Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 482.2 (476.2, 488.2) N/A 5,488 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 447.9 (447.0, 448.8) N/A 191,594 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.1)
Benton County 6 Urban 398.2 (302.9, 515.0) 80 (7, 82) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.9)
Copiah County 6 Urban 443.4 (396.4, 494.4) 68 (22, 80) 71 falling falling trend -3.9 (-13.0, -1.5)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 438.8 (406.9, 472.5) 69 (35, 80) 187 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.9)
Forrest County 6 Urban 541.8 (498.7, 587.5) 11 (3, 50) 128 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Hancock County 6 Urban 482.6 (387.1, 594.6) 42 (2, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.5)
Harrison County 6 Urban 455.5 (427.0, 485.3) 64 (31, 77) 213 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Hinds County 6 Urban 493.9 (478.4, 509.7) 33 (20, 54) 841 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Holmes County 6 Urban 531.6 (479.9, 587.4) 14 (3, 62) 82 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Jackson County 6 Urban 462.7 (428.3, 499.2) 59 (22, 77) 153 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Lamar County 6 Urban 436.7 (370.9, 510.1) 73 (11, 82) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.9)
Madison County 6 Urban 486.3 (453.2, 521.2) 39 (14, 71) 182 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Marshall County 6 Urban 478.1 (433.3, 526.3) 47 (10, 77) 91 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 636.6 (508.0, 789.7) 3 (1, 69) 18 rising rising trend 8.1 (1.1, 28.3)
Rankin County 6 Urban 458.1 (421.2, 497.1) 63 (23, 78) 131 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Scott County 6 Urban 463.0 (406.3, 525.4) 58 (10, 80) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Simpson County 6 Urban 497.7 (436.0, 565.9) 31 (5, 77) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.8)
Stone County 6 Urban 416.0 (314.6, 538.6) 78 (6, 82) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 2.3)
Tate County 6 Urban 478.0 (411.5, 552.1) 48 (5, 80) 42 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.9)
Tunica County 6 Urban 556.1 (473.5, 648.5) 9 (1, 72) 37 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.7)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 561.3 (504.6, 622.4) 7 (2, 53) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Adams County 6 Rural 438.6 (396.7, 484.0) 70 (27, 81) 91 falling falling trend -2.3 (-13.8, -0.3)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 438.0 (353.0, 537.3) 71 (6, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.2)
Amite County 6 Rural 515.0 (438.4, 602.2) 22 (2, 78) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Attala County 6 Rural 482.8 (418.4, 554.5) 41 (5, 80) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 487.3 (444.9, 532.7) 38 (10, 74) 110 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.8, 0.4)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 517.8 (421.9, 629.5) 21 (2, 80) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.6)
Carroll County 6 Rural 437.0 (351.3, 538.9) 72 (7, 82) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.6)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 511.7 (442.2, 589.2) 25 (3, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.3)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 407.4 (311.0, 526.4) 79 (7, 82) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.8)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 443.9 (378.5, 517.4) 67 (10, 82) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Clarke County 6 Rural 453.1 (380.6, 535.9) 65 (6, 82) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Clay County 6 Rural 504.1 (447.0, 566.4) 27 (5, 75) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 540.2 (489.9, 594.2) 12 (3, 56) 93 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.1)
Covington County 6 Rural 555.0 (476.4, 643.0) 10 (1, 71) 38 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.7)
Franklin County 6 Rural 507.4 (395.5, 641.9) 26 (1, 82) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.1)
George County 6 Rural 316.6 (215.6, 450.2) 82 (26, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.5, 4.5)
Greene County 6 Rural 369.0 (271.2, 489.9) 81 (10, 82) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.6)
Grenada County 6 Rural 529.2 (465.7, 599.0) 15 (2, 72) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 601.7 (518.9, 694.3) 4 (1, 51) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.6, 1.7)
Issaquena County 6 Rural 814.7 (525.4, 1,214.2) 1 (1, 80) 6 rising rising trend 36.4 (3.2, 74.7)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 597.9 (431.8, 805.9) 5 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.6)
Jasper County 6 Rural 477.2 (418.8, 541.9) 49 (7, 80) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 497.0 (426.2, 576.6) 32 (3, 79) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.6)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 512.0 (445.2, 586.7) 24 (3, 77) 46 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.5)
Jones County 6 Rural 476.0 (431.8, 523.4) 51 (12, 77) 93 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Kemper County 6 Rural 428.8 (357.5, 510.6) 75 (12, 82) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 465.3 (407.3, 529.0) 57 (9, 80) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 429.7 (398.0, 463.3) 74 (41, 80) 145 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 528.3 (433.2, 638.6) 16 (1, 80) 24 stable stable trend 12.1 (-3.3, 25.2)
Leake County 6 Rural 450.5 (388.6, 519.5) 66 (12, 81) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Lee County 6 Rural 518.1 (472.7, 566.7) 20 (5, 64) 109 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Leflore County 6 Rural 519.1 (474.5, 566.8) 19 (5, 64) 108 stable stable trend -1.0 (-10.2, 0.8)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 476.1 (417.5, 540.6) 50 (7, 79) 55 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 479.0 (441.4, 518.9) 46 (14, 74) 133 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 502.8 (437.0, 575.9) 29 (4, 78) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Monroe County 6 Rural 492.7 (437.4, 553.4) 34 (7, 77) 63 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 480.9 (401.0, 572.9) 43 (3, 81) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.8)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 417.2 (346.0, 498.5) 76 (15, 82) 26 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Newton County 6 Rural 461.6 (391.2, 541.1) 61 (6, 81) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 491.2 (423.3, 567.1) 36 (4, 79) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.6, 0.5)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 470.4 (423.0, 521.6) 53 (11, 78) 78 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Panola County 6 Rural 479.1 (429.9, 532.2) 45 (9, 78) 77 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 501.8 (429.2, 583.3) 30 (3, 79) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7)
Pike County 6 Rural 488.3 (446.4, 533.1) 37 (10, 73) 109 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 557.8 (465.5, 663.2) 8 (1, 74) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.7)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 462.1 (363.2, 579.6) 60 (3, 82) 16 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.7, -1.0)
Quitman County 6 Rural 638.2 (539.6, 749.8) 2 (1, 48) 32 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.9)
Sharkey County 6 Rural 524.6 (415.1, 655.1) 18 (1, 81) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-6.0, -0.3)
Smith County 6 Rural 581.2 (470.2, 710.6) 6 (1, 77) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.2)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 514.8 (468.3, 564.6) 23 (5, 68) 99 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.3)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 538.5 (465.5, 619.7) 13 (2, 73) 41 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.7, 3.9)
Tippah County 6 Rural 479.6 (384.7, 591.3) 44 (2, 82) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.9)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 503.4 (306.0, 805.0) 28 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.4, 6.8)
Union County 6 Rural 459.1 (370.2, 562.8) 62 (4, 82) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.7)
Walthall County 6 Rural 473.0 (401.6, 553.8) 52 (5, 81) 33 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.2)
Warren County 6 Rural 469.5 (428.0, 513.8) 54 (14, 77) 105 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 486.0 (453.2, 520.6) 40 (15, 71) 181 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.8, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 416.5 (355.7, 485.0) 77 (19, 82) 36 falling falling trend -13.8 (-23.0, -3.8)
Webster County 6 Rural 467.8 (345.2, 622.0) 55 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.8, 2.9)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 467.6 (397.3, 547.3) 56 (5, 81) 34 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Winston County 6 Rural 492.5 (429.5, 562.3) 35 (5, 78) 48 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 7.6)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 525.2 (441.7, 620.4) 17 (2, 78) 32 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 12:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top