Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 11.7 (11.3, 12.1) N/A 762 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 13.3 (13.2, 13.3) N/A 44,551 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.5)
Andrew County 6 18.7 (10.4, 30.7) 4 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Barry County 6 9.3 (5.3, 15.2) 45 (8, 49) 4 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.9, 10.6)
Boone County 6 10.3 (8.2, 12.7) 43 (17, 48) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.7)
Buchanan County 6 13.5 (10.2, 17.6) 19 (4, 45) 12 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.8, 9.2)
Butler County 6 11.7 (7.5, 17.3) 32 (5, 49) 5
*
*
Callaway County 6 7.2 (4.3, 11.6) 49 (21, 49) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.4, 8.4)
Camden County 6 8.1 (4.4, 13.6) 46 (13, 49) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.0, 6.9)
Cape Girardeau County 6 12.2 (9.0, 16.2) 27 (6, 47) 10 falling falling trend -4.5 (-18.7, -1.6)
Cass County 6 12.7 (9.8, 16.1) 22 (7, 46) 14 falling falling trend -6.8 (-22.9, -0.9)
Christian County 6 13.7 (10.4, 17.7) 17 (4, 44) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 5.1)
Clay County 6 12.6 (10.7, 14.7) 23 (10, 43) 32 falling falling trend -4.2 (-10.0, -1.4)
Cole County 6 11.5 (8.4, 15.3) 33 (8, 48) 10 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 8.5)
Crawford County 6 22.4 (14.2, 33.5) 2 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 6.2)
Dent County 6 18.5 (10.3, 30.7) 5 (1, 49) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.6, 6.1)
Dunklin County 6 12.4 (7.3, 19.7) 25 (3, 49) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6 13.0 (10.0, 16.5) 21 (6, 44) 15 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.5)
Gasconade County 6 17.1 (9.1, 29.4) 9 (1, 49) 3
*
*
Greene County 6 10.7 (9.1, 12.6) 40 (17, 47) 31 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.3)
Henry County 6 16.4 (9.7, 26.0) 11 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Howell County 6 11.8 (7.4, 17.8) 29 (4, 49) 5 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.3, 12.3)
Jackson County 6 11.3 (10.2, 12.4) 37 (20, 44) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.8, -0.1)
Jasper County 6 15.6 (12.6, 19.1) 12 (3, 35) 19 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.7, 9.1)
Jefferson County 6 10.9 (9.1, 13.1) 39 (16, 46) 26 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 0.3)
Johnson County 6 11.7 (7.6, 17.1) 31 (5, 49) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.5, 11.0)
Laclede County 6 9.8 (5.7, 15.7) 44 (6, 49) 4
*
*
Lafayette County 6 12.3 (7.5, 19.1) 26 (3, 49) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.8, 11.9)
Lawrence County 6 14.3 (9.4, 20.8) 15 (2, 48) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 7.4)
Lincoln County 6 10.7 (7.2, 15.4) 41 (8, 49) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.5, 5.9)
Marion County 6 19.2 (12.7, 27.9) 3 (1, 42) 6
*
*
Newton County 6 13.3 (9.5, 18.3) 20 (4, 47) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.1, 4.5)
Osage County 6 23.4 (13.3, 38.2) 1 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Perry County 6 16.7 (9.9, 26.6) 10 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Pettis County 6 11.7 (7.5, 17.4) 30 (4, 49) 5
*
*
Phelps County 6 17.5 (12.0, 24.5) 7 (1, 42) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.1, 16.0)
Platte County 6 12.5 (9.7, 16.0) 24 (7, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.9)
Polk County 6 10.6 (5.8, 17.4) 42 (4, 49) 3
*
*
Pulaski County 6 11.4 (7.4, 16.9) 34 (5, 49) 6
*
*
Scott County 6 15.1 (9.9, 21.9) 13 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.7, 6.1)
St. Charles County 6 12.2 (10.7, 13.9) 28 (13, 41) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
St. Francois County 6 11.4 (8.0, 15.6) 35 (7, 49) 8 stable stable trend -4.5 (-29.2, 3.0)
St. Louis City 6 7.8 (6.5, 9.4) 48 (38, 49) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.6)
St. Louis County 6 11.3 (10.3, 12.2) 38 (21, 43) 124 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.2, -0.4)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 17.4 (9.7, 28.7) 8 (1, 49) 3
*
*
Stoddard County 6 14.4 (8.7, 22.2) 14 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.6, 12.1)
Stone County 6 11.3 (6.4, 18.6) 36 (3, 49) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-5.1, 15.0)
Taney County 6 13.6 (9.6, 18.7) 18 (3, 47) 9 rising rising trend 6.6 (1.8, 13.5)
Texas County 6 14.0 (8.0, 22.5) 16 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.9, 10.0)
Warren County 6 7.9 (4.4, 13.2) 47 (13, 49) 3
*
*
Washington County 6 18.1 (11.2, 27.7) 6 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.1, 7.3)
Adair County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atchison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audrain County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cedar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chariton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Linn County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDonald County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mississippi County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moniteau County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
New Madrid County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nodaway County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pemiscot County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ray County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saline County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top