban 86.6 (68.8, 107.4) 74 (21, 80) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 3.9)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 86.4 (67.2, 109.2) 72 (18, 80) 14 stable stable trend -2.1 (-12.0, 1.1)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 85.2 (68.5, 104.4) 76 (24, 80) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-22.8, 5.8)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 84.5 (64.3, 109.0) 77 (20, 80) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.0)
George County 6 Rural 83.7 (64.0, 107.4) 75 (17, 80) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
Greene County 6 Rural 81.9 (58.0, 112.5) 78 (13, 80) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.4)
Tate County 6 Urban 80.1 (61.6, 102.3) 79 (29, 80) 13 falling falling trend -16.0 (-32.1, -6.2)
Attala County 6 Rural 76.8 (54.3, 105.4) 80 (17, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 1.9)
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 6:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Issaquena, Sharkey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top