Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 N/A 25.4 (24.4, 26.5) N/A 470 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) N/A 57,211 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 3.7)
Grenada County 6 Rural 51.2 (35.4, 72.0) 1 (1, 18) 7
*
*
Itawamba County 6 Rural 43.6 (29.0, 63.1) 2 (1, 30) 6
*
*
Hinds County 6 Urban 40.5 (35.9, 45.7) 3 (1, 10) 59 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.5)
Pike County 6 Rural 38.3 (27.6, 51.8) 4 (1, 28) 9
*
*
Attala County 6 Rural 37.3 (21.7, 59.7) 5 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.6, 9.1)
Marshall County 6 Urban 34.3 (24.0, 48.0) 6 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.1, 8.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 33.9 (27.6, 41.2) 7 (2, 24) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.4)
Alcorn County 6 Rural 33.7 (23.3, 47.4) 8 (1, 36) 8 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.1, 8.9)
Holmes County 6 Urban 32.6 (18.5, 53.4) 9 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.9, 8.3)
Scott County 6 Urban 32.1 (20.4, 48.1) 10 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Rankin County 6 Urban 31.7 (26.8, 37.3) 11 (4, 24) 31 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.8, 10.0)
Yazoo County 6 Urban 29.3 (17.5, 46.2) 12 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.6, 8.8)
Hancock County 6 Urban 28.7 (20.6, 39.1) 13 (3, 39) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.2)
Forrest County 6 Urban 28.5 (21.6, 36.9) 14 (4, 38) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 3.0)
Stone County 6 Urban 28.2 (15.4, 47.7) 15 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Smith County 6 Rural 27.4 (15.5, 46.4) 16 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Copiah County 6 Urban 26.6 (16.7, 40.3) 17 (2, 42) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.4, 1.6)
Marion County 6 Rural 26.5 (16.1, 41.5) 18 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural 26.3 (20.1, 33.8) 19 (5, 39) 13 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.3, 10.6)
Warren County 6 Rural 25.8 (18.0, 36.1) 20 (4, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.0)
Union County 6 Rural 25.7 (15.6, 39.9) 21 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 25.4 (16.7, 37.2) 22 (3, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.5, 8.5)
Jones County 6 Rural 25.2 (18.6, 33.3) 23 (6, 40) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 6.8)
Coahoma County 6 Rural 25.1 (14.2, 41.3) 24 (2, 42) 3
*
*
Adams County 6 Rural 24.2 (15.0, 37.3) 25 (3, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.1, 5.7)
Simpson County 6 Urban 23.9 (14.2, 38.0) 26 (3, 42) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.0, 8.9)
DeSoto County 6 Urban 23.7 (19.7, 28.3) 27 (12, 39) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.7)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 23.4 (15.9, 33.3) 28 (5, 42) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 4.4)
Jackson County 6 Urban 22.7 (18.4, 27.7) 29 (13, 40) 21 stable stable trend 13.8 (-6.4, 33.9)
Harrison County 6 Urban 22.2 (18.6, 26.4) 30 (15, 40) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.4)
Oktibbeha County 6 Rural 22.2 (14.2, 33.1) 31 (5, 42) 5
*
*
Prentiss County 6 Rural 22.2 (12.4, 36.8) 32 (4, 42) 3
*
*
Lamar County 6 Urban 21.1 (15.0, 29.0) 33 (10, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.0, 5.5)
Lowndes County 6 Rural 20.9 (14.3, 29.4) 34 (10, 42) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.4, 19.0)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 20.6 (11.9, 33.2) 35 (6, 42) 4
*
*
Tate County 6 Urban 19.7 (11.1, 32.5) 36 (7, 42) 3
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 19.0 (11.6, 29.7) 37 (10, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.3, 6.8)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 19.0 (13.8, 25.7) 38 (15, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 18.3 (11.8, 27.3) 39 (13, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.0, 6.1)
Bolivar County 6 Rural 18.2 (10.0, 30.2) 40 (8, 42) 3
*
*
Pearl River County 6 Rural 17.9 (12.2, 25.5) 41 (16, 42) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.6)
Panola County 6 Rural 16.7 (9.7, 27.0) 42 (12, 42) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.4, 2.1)
Amite County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leflore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Neshoba County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/14/2025 2:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Amite, Benton, Calhoun, Carroll, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Claiborne, Clarke, Clay, Covington, Franklin, George, Greene, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jasper, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Kemper, Lawrence, Leake, Leflore, Montgomery, Neshoba, Newton, Noxubee, Perry, Quitman, Sharkey, Sunflower, Tallahatchie, Tippah, Tishomingo, Tunica, Walthall, Wayne, Webster, Wilkinson, Winston, Yalobusha

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top