Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 12.9 (12.4, 13.5) N/A 472 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Adams County 6 Rural 12.6 (8.2, 18.8) 32 (3, 47) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.1, 7.8)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 20.1 (14.5, 27.3) 2 (1, 33) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.7)
Amite County 6 Rural 15.9 (8.8, 27.5) 10 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Attala County 6 Rural 17.8 (10.9, 27.6) 5 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Bolivar County 6 Rural 14.5 (9.4, 21.4) 19 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.3, 8.0)
Clay County 6 Rural 17.5 (10.7, 27.3) 6 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Coahoma County 6 Rural 15.9 (9.9, 24.4) 12 (1, 47) 5 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.0, 11.1)
Copiah County 6 Urban 10.9 (6.7, 17.1) 42 (5, 47) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.9, 1.0)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 11.8 (9.7, 14.2) 36 (14, 46) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.5)
Forrest County 6 Urban 15.9 (12.2, 20.4) 11 (1, 40) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.6)
Grenada County 6 Rural 14.4 (8.8, 22.6) 20 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Hancock County 6 Urban 15.5 (11.5, 20.6) 14 (1, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.4)
Harrison County 6 Urban 13.4 (11.4, 15.6) 26 (9, 41) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Hinds County 6 Urban 12.0 (10.1, 14.1) 35 (16, 45) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 14.1 (8.8, 21.8) 22 (1, 47) 4 rising rising trend 22.9 (0.2, 43.8)
Jackson County 6 Urban 13.6 (11.3, 16.3) 25 (7, 42) 25 stable stable trend 5.4 (-4.6, 23.6)
Jones County 6 Rural 10.4 (7.5, 14.1) 43 (13, 47) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.0, 2.4)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 9.6 (6.2, 14.4) 47 (12, 47) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 6.8)
Lamar County 6 Urban 11.5 (8.2, 15.7) 37 (8, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.8)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 10.0 (7.2, 13.5) 45 (17, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.0)
Leake County 6 Rural 16.0 (9.7, 24.9) 9 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural 14.8 (11.6, 18.8) 17 (3, 42) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.1)
Leflore County 6 Rural 11.4 (6.8, 18.1) 38 (3, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 5.9)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 15.1 (10.3, 21.5) 15 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 5.4)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 13.3 (9.5, 18.0) 27 (4, 46) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.7, 7.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 12.0 (9.4, 15.1) 34 (10, 46) 16 stable stable trend 6.1 (-1.4, 28.0)
Marion County 6 Rural 11.0 (6.5, 17.7) 40 (4, 47) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6 Urban 11.4 (7.5, 16.9) 39 (5, 47) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.4, 4.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.7, 22.0) 13 (1, 45) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.9, 8.5)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.2, 20.3) 28 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Newton County 6 Rural 12.8 (7.1, 21.2) 31 (1, 47) 3 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.5, 10.6)
Panola County 6 Rural 10.1 (6.2, 15.8) 44 (7, 47) 4
*
*
Pearl River County 6 Rural 16.1 (12.0, 21.3) 8 (1, 41) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 4.6)
Pike County 6 Rural 14.3 (9.8, 20.2) 21 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.3, 8.4)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 14.8 (9.7, 21.7) 18 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Prentiss County 6 Rural 9.8 (5.5, 16.3) 46 (6, 47) 3
*
*
Rankin County 6 Urban 13.2 (10.9, 15.8) 29 (9, 43) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.6)
Scott County 6 Urban 19.0 (12.9, 27.2) 4 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 5.5)
Simpson County 6 Urban 12.1 (7.5, 18.9) 33 (3, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.4, 7.3)
Smith County 6 Rural 17.1 (9.6, 28.5) 7 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Stone County 6 Urban 20.3 (12.3, 31.6) 1 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Tate County 6 Urban 11.0 (6.6, 17.3) 41 (5, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.2, 5.6)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 20.0 (13.1, 29.7) 3 (1, 43) 6
*
*
Union County 6 Rural 14.0 (8.7, 21.5) 24 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.6, 8.3)
Warren County 6 Rural 15.1 (10.7, 20.7) 16 (1, 45) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.9, 8.8)
Washington County 6 Rural 14.1 (9.9, 19.5) 23 (2, 46) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Wayne County 6 Rural 12.9 (7.2, 21.6) 30 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yazoo County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 6:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Benton, Calhoun, Carroll, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Claiborne, Clarke, Covington, Franklin, George, Greene, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jasper, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Kemper, Lawrence, Montgomery, Noxubee, Oktibbeha, Perry, Quitman, Sharkey, Sunflower, Tallahatchie, Tippah, Tunica, Walthall, Webster, Wilkinson, Winston, Yalobusha, Yazoo

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top