Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 8.8 (8.4, 9.2) N/A 340 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.1, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.5, 7.9) 38 (23, 38) 5 falling falling trend -35.6 (-56.0, -9.3)
Washington County 6 Rural 5.5 (3.1, 9.2) 37 (16, 38) 3 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.6)
Lamar County 6 Urban 5.5 (3.3, 8.8) 36 (19, 38) 4
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) 35 (18, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 3.5)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 6.1 (3.5, 10.0) 34 (13, 38) 3
*
*
Rankin County 6 Urban 6.7 (5.2, 8.6) 33 (20, 38) 13 falling falling trend -8.2 (-27.1, -0.8)
Warren County 6 Rural 6.8 (4.3, 10.5) 32 (11, 38) 5 falling falling trend -23.6 (-48.0, -8.9)
Panola County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.3, 12.4) 31 (6, 38) 3
*
*
DeSoto County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.0, 9.5) 30 (15, 37) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.0, 6.4)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 7.6 (5.1, 11.1) 29 (9, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.5, 6.6)
Marshall County 6 Urban 8.0 (4.7, 12.9) 28 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural 8.1 (5.8, 11.0) 27 (9, 37) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 8.4 (5.3, 13.0) 26 (4, 38) 5
*
*
Tate County 6 Urban 8.7 (5.0, 14.4) 25 (2, 38) 3
*
*
Hancock County 6 Urban 9.0 (6.1, 13.2) 24 (4, 37) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.2)
Forrest County 6 Urban 9.1 (6.4, 12.6) 23 (5, 37) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.9)
Hinds County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.6, 10.9) 22 (10, 32) 27 stable stable trend -12.0 (-35.2, 2.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 9.6 (7.2, 12.5) 21 (5, 34) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.7, 8.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 9.6 (6.0, 14.9) 20 (1, 38) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.2)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 10.3 (6.1, 16.3) 19 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Scott County 6 Urban 10.3 (5.9, 16.8) 18 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Yazoo County 6 Urban 10.6 (6.0, 17.4) 17 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Tippah County 6 Rural 10.6 (6.0, 17.6) 16 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.3, 18.2) 15 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Grenada County 6 Rural 11.4 (6.7, 18.7) 14 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Alcorn County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.8, 16.8) 13 (1, 34) 6
*
*
Simpson County 6 Urban 11.6 (7.1, 18.2) 12 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Pearl River County 6 Rural 11.6 (8.5, 15.6) 11 (1, 31) 10 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.3, 9.2)
Adams County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.4, 17.7) 10 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Jackson County 6 Urban 12.0 (9.9, 14.6) 9 (2, 23) 23 rising rising trend 15.5 (7.5, 27.9)
Newton County 6 Rural 12.3 (6.9, 20.4) 8 (1, 38) 3
*
*
George County 6 Rural 12.5 (7.4, 19.9) 7 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Prentiss County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.4, 20.2) 6 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Harrison County 6 Urban 13.1 (11.2, 15.3) 5 (1, 17) 35 stable stable trend -5.2 (-13.8, 1.3)
Marion County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.3, 20.2) 4 (1, 33) 5 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.3, 11.5)
Clay County 6 Rural 13.3 (7.8, 21.8) 3 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Neshoba County 6 Rural 13.5 (8.5, 20.6) 2 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 6.2)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 14.0 (8.9, 21.5) 1 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Amite County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bolivar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coahoma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Copiah County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leflore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 6:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Amite, Attala, Benton, Bolivar, Calhoun, Carroll, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Claiborne, Clarke, Coahoma, Copiah, Covington, Franklin, Greene, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jasper, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Kemper, Lawrence, Leake, Leflore, Monroe, Montgomery, Noxubee, Oktibbeha, Perry, Quitman, Sharkey, Smith, Stone, Sunflower, Tallahatchie, Tunica, Union, Walthall, Wayne, Webster, Wilkinson, Winston, Yalobusha

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top