Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Mississippi 6,10 17.5 (16.8, 18.2) 550 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 20.3 (20.2, 20.3) 68,242 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Perry County 6,10 28.0 (16.8, 44.1) 4 stable stable trend 7.2 (-27.1, 57.7)
Lawrence County 6,10 26.1 (15.6, 41.4) 4 stable stable trend -9.6 (-63.7, 125.3)
Madison County 6,10 25.9 (21.5, 30.9) 26 stable stable trend -6.9 (-14.7, 1.7)
Pearl River County 6,10 25.4 (20.0, 31.9) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-22.6, 32.4)
Chickasaw County 6,10 25.4 (16.3, 37.8) 5 stable stable trend -23.2 (-51.6, 21.8)
Neshoba County 6,10 25.1 (17.8, 34.5) 8 stable stable trend -4.6 (-32.2, 34.0)
Clarke County 6,10 25.1 (16.3, 37.3) 5 stable stable trend -10.3 (-41.8, 38.4)
Alcorn County 6,10 25.0 (18.8, 32.6) 11 stable stable trend -9.7 (-36.2, 27.6)
Rankin County 6,10 25.0 (21.4, 28.9) 37 stable stable trend -5.1 (-29.7, 28.1)
Monroe County 6,10 24.8 (18.2, 32.9) 10 stable stable trend 5.9 (-12.4, 28.1)
Carroll County 6,10 24.7 (14.0, 41.0) 3
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6,10 24.3 (14.1, 39.2) 4 stable stable trend 19.0 (-8.8, 55.2)
Marion County 6,10 24.1 (16.8, 33.6) 7 stable stable trend -10.3 (-36.7, 27.0)
Lamar County 6,10 23.3 (17.9, 29.9) 13 stable stable trend 16.6 (-7.7, 47.4)
Jackson County 6,10 23.3 (19.9, 27.1) 34 stable stable trend -10.7 (-27.2, 9.5)
Forrest County 6,10 23.1 (18.4, 28.7) 17 stable stable trend -8.1 (-27.6, 16.6)
Lafayette County 6,10 22.4 (16.3, 29.9) 9 stable stable trend 18.2 (-18.8, 72.1)
Itawamba County 6,10 22.3 (14.9, 32.1) 6 stable stable trend 5.1 (-30.8, 59.4)
Jones County 6,10 22.0 (17.3, 27.6) 16 stable stable trend -7.3 (-30.9, 24.3)
Scott County 6,10 21.8 (14.8, 31.0) 6 stable stable trend -4.0 (-23.3, 20.1)
Tippah County 6,10 21.5 (14.1, 31.6) 5 stable stable trend 15.3 (-12.9, 52.7)
Prentiss County 6,10 21.5 (14.5, 30.7) 6 stable stable trend -11.0 (-28.9, 11.4)
Covington County 6,10 21.1 (13.5, 31.7) 5 stable stable trend 26.5 (-6.5, 71.2)
Lee County 6,10 20.5 (16.5, 25.2) 18 stable stable trend 8.5 (-24.3, 55.4)
Pike County 6,10 20.2 (14.7, 27.1) 9 stable stable trend 7.1 (-27.3, 57.8)
Lincoln County 6,10 19.6 (13.8, 27.1) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-21.4, 30.4)
Grenada County 6,10 19.5 (12.1, 29.8) 4 stable stable trend 6.1 (-52.6, 137.4)
Harrison County 6,10 19.2 (16.5, 22.2) 38 stable stable trend -11.8 (-29.2, 9.9)
Union County 6,10 19.2 (12.8, 27.8) 6 stable stable trend 14.5 (-22.8, 69.9)
Tishomingo County 6,10 19.1 (11.7, 29.6) 4 stable stable trend -14.4 (-61.2, 89.2)
Warren County 6,10 19.1 (14.1, 25.4) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-31.7, 40.2)
Copiah County 6,10 19.0 (12.8, 27.4) 6 stable stable trend 7.7 (-33.1, 73.6)
Stone County 6,10 19.0 (10.9, 30.8) 3
*
*
George County 6,10 19.0 (11.8, 29.0) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-32.5, 58.6)
Jasper County 6,10 18.3 (10.7, 29.5) 4 stable stable trend 4.1 (-21.0, 37.2)
Amite County 6,10 17.5 (9.7, 29.6) 3
*
*
Oktibbeha County 6,10 16.6 (11.3, 23.5) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-43.6, 83.6)
Hancock County 6,10 16.5 (11.8, 22.5) 9 stable stable trend -3.8 (-40.4, 55.3)
Winston County 6,10 16.4 (9.9, 25.9) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-42.6, 62.2)
Lauderdale County 6,10 16.2 (12.7, 20.5) 15 stable stable trend -3.2 (-21.0, 18.5)
Simpson County 6,10 15.4 (9.7, 23.2) 5 stable stable trend 10.4 (-29.7, 73.3)
Panola County 6,10 14.3 (9.3, 21.1) 5 stable stable trend 22.7 (-29.8, 114.3)
Newton County 6,10 14.0 (8.3, 22.4) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-52.0, 120.8)
Lowndes County 6,10 13.2 (9.4, 18.0) 8 stable stable trend 19.1 (-10.7, 58.9)
Yazoo County 6,10 11.5 (6.5, 18.7) 3
*
*
Washington County 6,10 11.2 (7.4, 16.3) 6 rising rising trend 55.1 (2.1, 135.8)
Pontotoc County 6,10 11.1 (6.5, 17.7) 4 stable stable trend -14.5 (-41.9, 25.9)
Tate County 6,10 10.9 (6.2, 17.8) 3
*
*
DeSoto County 6,10 10.8 (8.6, 13.4) 17 stable stable trend 11.5 (-24.0, 63.5)
Hinds County 6,10 10.5 (8.7, 12.6) 24 stable stable trend -13.2 (-31.9, 10.5)
Bolivar County 6,10 10.1 (5.8, 16.2) 3
*
*
Adams County 6,10 9.9 (5.9, 15.7) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-6.0, 13.2)
Marshall County 6,10 8.3 (4.7, 13.6) 3
*
*
Attala County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coahoma County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leflore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/26/2016 6:14 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top