Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 N/A 105.4 (103.9, 107.0) N/A 3,780 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 108.2 (104.4, 112.1) 46 (30, 68) 623 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Jackson County 6 Urban 104.7 (100.4, 109.2) 62 (37, 77) 451 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
St. Charles County 6 Urban 108.6 (102.8, 114.5) 45 (27, 73) 270 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
St. Louis City 6 Urban 93.4 (87.2, 99.9) 88 (58, 96) 179 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Clay County 6 Urban 107.2 (100.1, 114.6) 53 (27, 80) 173 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Greene County 6 Urban 98.2 (91.6, 105.2) 75 (43, 92) 168 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 104.1 (96.7, 112.0) 63 (29, 85) 145 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Boone County 6 Urban 107.8 (98.9, 117.3) 50 (23, 83) 112 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Jasper County 6 Urban 116.7 (105.8, 128.4) 32 (11, 71) 85 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 9.1)
Franklin County 6 Urban 121.3 (109.0, 134.6) 25 (8, 70) 71 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.4)
Cass County 6 Urban 109.1 (97.8, 121.2) 44 (17, 88) 69 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.9)
Platte County 6 Urban 96.9 (86.7, 108.1) 80 (32, 98) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 0.5)
Buchanan County 6 Urban 108.4 (95.8, 122.2) 47 (14, 90) 54 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.6)
Christian County 6 Urban 98.2 (86.8, 110.7) 74 (30, 98) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Cape Girardeau County 6 Urban 115.0 (101.3, 130.0) 34 (9, 82) 52 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.4)
Cole County 6 Urban 106.5 (93.6, 120.6) 55 (17, 93) 50 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.8, 0.6)
St. Francois County 6 Rural 111.0 (97.3, 126.2) 43 (12, 88) 47 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 120.9 (105.1, 138.3) 24 (6, 76) 42 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Pulaski County 6 Rural 99.9 (84.0, 117.7) 71 (16, 101) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.2)
Taney County 6 Rural 101.6 (86.0, 119.1) 66 (16, 100) 30 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 2.9)
Johnson County 6 Rural 103.6 (87.2, 122.0) 64 (15, 100) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Newton County 6 Urban 86.3 (72.7, 101.7) 98 (42, 105) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Howell County 6 Rural 119.6 (100.1, 141.7) 28 (4, 89) 27 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 3.9)
Callaway County 6 Urban 96.9 (80.7, 115.2) 79 (18, 103) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.8)
Phelps County 6 Rural 106.7 (88.8, 127.1) 48 (10, 99) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Butler County 6 Rural 104.9 (87.2, 125.1) 60 (12, 101) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Scott County 6 Rural 108.0 (89.0, 129.6) 51 (9, 100) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Laclede County 6 Rural 112.8 (92.8, 135.7) 40 (5, 98) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9)
Pettis County 6 Rural 89.1 (73.2, 107.3) 94 (28, 105) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.5)
Marion County 6 Rural 136.0 (111.6, 164.0) 7 (1, 74) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.7)
Webster County 6 Urban 93.4 (76.3, 113.2) 89 (24, 105) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Polk County 6 Urban 119.9 (97.4, 145.8) 26 (3, 94) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.3)
Warren County 6 Urban 98.4 (79.6, 120.2) 65 (11, 102) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.0)
Stoddard County 6 Rural 114.5 (92.6, 140.0) 38 (4, 99) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.5)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 87.7 (70.8, 107.3) 96 (29, 105) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 1.9)
Lafayette County 6 Urban 100.6 (81.1, 123.3) 68 (12, 103) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Camden County 6 Rural 93.0 (74.9, 114.2) 87 (19, 105) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Dunklin County 6 Rural 111.5 (89.5, 137.2) 41 (4, 101) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.1)
Audrain County 6 Rural 112.8 (90.0, 139.5) 39 (4, 100) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-12.5, -0.2)
Stone County 6 Rural 115.0 (91.4, 142.9) 33 (2, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.1)
Crawford County 6 Rural 129.4 (102.7, 160.8) 11 (1, 90) 16 stable stable trend -13.5 (-26.5, 0.8)
Barry County 6 Rural 87.1 (69.0, 108.5) 97 (28, 105) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.0)
Randolph County 6 Rural 102.4 (81.0, 127.7) 67 (10, 104) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.1)
Henry County 6 Rural 125.1 (98.0, 157.3) 15 (1, 94) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.4)
Miller County 6 Rural 105.9 (82.8, 133.4) 59 (7, 104) 14 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.3)
Texas County 6 Rural 100.0 (77.6, 126.7) 69 (8, 104) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Washington County 6 Rural 91.5 (70.7, 116.6) 92 (16, 105) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Saline County 6 Rural 106.1 (81.7, 135.2) 58 (6, 104) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-8.8, -0.1)
Morgan County 6 Rural 125.6 (96.5, 160.4) 19 (1, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.0)
Cooper County 6 Urban 131.9 (101.2, 168.7) 10 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.7, 6.2)
Ray County 6 Urban 94.5 (72.5, 121.0) 85 (13, 105) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.1)
Clinton County 6 Urban 99.3 (75.7, 127.9) 72 (7, 105) 12 falling falling trend -15.9 (-30.7, -0.6)
Moniteau County 6 Urban 124.3 (94.8, 159.9) 20 (1, 101) 12 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.1, 15.8)
McDonald County 6 Rural 85.8 (65.0, 110.9) 99 (20, 105) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.4)
Dallas County 6 Urban 126.5 (95.7, 163.9) 16 (1, 99) 11 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.8, 6.8)
Nodaway County 6 Rural 108.3 (81.4, 140.9) 49 (4, 104) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.2)
Pike County 6 Rural 107.2 (80.8, 139.4) 54 (5, 105) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Macon County 6 Rural 130.7 (98.1, 170.6) 12 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.8)
Perry County 6 Rural 98.7 (73.9, 129.1) 76 (8, 105) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 2.8)
Osage County 6 Urban 135.7 (101.2, 178.0) 8 (1, 99) 10 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.6, 6.4)
Benton County 6 Rural 114.9 (84.9, 152.0) 37 (2, 104) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 3.5)
Andrew County 6 Urban 95.6 (70.7, 126.3) 78 (6, 105) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.5)
Livingston County 6 Rural 105.4 (77.4, 140.2) 61 (3, 105) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-22.7, -0.1)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 Rural 90.7 (66.4, 121.0) 93 (12, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.7)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 146.1 (106.4, 195.4) 3 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.2, 5.5)
Wright County 6 Rural 92.2 (67.1, 123.3) 91 (11, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Adair County 6 Rural 82.9 (60.0, 111.3) 102 (19, 105) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.1)
Madison County 6 Rural 119.9 (86.6, 161.6) 27 (1, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.1)
Vernon County 6 Rural 80.8 (58.4, 108.7) 103 (26, 105) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Bates County 6 Urban 97.1 (69.9, 131.1) 81 (6, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.3)
Bollinger County 6 Urban 142.6 (102.6, 193.0) 4 (1, 100) 8 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.3, 5.3)
Dent County 6 Rural 106.9 (76.6, 144.9) 56 (3, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.4)
Pemiscot County 6 Rural 94.3 (67.6, 127.7) 86 (9, 105) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.5, 6.1)
Ripley County 6 Rural 134.3 (96.3, 182.1) 9 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 2.8)
Lewis County 6 Rural 150.9 (106.8, 206.3) 2 (1, 97) 8 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.4, 10.4)
New Madrid County 6 Rural 84.4 (60.1, 115.1) 101 (14, 105) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 0.9)
Barton County 6 Rural 126.3 (89.3, 173.0) 17 (1, 103) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.1, 7.2)
Gasconade County 6 Rural 97.2 (68.6, 133.5) 73 (5, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.6)
Iron County 6 Rural 138.7 (97.5, 191.4) 6 (1, 101) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.1)
Mississippi County 6 Rural 96.0 (67.5, 132.3) 84 (7, 105) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.0)
Oregon County 6 Rural 165.8 (116.4, 228.6) 1 (1, 88) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 7.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 123.9 (86.6, 171.8) 21 (1, 105) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 5.4)
DeKalb County 6 Urban 89.0 (61.4, 125.0) 95 (9, 105) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.3)
Linn County 6 Rural 108.9 (75.3, 152.0) 42 (1, 105) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.2, 4.5)
Cedar County 6 Rural 80.6 (54.2, 115.1) 104 (16, 105) 6 stable stable trend -4.8 (-25.6, 0.6)
Grundy County 6 Rural 127.8 (85.8, 182.1) 14 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 8.3)
Ralls County 6 Rural 107.8 (72.6, 154.0) 52 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 3.9)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 115.1 (76.3, 166.5) 36 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.0)
Dade County 6 Rural 129.6 (84.5, 190.1) 13 (1, 105) 5
*
*
Howard County 6 Urban 98.5 (64.2, 144.2) 77 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.8, 5.6)
Daviess County 6 Rural 115.6 (74.5, 170.6) 35 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.2)
Douglas County 6 Rural 85.6 (55.2, 126.3) 100 (7, 105) 5 stable stable trend 10.2 (-0.3, 43.3)
Harrison County 6 Rural 119.3 (76.3, 176.8) 29 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 4.8)
Ozark County 6 Rural 123.1 (78.7, 183.3) 23 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 4.6)
Shannon County 6 Rural 117.5 (74.3, 176.7) 31 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 4.1)
Hickory County 6 Rural 125.7 (78.3, 191.0) 18 (1, 105) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 7.6)
St. Clair County 6 Rural 96.6 (60.2, 146.6) 83 (2, 105) 4
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural 141.9 (87.7, 216.8) 5 (1, 105) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.9, -2.1)
Chariton County 6 Rural 117.8 (72.9, 179.4) 30 (1, 105) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.8, 4.4)
Clark County 6 Rural 123.5 (76.4, 188.1) 22 (1, 105) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.4, 9.4)
Monroe County 6 Rural 92.9 (56.6, 143.2) 90 (3, 105) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.7, 8.8)
Carroll County 6 Rural 74.9 (44.3, 118.5) 105 (8, 105) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 4.7)
Gentry County 6 Rural 106.4 (62.6, 168.1) 57 (1, 105) 4
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural 96.6 (56.0, 155.3) 70 (1, 105) 3
*
*
Reynolds County 6 Rural 97.1 (55.1, 158.6) 82 (1, 105) 3 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.3, 9.1)
Atchison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/08/2024 11:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top