Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 16.2 (15.6, 16.8) N/A 568 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Marshall County 6 Urban 9.7 (6.1, 14.9) 57 (26, 57) 5 falling falling trend -20.1 (-51.6, -2.1)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.5, 17.4) 56 (12, 57) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.9, 10.8)
George County 6 Rural 11.5 (6.3, 19.2) 55 (8, 57) 3
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural 12.3 (8.3, 17.5) 54 (13, 57) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 1.8)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 12.5 (8.5, 17.8) 53 (12, 57) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.7)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.5, 15.2) 52 (27, 56) 24 falling falling trend -7.2 (-21.6, -1.6)
Panola County 6 Rural 12.8 (8.2, 19.0) 51 (8, 57) 5 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.9, 0.2)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 13.1 (7.8, 20.7) 50 (5, 57) 4
*
*
Neshoba County 6 Rural 13.3 (8.4, 20.0) 49 (7, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.6, 4.9)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 13.5 (10.3, 17.5) 48 (14, 57) 13 stable stable trend -3.2 (-27.6, 3.2)
Grenada County 6 Rural 13.5 (7.7, 22.1) 47 (3, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.4, 6.0)
Clay County 6 Rural 13.8 (7.7, 23.0) 46 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Scott County 6 Urban 14.1 (8.8, 21.5) 45 (4, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.2, 3.8)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 14.1 (9.1, 21.0) 44 (4, 57) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.6, -0.9)
Clarke County 6 Rural 14.6 (8.3, 24.5) 43 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Chickasaw County 6 Rural 14.7 (8.5, 24.1) 42 (2, 57) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 7.4)
Jones County 6 Rural 14.9 (11.3, 19.3) 41 (8, 56) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.3)
Covington County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.7, 24.7) 40 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Copiah County 6 Urban 15.2 (9.6, 23.0) 39 (2, 57) 5 stable stable trend -9.1 (-47.0, 0.1)
Hinds County 6 Urban 15.2 (13.1, 17.6) 38 (16, 50) 39 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Hancock County 6 Urban 15.4 (11.3, 20.8) 37 (6, 55) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.9)
Jasper County 6 Rural 15.5 (8.9, 25.6) 36 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 8.1 (-0.6, 39.2)
Tishomingo County 6 Rural 15.8 (9.5, 25.2) 35 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Rural 16.1 (12.0, 21.1) 34 (5, 55) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.1, 2.8)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 16.1 (10.9, 22.7) 33 (2, 57) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.2, 4.1)
Wayne County 6 Rural 16.1 (9.6, 25.7) 32 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Alcorn County 6 Rural 16.1 (11.3, 22.5) 31 (3, 57) 8 stable stable trend -3.0 (-25.2, 4.9)
Leake County 6 Rural 16.4 (9.9, 25.6) 30 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural 16.6 (11.9, 22.6) 29 (3, 55) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.4, 10.2)
Monroe County 6 Rural 16.9 (12.0, 23.2) 28 (2, 55) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.1)
Smith County 6 Rural 16.9 (9.2, 28.6) 27 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Forrest County 6 Urban 16.9 (13.0, 21.6) 26 (4, 53) 13 stable stable trend 6.0 (-6.3, 21.5)
Sunflower County 6 Rural 16.9 (10.7, 25.4) 25 (1, 57) 5 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.3, 7.5)
Jackson County 6 Urban 17.1 (14.3, 20.2) 24 (7, 47) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Pearl River County 6 Rural 17.3 (13.2, 22.5) 23 (3, 53) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.2)
Newton County 6 Rural 17.4 (10.7, 26.7) 22 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.9, 5.8)
Stone County 6 Urban 17.7 (10.3, 28.3) 21 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Leflore County 6 Rural 17.8 (11.3, 26.6) 20 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.7, 9.7)
Madison County 6 Urban 17.8 (14.5, 21.7) 19 (4, 48) 21 falling falling trend -4.9 (-16.1, -0.7)
Marion County 6 Rural 17.9 (11.4, 26.8) 18 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 4.2)
Lamar County 6 Urban 17.9 (13.6, 23.2) 17 (2, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.6)
Attala County 6 Rural 18.0 (11.2, 27.8) 16 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 8.7)
Rankin County 6 Urban 18.2 (15.5, 21.3) 15 (5, 41) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.7)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 18.2 (11.1, 28.3) 14 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Simpson County 6 Urban 18.6 (12.4, 27.1) 13 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend -4.6 (-47.9, 5.2)
Union County 6 Rural 18.7 (12.4, 27.1) 12 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.8)
Prentiss County 6 Rural 18.9 (12.7, 27.3) 11 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 4.9)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 19.0 (13.4, 26.2) 10 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 4.8)
Harrison County 6 Urban 20.8 (18.2, 23.6) 9 (2, 27) 49 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.3)
Adams County 6 Rural 20.9 (14.6, 29.1) 8 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 4.5)
Pike County 6 Rural 21.0 (15.5, 27.9) 7 (1, 49) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.5)
Perry County 6 Urban 21.3 (12.0, 35.5) 6 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-6.3, 9.3)
Walthall County 6 Rural 21.3 (12.5, 34.4) 5 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.2, 5.9)
Itawamba County 6 Rural 21.6 (14.8, 30.8) 4 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.2, 6.2)
Tippah County 6 Rural 23.5 (15.7, 33.9) 3 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.5)
Lee County 6 Rural 23.8 (19.6, 28.7) 2 (1, 24) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.1)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 25.1 (15.0, 40.5) 1 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Amite County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tate County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Amite, Benton, Calhoun, Carroll, Choctaw, Claiborne, Franklin, Greene, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Kemper, Lawrence, Noxubee, Quitman, Sharkey, Tallahatchie, Tate, Tunica, Webster, Wilkinson, Winston, Yalobusha

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top