Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 *** 93.0 (91.6, 94.4) N/A 3,485 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Adair County 6 *** 65.5 (46.8, 89.6) 93 (21, 108) 8 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.0, -0.4)
Andrew County 6 *** 86.6 (64.1, 115.2) 47 (3, 103) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 2.0)
Atchison County 6 *** 72.3 (40.7, 124.7) 85 (2, 108) 3 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.0, -0.7)
Audrain County 6 *** 109.0 (86.5, 136.1) 12 (1, 79) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.2)
Barry County 6 *** 74.9 (60.7, 91.8) 77 (22, 102) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.3)
Barton County 6 *** 95.5 (68.2, 131.7) 30 (1, 103) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
Bates County 6 *** 58.9 (39.8, 84.7) 99 (27, 108) 6 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.7, -2.0)
Benton County 6 *** 88.2 (70.4, 111.2) 45 (6, 96) 18 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.7)
Bollinger County 6 *** 47.4 (29.9, 73.4) 103 (51, 108) 5 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.7, -3.6)
Boone County 6 *** 95.9 (86.1, 106.5) 29 (9, 63) 76 stable stable trend 3.9 (-9.8, 19.8)
Buchanan County 6 *** 93.9 (82.0, 106.9) 33 (8, 76) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Butler County 6 *** 86.1 (71.4, 103.1) 50 (11, 94) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.6)
Caldwell County 6 *** 79.9 (52.0, 119.7) 62 (3, 108) 5 falling falling trend -10.1 (-14.8, -5.1)
Callaway County 6 *** 99.5 (83.2, 118.4) 20 (3, 78) 28 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -0.5)
Camden County 6 *** 76.7 (65.6, 89.8) 72 (27, 97) 37 stable stable trend 1.9 (-8.2, 13.2)
Cape Girardeau County 6 *** 116.3 (102.2, 131.7) 5 (1, 39) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Carroll County 6 *** 81.2 (53.2, 121.1) 61 (1, 108) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.4)
Carter County 6 *** 89.1 (51.1, 146.5) 41 (1, 108) 4
*
*
Cass County 6 *** 57.5 (49.2, 66.8) 100 (73, 107) 36 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.5, -2.1)
Cedar County 6 *** 75.0 (53.8, 103.4) 76 (8, 106) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.3, -0.6)
Chariton County 6 *** 99.3 (67.0, 145.1) 21 (1, 104) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.3)
Christian County 6 *** 86.4 (75.0, 99.2) 48 (16, 87) 43 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.4, -3.4)
Clark County 6 *** 110.0 (73.7, 161.2) 11 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.2, 4.2)
Clay County 6 *** 74.5 (67.8, 81.7) 79 (47, 93) 96 stable stable trend 0.1 (-13.2, 15.3)
Clinton County 6 *** 69.0 (51.0, 92.1) 89 (17, 108) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.8, -2.5)
Cole County 6 *** 110.8 (97.3, 125.6) 8 (2, 47) 52 rising rising trend 12.2 (0.9, 24.7)
Cooper County 6 *** 90.4 (66.6, 120.5) 39 (2, 102) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 2.2)
Crawford County 6 *** 72.9 (56.0, 94.1) 83 (19, 105) 13 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.2, -4.0)
Dade County 6 *** 67.7 (42.9, 105.6) 90 (8, 108) 5 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.9, -3.6)
Dallas County 6 *** 92.4 (69.6, 121.3) 37 (2, 101) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Daviess County 6 *** 82.9 (53.7, 124.8) 54 (2, 108) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 6 *** 74.5 (49.8, 107.8) 78 (5, 108) 6
*
*
Dent County 6 *** 62.3 (43.7, 87.3) 98 (26, 108) 8 stable stable trend -23.7 (-45.7, 7.4)
Douglas County 6 *** 79.2 (57.8, 108.0) 65 (7, 106) 9 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.2)
Dunklin County 6 *** 70.9 (55.0, 90.4) 87 (21, 106) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Franklin County 6 *** 97.9 (87.4, 109.5) 22 (7, 61) 67 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -1.9)
Gasconade County 6 *** 88.9 (66.5, 117.9) 42 (3, 103) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.0, -1.2)
Greene County 6 *** 96.8 (90.0, 104.0) 27 (13, 55) 155 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Grundy County 6 *** 84.0 (56.2, 122.6) 52 (2, 107) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 1.5)
Harrison County 6 *** 88.4 (58.5, 130.5) 44 (1, 107) 6
*
*
Henry County 6 *** 52.0 (37.8, 70.8) 102 (60, 108) 9 falling falling trend -7.0 (-9.7, -4.2)
Hickory County 6 *** 44.9 (28.3, 74.0) 107 (57, 108) 5 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.6, -3.6)
Holt County 6 *** 99.9 (57.0, 168.4) 18 (1, 108) 3 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.3, -1.0)
Howard County 6 *** 82.1 (54.7, 120.2) 57 (2, 107) 6 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.4, -0.5)
Howell County 6 *** 47.4 (36.4, 61.0) 104 (82, 108) 13 falling falling trend -7.1 (-11.1, -3.0)
Iron County 6 *** 92.6 (65.4, 129.7) 36 (1, 103) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 76.7 (72.8, 80.9) 71 (50, 85) 299 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.0, -3.2)
Jasper County 6 *** 90.9 (80.7, 102.1) 38 (13, 75) 59 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 97.8 (90.2, 105.9) 23 (11, 53) 133 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Johnson County 6 *** 64.2 (51.4, 79.2) 95 (47, 106) 18 falling falling trend -12.2 (-17.6, -6.4)
Laclede County 6 *** 107.6 (89.3, 128.8) 13 (2, 66) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.2)
Lafayette County 6 *** 76.9 (61.4, 95.6) 70 (18, 102) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.1)
Lawrence County 6 *** 83.7 (68.4, 101.7) 53 (10, 96) 21 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Lewis County 6 *** 62.5 (38.5, 97.6) 97 (13, 108) 4 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.0, -2.4)
Lincoln County 6 *** 82.5 (68.7, 98.4) 55 (14, 95) 27 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.2)
Linn County 6 *** 85.9 (60.5, 120.1) 51 (2, 105) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.5)
Livingston County 6 *** 95.1 (68.8, 129.2) 31 (2, 101) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.6)
Macon County 6 *** 81.3 (59.5, 109.7) 60 (5, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.0)
Madison County 6 *** 88.7 (62.5, 123.7) 43 (2, 105) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.9, -0.4)
Maries County 6 *** 54.5 (32.6, 88.6) 101 (24, 108) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.8, 2.4)
Marion County 6 *** 112.3 (91.4, 137.0) 7 (1, 62) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 2.0)
McDonald County 6 *** 78.7 (58.2, 104.4) 66 (5, 105) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.7)
Miller County 6 *** 90.2 (71.3, 113.1) 40 (4, 94) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.3)
Mississippi County 6 *** 159.2 (121.6, 204.9) 1 (1, 27) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.1)
Moniteau County 6 *** 79.7 (56.5, 109.7) 64 (5, 106) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.2, 2.8)
Monroe County 6 *** 70.1 (46.0, 105.8) 88 (7, 108) 5 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.7, -3.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 97.5 (70.1, 133.7) 25 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 77.1 (59.6, 99.4) 69 (11, 103) 14 stable stable trend 13.6 (-8.5, 41.0)
New Madrid County 6 *** 97.7 (73.1, 128.7) 24 (2, 97) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.2, 0.0)
Newton County 6 *** 79.8 (67.2, 94.3) 63 (19, 96) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.8)
Nodaway County 6 *** 75.8 (55.0, 102.4) 75 (8, 107) 9 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.0, 0.1)
Oregon County 6 *** 38.9 (22.9, 64.9) 108 (77, 108) 4
*
*
Osage County 6 *** 96.3 (69.2, 131.3) 28 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 1.9)
Ozark County 6 *** 66.2 (45.1, 98.3) 92 (17, 108) 7 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.9, 0.4)
Pemiscot County 6 *** 99.7 (72.7, 133.9) 19 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 6.6)
Perry County 6 *** 97.4 (74.1, 126.4) 26 (1, 98) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.5, 2.7)
Pettis County 6 *** 112.8 (94.7, 133.4) 6 (1, 58) 29 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -1.7)
Phelps County 6 *** 64.9 (51.8, 80.5) 94 (42, 106) 17 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.9, -3.0)
Pike County 6 *** 66.5 (47.7, 90.7) 91 (22, 108) 8 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.7, 1.0)
Platte County 6 *** 76.4 (66.3, 87.7) 74 (32, 96) 44 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -1.6)
Polk County 6 *** 78.2 (62.0, 97.8) 67 (13, 101) 16 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.1, -2.7)
Pulaski County 6 *** 110.6 (89.3, 135.2) 9 (1, 73) 20 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.4)
Ralls County 6 *** 72.4 (48.0, 107.2) 84 (5, 108) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.1, 4.0)
Randolph County 6 *** 73.8 (55.2, 96.8) 81 (13, 105) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.7)
Ray County 6 *** 77.2 (58.6, 100.4) 68 (11, 104) 12 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.2, 0.3)
Reynolds County 6 *** 93.6 (60.3, 143.0) 34 (1, 107) 5
*
*
Ripley County 6 *** 81.7 (58.3, 112.8) 58 (4, 106) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 1.0)
Saline County 6 *** 82.2 (63.2, 105.8) 56 (9, 103) 13 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.6, -1.8)
Schuyler County 6 *** 130.0 (80.3, 203.4) 2 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.4, 4.4)
Scott County 6 *** 126.2 (106.7, 148.5) 3 (1, 35) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Shannon County 6 *** 46.9 (27.1, 79.7) 106 (31, 108) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.0, 4.6)
Shelby County 6 *** 110.0 (70.0, 167.9) 10 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.8)
St. Charles County 6 *** 106.6 (100.5, 113.0) 14 (6, 33) 240 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.4)
St. Clair County 6 *** 47.2 (29.3, 76.2) 105 (51, 108) 4 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.9, -2.0)
St. Francois County 6 *** 92.8 (79.8, 107.4) 35 (8, 80) 38 stable stable trend 10.1 (-5.6, 28.5)
St. Louis City 6 *** 104.0 (96.9, 111.6) 15 (7, 40) 174 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.0)
St. Louis County 6 *** 120.8 (116.9, 124.8) 4 (2, 14) 756 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 *** 102.0 (78.6, 131.0) 17 (1, 92) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 5.3)
Stoddard County 6 *** 102.7 (83.7, 125.1) 16 (2, 78) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Stone County 6 *** 94.5 (79.9, 112.2) 32 (5, 83) 32 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.1, -1.2)
Taney County 6 *** 86.3 (73.8, 100.7) 49 (13, 89) 35 stable stable trend 2.5 (-5.6, 11.4)
Texas County 6 *** 64.0 (48.6, 83.2) 96 (36, 107) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.3, -2.0)
Vernon County 6 *** 74.4 (55.1, 99.0) 80 (9, 105) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.4)
Warren County 6 *** 73.4 (58.8, 91.0) 82 (26, 103) 18 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.0, -2.9)
Washington County 6 *** 76.4 (58.5, 98.5) 73 (12, 105) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 71.6 (51.1, 99.7) 86 (14, 107) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 1.5)
Webster County 6 *** 88.1 (71.4, 107.8) 46 (8, 93) 20 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Wright County 6 *** 81.5 (60.8, 107.9) 59 (4, 105) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -0.6)
Gentry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 3:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top