Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 453.2 (451.0, 455.4) N/A 34,317 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Adair County 6 414.7 (378.8, 453.1) 90 (30, 111) 107 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Andrew County 6 459.6 (420.5, 501.5) 43 (5, 100) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Atchison County 6 373.4 (311.2, 445.7) 106 (22, 115) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Audrain County 6 470.2 (436.7, 505.8) 32 (5, 85) 154 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Barry County 6 413.0 (387.6, 439.7) 91 (48, 108) 216 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.2, 7.3)
Barton County 6 455.6 (408.4, 507.2) 50 (3, 105) 75 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Bates County 6 403.5 (365.6, 444.6) 99 (34, 113) 91 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Benton County 6 474.2 (438.6, 512.6) 31 (3, 86) 172 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Bollinger County 6 430.2 (384.9, 479.8) 77 (9, 111) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Boone County 6 433.8 (419.5, 448.5) 73 (44, 92) 737 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Buchanan County 6 458.5 (440.0, 477.7) 46 (19, 80) 486 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Butler County 6 459.9 (434.5, 486.5) 41 (12, 85) 262 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Caldwell County 6 369.2 (320.6, 423.5) 108 (49, 115) 46 falling falling trend -6.6 (-11.3, -1.7)
Callaway County 6 462.9 (437.2, 489.9) 40 (10, 84) 255 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Camden County 6 409.7 (388.3, 432.3) 94 (58, 108) 340 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Cape Girardeau County 6 467.6 (447.6, 488.3) 36 (13, 72) 439 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Carroll County 6 425.3 (375.0, 481.3) 78 (7, 113) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Carter County 6 432.7 (369.4, 504.5) 76 (2, 114) 36 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.3, -1.9)
Cass County 6 451.4 (434.8, 468.5) 54 (26, 81) 586 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Cedar County 6 406.8 (368.0, 449.2) 97 (29, 113) 90 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Chariton County 6 476.3 (418.2, 541.1) 26 (1, 104) 57 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Christian County 6 433.5 (415.1, 452.6) 74 (39, 97) 433 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Clark County 6 448.1 (388.5, 515.2) 59 (2, 112) 45 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Clay County 6 453.5 (442.0, 465.3) 52 (29, 74) 1,220 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Clinton County 6 500.2 (461.9, 540.9) 13 (1, 70) 135 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.2)
Cole County 6 450.6 (431.0, 470.9) 58 (22, 87) 421 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Cooper County 6 487.6 (446.0, 532.2) 17 (1, 83) 108 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Crawford County 6 509.6 (474.3, 547.0) 8 (1, 56) 169 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Dade County 6 402.1 (348.8, 462.3) 100 (16, 115) 47 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Dallas County 6 475.7 (435.2, 519.2) 27 (2, 90) 113 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Daviess County 6 435.0 (379.8, 496.5) 70 (4, 113) 50 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
DeKalb County 6 417.3 (372.0, 467.1) 87 (16, 113) 64 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Dent County 6 409.4 (371.1, 450.9) 95 (30, 113) 94 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Douglas County 6 326.7 (292.0, 365.1) 115 (102, 115) 73 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Dunklin County 6 494.3 (462.7, 527.6) 15 (1, 63) 194 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Franklin County 6 491.0 (473.8, 508.8) 16 (6, 43) 656 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Gasconade County 6 477.9 (436.2, 523.0) 23 (2, 94) 110 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Gentry County 6 396.3 (338.4, 462.1) 103 (15, 115) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Greene County 6 418.1 (408.2, 428.2) 86 (68, 98) 1,430 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Grundy County 6 450.6 (398.8, 507.8) 57 (2, 110) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Harrison County 6 501.4 (443.3, 565.5) 11 (1, 94) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Henry County 6 458.8 (424.8, 495.2) 45 (5, 96) 149 stable stable trend -10.2 (-20.5, 1.5)
Hickory County 6 380.3 (332.9, 433.6) 105 (40, 115) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Holt County 6 474.2 (397.9, 562.5) 30 (1, 113) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Howard County 6 407.0 (357.3, 462.1) 96 (16, 114) 54 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Howell County 6 401.3 (376.9, 427.0) 101 (60, 111) 217 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Iron County 6 514.1 (462.0, 571.1) 6 (1, 77) 79 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Jackson County 6 450.6 (443.9, 457.4) 56 (39, 71) 3,613 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Jasper County 6 499.2 (482.3, 516.5) 14 (3, 35) 686 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 476.6 (464.6, 488.9) 25 (14, 49) 1,274 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Johnson County 6 451.0 (424.9, 478.2) 55 (12, 94) 236 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Knox County 6 420.0 (345.7, 507.4) 83 (2, 115) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Laclede County 6 446.6 (418.8, 475.8) 62 (17, 96) 205 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lafayette County 6 467.6 (438.5, 498.3) 35 (7, 84) 206 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Lawrence County 6 433.1 (407.0, 460.5) 75 (25, 102) 218 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lewis County 6 453.3 (400.4, 511.5) 53 (3, 108) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Lincoln County 6 474.7 (450.1, 500.2) 29 (8, 74) 297 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Linn County 6 437.1 (392.8, 485.6) 68 (8, 109) 78 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Livingston County 6 446.0 (404.4, 491.0) 64 (6, 107) 90 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Macon County 6 467.7 (425.7, 513.0) 34 (3, 96) 102 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Madison County 6 506.8 (458.3, 559.4) 9 (1, 75) 86 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Maries County 6 363.8 (317.3, 416.2) 111 (59, 115) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Marion County 6 537.2 (502.8, 573.5) 2 (1, 28) 194 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
McDonald County 6 438.4 (403.2, 476.0) 67 (13, 106) 120 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.8, 4.1)
Mercer County 6 447.8 (368.0, 541.7) 60 (1, 115) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.3)
Miller County 6 459.6 (426.5, 494.6) 42 (7, 95) 155 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Mississippi County 6 535.3 (487.4, 586.9) 3 (1, 44) 95 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Moniteau County 6 425.0 (383.7, 469.6) 79 (13, 111) 80 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Monroe County 6 475.4 (420.9, 535.8) 28 (1, 103) 63 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Montgomery County 6 553.8 (501.7, 610.4) 1 (1, 40) 91 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Morgan County 6 482.7 (446.3, 521.5) 20 (2, 78) 153 stable stable trend -6.6 (-13.3, 0.6)
New Madrid County 6 484.0 (444.2, 526.7) 19 (1, 86) 116 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Newton County 6 419.0 (398.2, 440.7) 85 (52, 104) 321 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Nodaway County 6 421.6 (384.2, 461.8) 82 (20, 110) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Oregon County 6 364.6 (321.0, 413.0) 110 (62, 115) 59 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.0)
Osage County 6 485.4 (438.8, 535.8) 18 (1, 92) 85 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.1)
Ozark County 6 410.3 (362.0, 464.4) 93 (16, 114) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Pemiscot County 6 419.4 (379.7, 462.4) 84 (19, 112) 87 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Perry County 6 464.4 (426.9, 504.5) 39 (4, 96) 120 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Pettis County 6 464.7 (438.3, 492.4) 38 (9, 82) 244 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Phelps County 6 455.7 (429.4, 483.2) 49 (13, 90) 240 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pike County 6 479.9 (440.2, 522.5) 22 (2, 87) 113 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Platte County 6 423.6 (406.4, 441.3) 81 (53, 101) 484 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Polk County 6 372.8 (345.6, 401.7) 107 (82, 115) 150 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Pulaski County 6 500.4 (469.1, 533.1) 12 (1, 62) 199 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Putnam County 6 415.0 (348.9, 491.6) 89 (2, 115) 32 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Ralls County 6 440.2 (391.4, 494.2) 66 (5, 111) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Randolph County 6 477.6 (443.0, 514.3) 24 (3, 86) 146 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Ray County 6 454.2 (420.1, 490.6) 51 (8, 97) 141 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Reynolds County 6 412.8 (354.1, 479.7) 92 (8, 115) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Ripley County 6 446.1 (404.0, 491.8) 63 (6, 106) 89 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Saline County 6 433.8 (400.2, 469.7) 72 (18, 107) 132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Schuyler County 6 436.8 (362.2, 523.1) 69 (1, 115) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Scotland County 6 342.9 (278.8, 418.0) 114 (41, 115) 22 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.4)
Scott County 6 513.1 (484.6, 543.1) 7 (1, 38) 256 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.9)
Shannon County 6 351.0 (303.2, 405.0) 113 (67, 115) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Shelby County 6 521.6 (451.9, 600.0) 5 (1, 98) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
St. Charles County 6 458.0 (449.1, 467.0) 47 (30, 66) 2,107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
St. Clair County 6 365.6 (321.9, 414.6) 109 (56, 115) 60 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
St. Francois County 6 522.7 (500.5, 545.7) 4 (1, 23) 430 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
St. Louis City 6 447.5 (437.2, 458.0) 61 (36, 78) 1,536 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
St. Louis County 6 467.6 (462.1, 473.0) 37 (24, 51) 6,076 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 456.3 (417.9, 497.7) 48 (6, 103) 114 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.0)
Stoddard County 6 505.5 (474.0, 538.8) 10 (1, 53) 206 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.5)
Stone County 6 395.3 (369.8, 422.3) 104 (64, 112) 236 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Sullivan County 6 360.9 (305.0, 424.9) 112 (41, 115) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Taney County 6 416.1 (395.1, 437.9) 88 (53, 106) 329 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Texas County 6 405.2 (375.5, 436.9) 98 (48, 111) 150 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Vernon County 6 400.0 (366.7, 435.8) 102 (48, 113) 114 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Warren County 6 433.8 (406.1, 463.1) 71 (26, 103) 195 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Washington County 6 459.1 (425.4, 495.0) 44 (7, 94) 146 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Wayne County 6 424.6 (383.4, 469.5) 80 (14, 111) 89 falling falling trend -6.8 (-12.6, -0.6)
Webster County 6 441.1 (413.7, 470.0) 65 (20, 98) 200 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Worth County 6 480.3 (370.1, 617.2) 21 (1, 115) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Wright County 6 470.0 (431.2, 511.6) 33 (3, 95) 117 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 8:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top