Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 68.1 (67.3, 68.9) N/A 5,509 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.3, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Mississippi County 6 132.3 (109.5, 158.9) 1 (1, 14) 24 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.4)
Crawford County 6 107.2 (92.3, 124.1) 2 (1, 34) 38 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 3.0)
Montgomery County 6 106.8 (85.3, 132.6) 3 (1, 55) 18 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.1, 18.1)
St. Francois County 6 104.1 (94.7, 114.3) 4 (1, 20) 91 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
New Madrid County 6 96.0 (79.7, 115.2) 5 (1, 61) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Madison County 6 95.6 (76.3, 118.9) 6 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.2)
Dunklin County 6 95.5 (82.5, 110.1) 7 (1, 49) 40 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
Lincoln County 6 94.7 (84.1, 106.3) 8 (2, 42) 61 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Washington County 6 93.4 (79.0, 109.8) 9 (1, 57) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.4)
Stoddard County 6 93.0 (80.7, 107.1) 10 (2, 53) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Pemiscot County 6 92.6 (75.1, 113.2) 11 (1, 89) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Butler County 6 92.6 (81.9, 104.4) 12 (2, 48) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Ray County 6 91.7 (77.4, 108.2) 13 (2, 65) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Benton County 6 88.2 (75.1, 103.9) 14 (2, 75) 37 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.6)
Ripley County 6 87.9 (70.7, 108.7) 15 (1, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 3.1)
Morgan County 6 87.7 (73.4, 104.5) 16 (2, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.6)
Pulaski County 6 86.6 (73.9, 100.7) 17 (2, 76) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.6)
Wayne County 6 86.2 (69.7, 106.5) 18 (2, 92) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Henry County 6 85.9 (72.5, 101.5) 19 (2, 80) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.6)
Iron County 6 85.5 (65.8, 110.1) 20 (1, 103) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.3)
Randolph County 6 85.4 (71.4, 101.6) 21 (2, 81) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.7)
Macon County 6 85.3 (69.0, 104.9) 22 (2, 89) 20 rising rising trend 10.6 (2.7, 28.2)
Monroe County 6 84.6 (65.2, 109.6) 23 (2, 105) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 5.6)
Marion County 6 83.6 (71.0, 97.9) 24 (3, 86) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Franklin County 6 83.2 (76.6, 90.3) 25 (9, 56) 121 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Carter County 6 82.4 (59.0, 114.1) 26 (1, 113) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.5)
Scott County 6 81.5 (70.7, 93.6) 27 (6, 77) 43 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Dallas County 6 80.9 (66.0, 98.8) 28 (3, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Livingston County 6 80.8 (64.3, 100.7) 29 (2, 103) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.1)
Mercer County 6 80.8 (48.0, 129.6) 30 (1, 114) 4 stable stable trend -34.4 (-59.9, 1.1)
Warren County 6 80.7 (69.7, 93.1) 31 (5, 85) 40 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.4)
Chariton County 6 80.5 (58.4, 109.6) 32 (1, 112) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.0, 6.8)
Dent County 6 79.8 (64.5, 98.3) 33 (3, 102) 20 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 0.8)
Ozark County 6 79.1 (61.0, 102.7) 34 (2, 109) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Jasper County 6 79.1 (72.7, 85.9) 35 (14, 65) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Pettis County 6 78.9 (68.7, 90.3) 36 (8, 86) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Jefferson County 6 78.7 (74.1, 83.6) 37 (19, 60) 226 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Gasconade County 6 78.6 (63.6, 96.9) 38 (3, 103) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Cooper County 6 78.5 (62.8, 97.3) 39 (3, 107) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.9)
Audrain County 6 77.8 (65.2, 92.4) 40 (6, 98) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.2)
Callaway County 6 77.8 (67.8, 88.9) 41 (10, 84) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Buchanan County 6 77.7 (70.5, 85.6) 42 (15, 72) 87 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Shannon County 6 76.8 (57.2, 102.3) 43 (2, 112) 11 rising rising trend 17.9 (1.4, 34.5)
Clinton County 6 76.2 (62.5, 92.4) 44 (6, 105) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.6)
Dade County 6 75.9 (54.6, 104.1) 45 (2, 113) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.5)
Shelby County 6 75.2 (51.8, 107.3) 46 (2, 114) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.2)
Bates County 6 74.5 (59.7, 92.3) 47 (6, 108) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.9)
DeKalb County 6 74.4 (56.0, 97.3) 48 (3, 112) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.2)
St. Louis City 6 73.4 (69.3, 77.7) 49 (30, 73) 256 falling falling trend -3.6 (-8.2, -2.0)
Hickory County 6 72.9 (55.2, 96.4) 50 (4, 112) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Putnam County 6 72.4 (47.2, 108.6) 51 (1, 114) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.4, 3.8)
St. Clair County 6 72.2 (56.0, 93.4) 52 (6, 111) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Johnson County 6 71.9 (62.0, 82.9) 53 (16, 100) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Pike County 6 71.8 (57.7, 88.7) 54 (8, 110) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.4)
Miller County 6 71.6 (59.4, 85.7) 55 (10, 107) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Ralls County 6 71.2 (54.1, 93.1) 56 (4, 112) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 3.2)
McDonald County 6 71.0 (57.7, 86.6) 57 (9, 110) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Laclede County 6 70.9 (60.9, 82.3) 58 (16, 104) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Bollinger County 6 70.1 (54.3, 89.9) 59 (8, 112) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.4)
Lewis County 6 68.7 (50.3, 92.4) 60 (3, 113) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.4)
Camden County 6 68.6 (61.0, 77.3) 61 (28, 101) 65 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Polk County 6 68.4 (57.6, 80.8) 62 (20, 108) 30 stable stable trend 12.1 (-3.6, 25.7)
Webster County 6 68.4 (58.3, 79.8) 63 (20, 107) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 6.2)
Jackson County 6 68.0 (65.5, 70.6) 64 (50, 82) 573 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -1.0)
Newton County 6 67.5 (59.6, 76.2) 65 (29, 104) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Phelps County 6 67.5 (58.1, 78.0) 66 (24, 107) 38 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Oregon County 6 67.4 (51.3, 88.2) 67 (8, 112) 13 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.8)
Clay County 6 67.2 (62.9, 71.7) 68 (46, 92) 190 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Howell County 6 66.8 (57.7, 77.2) 69 (28, 108) 40 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Cedar County 6 65.8 (51.4, 83.6) 70 (12, 113) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Andrew County 6 65.6 (52.2, 81.9) 71 (14, 112) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.4)
Cass County 6 65.5 (59.6, 71.9) 72 (43, 102) 92 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Grundy County 6 65.5 (48.4, 87.6) 73 (5, 114) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.1)
Barry County 6 65.2 (56.0, 75.7) 74 (28, 109) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Texas County 6 64.9 (54.3, 77.5) 75 (28, 111) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Vernon County 6 64.9 (52.5, 79.7) 76 (19, 112) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.6)
Lafayette County 6 64.7 (54.9, 76.0) 77 (27, 110) 31 falling falling trend -12.9 (-22.8, -1.3)
Adair County 6 64.6 (51.6, 80.0) 78 (17, 112) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.9, 3.5)
Caldwell County 6 64.4 (46.1, 88.5) 79 (5, 114) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.5, 2.9)
Cole County 6 64.0 (57.0, 71.7) 80 (43, 106) 63 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.8, 0.7)
Perry County 6 63.9 (51.0, 79.4) 81 (18, 113) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.2)
Linn County 6 63.8 (48.7, 83.0) 82 (12, 114) 12 stable stable trend -4.7 (-28.3, 1.2)
Howard County 6 63.6 (46.0, 86.4) 83 (7, 114) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.2, 3.9)
Wright County 6 63.2 (50.4, 78.8) 84 (18, 113) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Carroll County 6 62.9 (45.0, 86.6) 85 (7, 114) 9 falling falling trend -8.3 (-28.7, -2.1)
Maries County 6 62.0 (44.8, 85.0) 86 (7, 114) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 4.1)
Clark County 6 61.9 (42.0, 89.4) 87 (5, 114) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 6.8)
Harrison County 6 61.4 (43.2, 85.7) 88 (9, 114) 8 falling falling trend -5.7 (-21.4, -0.5)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 61.3 (48.6, 76.8) 89 (22, 114) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.5, -0.6)
Lawrence County 6 61.1 (52.1, 71.4) 90 (38, 112) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Taney County 6 60.9 (53.6, 69.0) 91 (47, 110) 54 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Moniteau County 6 60.6 (46.1, 78.5) 92 (17, 114) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 5.2)
Reynolds County 6 60.6 (40.8, 88.7) 93 (5, 114) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.5, 3.2)
Saline County 6 60.5 (48.8, 74.4) 94 (36, 113) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 2.0)
Sullivan County 6 60.5 (39.9, 89.5) 95 (4, 114) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.9, 1.6)
Cape Girardeau County 6 60.3 (53.5, 67.7) 96 (53, 110) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Gentry County 6 59.3 (38.8, 88.0) 97 (7, 114) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 3.4)
Osage County 6 59.2 (44.6, 77.7) 98 (20, 114) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.6)
Knox County 6 59.0 (35.2, 96.1) 99 (2, 114) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 4.0)
Boone County 6 59.0 (53.9, 64.3) 100 (65, 109) 106 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Nodaway County 6 58.6 (45.7, 74.3) 101 (29, 114) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.3)
St. Louis County 6 58.4 (56.6, 60.3) 102 (80, 105) 808 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
St. Charles County 6 58.3 (55.3, 61.5) 103 (76, 107) 281 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Schuyler County 6 56.6 (34.5, 90.0) 104 (5, 114) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.9, 5.8)
Platte County 6 56.3 (50.3, 62.8) 105 (70, 112) 68 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Greene County 6 55.9 (52.5, 59.5) 106 (82, 110) 204 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Atchison County 6 52.9 (31.1, 86.0) 107 (10, 114) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.9, 4.7)
Douglas County 6 52.2 (40.0, 68.0) 108 (42, 114) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.1)
Christian County 6 51.5 (45.5, 58.1) 109 (83, 114) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.6)
Stone County 6 50.6 (43.2, 59.5) 110 (69, 114) 36 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Barton County 6 49.4 (35.7, 67.4) 111 (40, 114) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 4.4)
Scotland County 6 48.2 (27.4, 80.3) 112 (14, 114) 3
*
*
Holt County 6 45.6 (26.1, 77.7) 113 (21, 114) 3
*
*
Daviess County 6 42.5 (28.3, 62.9) 114 (52, 114) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.9, 5.0)
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2024 11:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top