Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Missouri 6 39.6 (39.0, 40.3) N/A 2,964 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Chariton County 6 42.7 (27.7, 64.7) 54 (2, 109) 6 stable stable trend 23.9 (-15.2, 81.2)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 58.0 (45.1, 73.8) 7 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 6.3)
Reynolds County 6 47.3 (28.3, 75.5) 36 (1, 109) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.6, 7.9)
Dallas County 6 51.2 (38.6, 67.0) 18 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 5.7)
Audrain County 6 49.3 (38.7, 62.0) 26 (2, 98) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.4)
Monroe County 6 49.2 (31.2, 74.3) 28 (1, 109) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.6)
Lafayette County 6 48.8 (39.3, 60.1) 30 (3, 97) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.8)
St. Charles County 6 34.5 (32.1, 37.0) 97 (71, 104) 157 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.3)
Dunklin County 6 58.0 (47.5, 70.4) 6 (1, 62) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Ralls County 6 49.7 (33.9, 71.1) 23 (1, 107) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.5)
Shannon County 6 35.3 (21.4, 56.0) 95 (3, 109) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.1, 5.4)
Barton County 6 60.1 (42.3, 82.9) 3 (1, 101) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.3)
Howell County 6 40.7 (33.2, 49.5) 72 (16, 105) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.3)
McDonald County 6 49.5 (37.9, 63.5) 25 (2, 101) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.2)
Osage County 6 47.3 (33.7, 64.9) 37 (2, 108) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 4.2)
Carroll County 6 53.1 (36.2, 76.1) 14 (1, 107) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.9)
Lewis County 6 57.1 (40.2, 79.5) 8 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.7)
Randolph County 6 54.7 (43.5, 68.0) 11 (1, 84) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Clark County 6 49.2 (32.3, 73.7) 27 (1, 109) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.1)
Linn County 6 54.4 (39.2, 74.1) 12 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.7)
Miller County 6 47.5 (37.4, 59.8) 34 (2, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Shelby County 6 50.7 (30.4, 80.4) 19 (1, 109) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 3.9)
Bates County 6 51.6 (38.4, 68.1) 16 (1, 104) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.9)
Johnson County 6 42.7 (34.8, 51.8) 55 (11, 102) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Crawford County 6 51.6 (40.8, 64.5) 17 (2, 95) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.2)
Gentry County 6 62.2 (40.9, 91.7) 2 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.6)
Carter County 6 41.8 (24.5, 68.1) 62 (1, 109) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 2.9)
Jasper County 6 47.1 (41.9, 52.7) 39 (12, 74) 63 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Laclede County 6 47.7 (38.8, 58.2) 33 (4, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Howard County 6 43.9 (28.4, 65.2) 51 (1, 109) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.8)
Newton County 6 41.2 (34.9, 48.4) 67 (19, 101) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Boone County 6 35.6 (31.6, 40.0) 92 (53, 105) 60 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Cooper County 6 50.0 (37.1, 66.1) 22 (1, 104) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.7)
Iron County 6 50.5 (34.9, 71.5) 20 (1, 107) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.8)
Jackson County 6 39.3 (37.3, 41.3) 78 (49, 89) 310 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Moniteau County 6 45.8 (33.0, 62.2) 46 (2, 107) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.2)
Barry County 6 44.2 (36.2, 53.7) 49 (8, 101) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.5)
Clinton County 6 58.3 (45.6, 73.7) 5 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.8)
Livingston County 6 47.2 (34.0, 64.0) 38 (2, 107) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Vernon County 6 44.8 (34.5, 57.7) 48 (4, 105) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Bollinger County 6 46.7 (32.7, 65.3) 43 (1, 107) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.2)
Cape Girardeau County 6 41.3 (35.4, 47.9) 66 (20, 100) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Cass County 6 41.3 (36.4, 46.7) 64 (25, 97) 53 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Morgan County 6 48.1 (37.0, 61.8) 32 (2, 104) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.4)
Pike County 6 54.1 (41.5, 69.7) 13 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
St. Francois County 6 47.0 (40.6, 54.3) 40 (8, 82) 39 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Stoddard County 6 48.9 (39.5, 60.1) 29 (3, 94) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Cole County 6 41.0 (35.2, 47.5) 69 (22, 102) 37 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Macon County 6 46.8 (34.0, 63.1) 42 (2, 107) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Montgomery County 6 55.2 (40.2, 74.7) 9 (1, 102) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Knox County 6 58.4 (33.0, 98.1) 4 (1, 109) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.8, 3.7)
Mississippi County 6 50.3 (36.2, 68.5) 21 (1, 106) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.9)
Pemiscot County 6 40.2 (28.8, 54.9) 75 (6, 109) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Daviess County 6 37.8 (23.5, 58.7) 82 (2, 109) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 2.5)
Greene County 6 35.2 (32.3, 38.2) 96 (65, 104) 118 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Lawrence County 6 42.5 (34.6, 51.7) 58 (12, 106) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Perry County 6 46.8 (35.8, 60.4) 41 (2, 103) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.4)
Phelps County 6 38.6 (31.2, 47.2) 81 (19, 107) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Marion County 6 52.6 (42.2, 64.9) 15 (1, 85) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.9)
Ozark County 6 31.5 (20.9, 47.9) 105 (20, 109) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.4)
Henry County 6 38.9 (29.5, 50.8) 79 (12, 108) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.6)
Madison County 6 43.1 (29.7, 60.9) 52 (2, 109) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.4)
Pettis County 6 41.3 (33.7, 50.2) 65 (13, 104) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Clay County 6 38.7 (35.4, 42.3) 80 (45, 98) 101 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Taney County 6 37.1 (31.0, 44.2) 86 (30, 107) 29 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.1)
DeKalb County 6 35.8 (24.0, 51.9) 89 (8, 109) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Sullivan County 6 48.2 (29.2, 76.1) 31 (1, 109) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.8)
Wright County 6 49.7 (37.7, 64.7) 24 (1, 103) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.3)
Buchanan County 6 42.7 (37.1, 48.9) 56 (19, 95) 44 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Camden County 6 34.3 (28.3, 41.3) 99 (39, 108) 28 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
Dent County 6 45.2 (32.9, 61.0) 47 (2, 107) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.1)
Ray County 6 40.8 (30.9, 53.1) 70 (7, 108) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Stone County 6 31.0 (24.4, 39.4) 106 (47, 109) 19 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.7)
Benton County 6 46.6 (35.4, 60.9) 44 (2, 105) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.5)
Callaway County 6 42.6 (35.0, 51.4) 57 (12, 103) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.6)
Franklin County 6 37.0 (32.4, 42.2) 87 (40, 105) 49 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Ripley County 6 41.9 (30.4, 57.1) 60 (5, 108) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
Christian County 6 37.5 (32.3, 43.4) 84 (36, 105) 38 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.7)
Hickory County 6 35.4 (22.6, 54.7) 94 (5, 109) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.6)
Maries County 6 35.7 (22.5, 55.0) 90 (6, 109) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.6, 1.3)
Texas County 6 35.4 (27.2, 45.7) 93 (23, 109) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.6)
Polk County 6 33.9 (26.1, 43.4) 100 (30, 109) 14 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.5, 0.0)
Scott County 6 39.9 (32.2, 49.0) 76 (17, 107) 20 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.4)
St. Louis County 6 36.4 (34.8, 37.9) 88 (68, 97) 467 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Butler County 6 42.4 (34.8, 51.2) 59 (12, 104) 23 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.8)
Adair County 6 45.8 (34.0, 60.5) 45 (2, 106) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.6)
Harrison County 6 47.5 (31.9, 69.1) 35 (1, 108) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.0, 0.0)
St. Louis City 6 40.3 (37.2, 43.6) 74 (39, 90) 135 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Jefferson County 6 37.8 (34.4, 41.4) 83 (46, 100) 97 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.1)
Pulaski County 6 40.4 (31.8, 50.6) 73 (11, 107) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.0, -0.3)
Webster County 6 30.6 (23.7, 39.0) 107 (50, 109) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.5)
Andrew County 6 41.8 (31.1, 55.4) 61 (5, 108) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.5)
Warren County 6 37.2 (29.0, 47.1) 85 (19, 108) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.1)
Platte County 6 31.7 (27.1, 36.9) 104 (67, 109) 36 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.1)
Dade County 6 41.4 (25.9, 64.3) 63 (1, 109) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.3, 0.4)
Nodaway County 6 42.9 (32.0, 56.7) 53 (4, 108) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.2, -0.9)
Wayne County 6 44.1 (32.2, 59.9) 50 (3, 108) 10 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.2, -0.1)
Lincoln County 6 39.8 (33.0, 47.7) 77 (19, 106) 25 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -1.6)
Grundy County 6 41.1 (27.3, 60.2) 68 (3, 109) 6 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -0.9)
Douglas County 6 33.2 (22.6, 47.9) 101 (16, 109) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.8, -0.6)
Saline County 6 35.6 (26.7, 46.8) 91 (18, 109) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.8, -2.0)
Washington County 6 34.3 (25.6, 45.2) 98 (24, 109) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.7, -1.0)
Gasconade County 6 32.7 (22.2, 47.0) 102 (15, 109) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.7, -2.3)
Cedar County 6 27.7 (19.2, 39.7) 108 (47, 109) 7 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.4)
St. Clair County 6 20.8 (12.4, 35.0) 109 (75, 109) 4 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.7, -3.0)
New Madrid County 6 40.7 (29.9, 54.5) 71 (5, 109) 10 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.6, -2.4)
Holt County 6 76.4 (44.2, 123.3) 1 (1, 103) 4
*
*
Mercer County 6 54.7 (31.1, 93.1) 10 (1, 109) 3
*
*
Oregon County 6 32.5 (21.4, 48.5) 103 (15, 109) 6
*
*
Atchison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 5:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atchison, Caldwell, Putnam, Schuyler, Scotland, Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top