Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 *** 19.7 (19.2, 20.1) N/A 1,498 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.7 (19.6, 19.7) N/A 75,383 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Chariton County 6 *** 33.1 (19.8, 53.5) 1 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Iron County 6 *** 31.9 (20.6, 48.3) 2 (1, 77) 5
*
*
St. Francois County 6 *** 28.9 (23.9, 34.7) 3 (1, 37) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.1)
Madison County 6 *** 27.9 (17.7, 42.5) 4 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.3, 7.0)
New Madrid County 6 *** 27.3 (18.8, 38.8) 5 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.1)
Linn County 6 *** 27.2 (17.5, 41.2) 6 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.4, 8.5)
Marion County 6 *** 27.2 (20.3, 36.0) 7 (1, 69) 10 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.0, 9.3)
Dallas County 6 *** 26.4 (17.4, 38.8) 8 (1, 79) 6 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.0)
Dade County 6 *** 26.0 (14.4, 44.9) 9 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Mississippi County 6 *** 25.7 (16.1, 39.3) 10 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-4.4, 9.5)
Franklin County 6 *** 25.6 (21.8, 29.9) 11 (2, 46) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Moniteau County 6 *** 25.4 (16.4, 37.9) 12 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 6 *** 24.5 (21.7, 27.5) 13 (5, 46) 61 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.9)
Barry County 6 *** 24.2 (18.5, 31.4) 14 (2, 73) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.5)
Audrain County 6 *** 24.2 (17.1, 33.3) 15 (1, 78) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Cooper County 6 *** 24.1 (15.8, 35.6) 16 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.1)
Pettis County 6 *** 24.1 (18.4, 31.1) 17 (1, 73) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.5)
Clinton County 6 *** 23.9 (16.3, 34.2) 18 (1, 82) 6
*
*
Lewis County 6 *** 23.9 (13.8, 39.5) 19 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Lafayette County 6 *** 23.7 (17.7, 31.3) 20 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.8)
Pulaski County 6 *** 23.7 (17.1, 31.8) 21 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.3)
Webster County 6 *** 23.6 (17.6, 31.1) 22 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.0)
Perry County 6 *** 23.4 (15.6, 34.1) 23 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.4, 3.9)
St. Charles County 6 *** 23.3 (21.3, 25.4) 24 (10, 44) 102 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Carroll County 6 *** 23.0 (13.3, 38.7) 25 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Morgan County 6 *** 23.0 (16.4, 32.1) 26 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.1)
Grundy County 6 *** 22.5 (12.1, 38.8) 27 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Cole County 6 *** 22.5 (18.2, 27.4) 28 (4, 70) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Washington County 6 *** 22.4 (15.4, 31.7) 29 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 4.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 22.2 (12.6, 38.1) 30 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Callaway County 6 *** 22.2 (16.7, 29.0) 31 (2, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.2)
Stoddard County 6 *** 21.9 (15.8, 29.8) 32 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 6.7)
Butler County 6 *** 21.9 (16.9, 28.0) 33 (4, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.7)
Miller County 6 *** 21.7 (15.3, 30.2) 34 (2, 82) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.9)
Camden County 6 *** 21.4 (17.1, 26.8) 35 (6, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.6)
Wright County 6 *** 21.3 (14.3, 31.0) 36 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.7, 4.9)
Buchanan County 6 *** 21.0 (17.2, 25.4) 37 (8, 73) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.4)
Harrison County 6 *** 20.9 (11.8, 36.0) 38 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Clay County 6 *** 20.9 (18.4, 23.6) 39 (15, 65) 54 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Phelps County 6 *** 20.8 (15.6, 27.2) 40 (5, 81) 11 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.2, 12.4)
Taney County 6 *** 20.6 (16.4, 25.7) 41 (7, 77) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Osage County 6 *** 20.5 (12.0, 33.2) 42 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Jasper County 6 *** 20.4 (17.2, 24.1) 43 (12, 72) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Scott County 6 *** 20.4 (15.3, 26.9) 44 (5, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1)
Warren County 6 *** 20.3 (14.7, 27.5) 45 (4, 82) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.1)
Boone County 6 *** 20.0 (17.0, 23.5) 46 (14, 73) 32 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.4)
Randolph County 6 *** 20.0 (13.5, 28.8) 47 (2, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.4)
Cape Girardeau County 6 *** 20.0 (16.2, 24.6) 48 (10, 77) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.1)
Pike County 6 *** 20.0 (12.9, 30.0) 49 (2, 84) 5
*
*
Stone County 6 *** 20.0 (15.3, 26.3) 50 (7, 80) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.9)
Benton County 6 *** 19.6 (14.0, 27.9) 51 (6, 83) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.8)
St. Louis County 6 *** 19.5 (18.4, 20.6) 52 (31, 61) 262 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Macon County 6 *** 19.3 (12.4, 29.5) 53 (3, 84) 5
*
*
Barton County 6 *** 19.2 (10.6, 32.6) 54 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Lawrence County 6 *** 19.2 (14.3, 25.5) 55 (7, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.9)
Greene County 6 *** 19.1 (17.0, 21.3) 56 (27, 71) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Nodaway County 6 *** 19.0 (11.9, 29.1) 57 (3, 84) 5
*
*
Ray County 6 *** 18.9 (12.7, 27.3) 58 (3, 84) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.4, 2.6)
St. Clair County 6 *** 18.5 (10.6, 32.1) 59 (2, 84) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.5, 4.6)
Christian County 6 *** 18.3 (14.6, 22.8) 60 (16, 80) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.0)
Saline County 6 *** 18.3 (12.0, 26.9) 61 (4, 84) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.4, 4.0)
Wayne County 6 *** 17.3 (10.5, 28.0) 62 (4, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 17.2 (16.0, 18.6) 63 (45, 75) 136 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Texas County 6 *** 17.1 (11.5, 24.8) 64 (9, 84) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.0)
Hickory County 6 *** 17.1 (10.1, 30.6) 65 (4, 84) 4 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.1, 0.9)
Cass County 6 *** 16.9 (13.9, 20.5) 66 (30, 81) 22 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.3)
Henry County 6 *** 16.9 (11.0, 25.2) 67 (6, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.6, 6.2)
Polk County 6 *** 16.8 (11.6, 23.7) 68 (12, 84) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 6.4)
Platte County 6 *** 16.8 (13.4, 20.7) 69 (26, 82) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-26.2, 39.8)
Lincoln County 6 *** 16.7 (12.3, 22.3) 70 (16, 84) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.6, -1.2)
Newton County 6 *** 16.1 (12.3, 20.7) 71 (27, 84) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 5.7)
St. Louis City 6 *** 16.0 (14.1, 18.2) 72 (45, 81) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Laclede County 6 *** 15.7 (11.0, 21.9) 73 (17, 84) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.0, -0.1)
Crawford County 6 *** 15.5 (10.1, 23.2) 74 (13, 84) 5 falling falling trend -7.6 (-14.3, -0.3)
Vernon County 6 *** 15.5 (9.7, 23.8) 75 (11, 84) 5 stable stable trend -26.9 (-49.2, 5.3)
Dunklin County 6 *** 15.3 (10.5, 21.8) 76 (15, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.1, 2.6)
Gasconade County 6 *** 14.8 (8.9, 24.3) 77 (12, 84) 4 stable stable trend -3.7 (-10.0, 3.0)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 *** 14.8 (9.0, 23.6) 78 (10, 84) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.0, 1.5)
Adair County 6 *** 13.9 (8.5, 21.9) 79 (17, 84) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.1, 1.9)
Johnson County 6 *** 13.8 (9.5, 19.2) 80 (31, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.5, 2.3)
McDonald County 6 *** 13.6 (8.2, 21.5) 81 (19, 84) 4
*
*
Cedar County 6 *** 13.1 (7.4, 22.6) 82 (16, 84) 3 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.5, 3.2)
Dent County 6 *** 13.1 (7.6, 21.9) 83 (20, 84) 3
*
*
Howell County 6 *** 11.6 (8.0, 16.4) 84 (55, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 3.9)
Andrew County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atchison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2021 7:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top