Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 46.4 (45.4, 47.4) N/A 1,651 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Winston County 6 Rural 33.5 (24.1, 45.8) 80 (32, 80) 9 falling falling trend -7.2 (-33.2, -3.0)
Jasper County 6 Rural 33.8 (23.6, 47.3) 79 (24, 80) 8 falling falling trend -10.8 (-29.2, -4.0)
Stone County 6 Urban 34.1 (23.7, 47.7) 78 (25, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.8, 2.6)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 34.2 (26.8, 43.0) 77 (41, 80) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.4)
Rankin County 6 Urban 34.6 (30.8, 38.7) 76 (58, 80) 63 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 35.0 (20.1, 56.9) 75 (7, 80) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.7, 4.0)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 36.3 (22.6, 56.4) 74 (11, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.7, 5.5)
Madison County 6 Urban 37.0 (32.2, 42.4) 73 (48, 80) 45 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Pike County 6 Rural 37.5 (30.1, 46.3) 72 (31, 80) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.4)
Forrest County 6 Urban 39.0 (33.1, 45.7) 71 (34, 80) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 39.1 (31.8, 47.6) 70 (28, 80) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.9)
Tate County 6 Urban 39.3 (30.1, 50.4) 69 (20, 80) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 39.7 (31.8, 49.1) 68 (25, 80) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Adams County 6 Rural 39.8 (31.3, 49.9) 67 (23, 80) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.6)
Jones County 6 Rural 39.9 (33.8, 46.7) 66 (31, 80) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Warren County 6 Rural 39.9 (32.6, 48.3) 65 (26, 80) 23 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 40.1 (32.1, 49.6) 64 (22, 80) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.4)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 40.9 (27.3, 59.1) 63 (8, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 41.0 (28.5, 57.7) 62 (9, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-20.4, 3.2)
Smith County 6 Rural 41.1 (29.1, 56.8) 61 (11, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.6)
Amite County 6 Rural 41.5 (28.7, 58.6) 60 (9, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.3)
Lamar County 6 Urban 41.5 (35.0, 49.0) 59 (26, 79) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 7.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 41.8 (33.9, 51.3) 58 (20, 79) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 42.9 (36.1, 50.7) 57 (21, 78) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Marion County 6 Rural 43.1 (33.3, 55.1) 56 (13, 80) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 43.5 (26.6, 67.7) 55 (2, 80) 4
*
*
Pearl River County 6 Rural 44.1 (37.2, 52.0) 54 (19, 76) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Jackson County 6 Urban 44.5 (40.0, 49.3) 53 (28, 70) 76 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 44.7 (40.5, 49.2) 52 (29, 69) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 44.9 (34.9, 57.0) 51 (11, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.6)
Perry County 6 Urban 45.2 (30.5, 65.0) 50 (3, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 1.7)
Union County 6 Rural 46.3 (36.3, 58.3) 49 (9, 79) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.3)
Hancock County 6 Urban 46.3 (38.8, 55.1) 48 (15, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.2)
George County 6 Rural 46.6 (35.8, 59.9) 47 (7, 79) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 5.8)
Simpson County 6 Urban 46.7 (36.5, 59.0) 46 (9, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.4)
Hinds County 6 Urban 48.3 (44.4, 52.4) 45 (22, 60) 122 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 48.7 (31.8, 72.5) 44 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.4, 8.1)
Carroll County 6 Rural 48.8 (33.9, 69.2) 43 (2, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.2, 7.9)
Harrison County 6 Urban 48.9 (44.9, 53.1) 42 (20, 58) 117 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 5.1)
Lee County 6 Rural 48.9 (42.8, 55.7) 41 (14, 65) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 48.9 (33.7, 69.5) 40 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.6)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 48.9 (42.6, 56.0) 39 (14, 67) 46 stable stable trend -3.6 (-11.1, 2.7)
Grenada County 6 Rural 49.1 (37.6, 63.0) 38 (5, 79) 14 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.0, 0.0)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 49.2 (39.3, 60.8) 37 (8, 76) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.5)
Marshall County 6 Urban 49.3 (40.1, 60.0) 36 (8, 75) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Tippah County 6 Rural 49.3 (37.9, 63.2) 35 (6, 78) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.0)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 49.8 (38.9, 63.0) 34 (5, 77) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.3)
Copiah County 6 Urban 50.2 (40.3, 62.0) 33 (6, 74) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.1)
Newton County 6 Rural 50.4 (38.5, 64.8) 32 (4, 78) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.3, 6.9)
Noxubee County 6 Rural 50.6 (34.7, 71.7) 31 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 5.1)
Wilkinson County 6 Rural 50.6 (33.5, 74.2) 30 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 2.8)
Washington County 6 Rural 51.2 (42.8, 60.8) 29 (7, 70) 29 falling falling trend -6.2 (-20.0, -2.2)
Scott County 6 Urban 51.6 (40.9, 64.4) 28 (5, 74) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 0.9)
Clay County 6 Rural 51.9 (39.5, 67.3) 27 (3, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.7)
Panola County 6 Rural 54.0 (44.2, 65.5) 26 (5, 67) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.4, 13.6)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 54.3 (42.3, 69.0) 25 (2, 72) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Walthall County 6 Rural 54.6 (40.6, 72.3) 24 (2, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.1, 6.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 55.0 (42.3, 70.5) 23 (2, 73) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.3)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 55.0 (43.3, 69.0) 22 (2, 74) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Clarke County 6 Rural 55.2 (40.9, 73.1) 21 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.3)
Yalobusha County 6 Rural 57.2 (41.7, 77.1) 20 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.6)
Tunica County 6 Urban 57.2 (37.2, 84.0) 19 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.8)
Kemper County 6 Rural 57.3 (39.6, 81.1) 18 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 3.2)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 58.0 (46.3, 71.8) 17 (2, 65) 18 falling falling trend -17.6 (-30.3, -0.8)
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural 59.0 (42.5, 80.4) 16 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.2, 5.7)
Covington County 6 Rural 59.2 (45.6, 75.8) 15 (1, 68) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.3)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 59.9 (46.8, 75.8) 14 (1, 65) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 3.8)
Attala County 6 Rural 61.2 (47.4, 77.9) 13 (1, 66) 15 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.4, 12.3)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 62.2 (51.2, 75.0) 12 (1, 49) 24 stable stable trend -2.3 (-21.0, 2.2)
Neshoba County 6 Rural 62.3 (50.8, 75.8) 11 (1, 54) 21 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 4.0)
Leflore County 6 Rural 62.9 (51.0, 76.8) 10 (1, 54) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.0)
Leake County 6 Rural 63.1 (49.8, 78.9) 9 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.9)
Webster County 6 Rural 64.3 (46.0, 88.1) 8 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend 17.7 (-0.6, 43.7)
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural 65.1 (47.7, 86.9) 7 (1, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 4.9)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 65.7 (43.7, 95.4) 6 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.3)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 66.4 (50.0, 86.8) 5 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.3, 5.2)
Holmes County 6 Urban 68.8 (52.9, 88.2) 4 (1, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-14.3, 11.0)
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 71.2 (55.7, 89.9) 3 (1, 44) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.5)
Quitman County 6 Rural 77.0 (52.1, 110.6) 2 (1, 69) 6
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural 84.2 (59.6, 116.1) 1 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 6.7)
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/11/2024 1:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Issaquena, Sharkey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top