Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 96.0 (94.6, 97.4) N/A 3,733 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 4.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
St. Clair County 6 45.7 (27.8, 74.7) 110 (63, 110) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.3, -1.3)
Dent County 6 48.3 (32.8, 70.4) 109 (74, 110) 6 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.4, 0.3)
Maries County 6 49.9 (29.8, 81.9) 108 (46, 110) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.1, 2.3)
Hickory County 6 51.4 (34.0, 80.8) 107 (58, 110) 6 stable stable trend 15.0 (-15.1, 41.3)
Howell County 6 52.7 (41.3, 66.6) 106 (80, 110) 15 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.7, -1.9)
Bates County 6 55.9 (38.1, 80.2) 105 (49, 110) 7 falling falling trend -5.4 (-10.0, -1.7)
Henry County 6 57.2 (42.1, 76.9) 104 (57, 110) 10 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.4, -4.5)
Carroll County 6 58.5 (35.3, 94.1) 103 (23, 110) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.3, 1.4)
Shannon County 6 59.0 (36.8, 93.9) 102 (22, 110) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.2, 5.5)
Cass County 6 66.0 (57.3, 75.6) 101 (66, 106) 43 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.6)
Johnson County 6 66.5 (53.7, 81.6) 100 (48, 109) 19 falling falling trend -10.9 (-21.1, -6.8)
Pike County 6 67.7 (48.6, 92.4) 99 (28, 110) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.1, 1.7)
Sullivan County 6 67.7 (39.0, 113.3) 98 (7, 110) 3
*
*
Ray County 6 67.9 (50.9, 89.5) 97 (33, 110) 11 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.7, 0.5)
Adair County 6 68.4 (50.1, 91.8) 96 (29, 110) 9 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.2, -0.8)
Crawford County 6 69.6 (53.1, 90.3) 95 (34, 109) 13 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.2, -4.3)
Randolph County 6 69.7 (51.9, 91.9) 94 (26, 110) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.4)
DeKalb County 6 69.8 (46.0, 102.2) 93 (14, 110) 6
*
*
Texas County 6 70.2 (54.4, 89.8) 92 (30, 109) 14 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.7, -1.1)
Washington County 6 70.5 (53.7, 91.5) 91 (25, 109) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 2.0)
Lewis County 6 71.5 (46.0, 107.8) 90 (10, 110) 5 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.6, -2.4)
Dade County 6 71.9 (46.0, 111.1) 89 (7, 110) 5 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.4, -3.1)
Clay County 6 72.8 (66.4, 79.7) 88 (60, 99) 101 stable stable trend 1.9 (-11.1, 12.7)
Clinton County 6 73.0 (54.6, 96.3) 87 (22, 109) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.3, -1.2)
Gentry County 6 74.1 (42.9, 122.2) 86 (4, 110) 3
*
*
Cedar County 6 74.4 (53.3, 102.5) 85 (15, 110) 9 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.0, 0.5)
Vernon County 6 74.9 (55.4, 99.6) 84 (19, 109) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.5, 1.2)
Oregon County 6 74.9 (51.1, 108.6) 83 (8, 110) 7
*
*
Douglas County 6 75.7 (54.8, 104.1) 82 (13, 110) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.8)
Harrison County 6 76.5 (48.8, 116.9) 81 (6, 110) 5
*
*
Phelps County 6 77.0 (62.9, 93.6) 80 (29, 105) 21 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.3, -1.2)
Lawrence County 6 77.9 (63.1, 95.4) 79 (23, 104) 20 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Lafayette County 6 78.0 (62.5, 96.6) 78 (21, 104) 18 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.9, 0.9)
Ozark County 6 78.2 (55.2, 112.2) 77 (8, 109) 8 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.1, 0.3)
Grundy County 6 78.4 (52.2, 115.2) 76 (7, 110) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.4)
Camden County 6 78.4 (67.5, 91.4) 75 (36, 101) 40 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.9, 13.4)
McDonald County 6 78.7 (59.4, 102.7) 74 (14, 108) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.4, 5.0)
Polk County 6 78.8 (62.6, 98.3) 73 (20, 106) 17 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.8, -2.7)
Platte County 6 79.0 (69.0, 90.2) 72 (35, 99) 47 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -0.7)
Caldwell County 6 79.7 (52.0, 119.0) 71 (5, 110) 5 falling falling trend -9.2 (-17.7, -6.0)
Wayne County 6 80.2 (58.8, 109.2) 70 (11, 109) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.4)
Saline County 6 80.6 (61.9, 103.8) 69 (14, 106) 13 falling falling trend -10.3 (-34.0, -6.7)
Lincoln County 6 81.1 (68.2, 96.0) 68 (26, 101) 29 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.6, -3.1)
Nodaway County 6 81.4 (59.8, 108.8) 67 (11, 109) 10 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.7, 0.4)
Monroe County 6 81.4 (55.4, 118.8) 66 (6, 110) 6 stable stable trend 18.9 (-0.3, 36.2)
Bollinger County 6 81.6 (58.1, 113.4) 65 (7, 109) 8 stable stable trend 22.2 (-0.9, 42.1)
Warren County 6 81.7 (66.4, 99.7) 64 (21, 104) 21 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.6, -2.2)
Daviess County 6 81.8 (52.3, 124.3) 63 (3, 110) 5
*
*
Jackson County 6 81.9 (77.9, 86.1) 62 (49, 82) 330 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Benton County 6 82.3 (65.8, 103.8) 61 (18, 104) 19 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -1.0)
Macon County 6 83.4 (61.7, 111.5) 60 (8, 108) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 2.0)
Moniteau County 6 83.6 (60.1, 113.9) 59 (7, 109) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.2, 4.0)
Morgan County 6 83.8 (65.6, 106.7) 58 (11, 106) 15 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.0, -0.7)
Ralls County 6 83.9 (58.2, 119.6) 57 (4, 109) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.9, 5.9)
Livingston County 6 85.1 (60.7, 117.3) 56 (6, 109) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.5)
New Madrid County 6 85.7 (62.8, 115.0) 55 (7, 108) 10 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.3, 0.4)
Webster County 6 87.0 (70.9, 105.9) 54 (13, 100) 21 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
Carter County 6 87.4 (49.2, 145.7) 53 (1, 110) 3
*
*
Ripley County 6 87.5 (63.1, 119.5) 52 (6, 108) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.2)
Dallas County 6 87.9 (66.5, 115.3) 51 (7, 105) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Taney County 6 89.4 (77.0, 103.6) 50 (19, 89) 38 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.7, 14.3)
Wright County 6 89.8 (68.0, 117.2) 49 (6, 104) 12 stable stable trend -3.4 (-6.9, 0.0)
Iron County 6 90.4 (63.8, 126.7) 48 (3, 108) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.8, 4.2)
Montgomery County 6 91.1 (63.9, 127.4) 47 (3, 108) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 2.1)
Dunklin County 6 92.1 (73.7, 114.1) 46 (7, 100) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Pettis County 6 92.2 (76.2, 110.7) 45 (11, 94) 24 falling falling trend -4.3 (-9.8, -2.5)
Linn County 6 93.2 (66.8, 128.4) 44 (2, 106) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 0.9)
Buchanan County 6 94.0 (82.3, 107.0) 43 (13, 78) 49 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Barry County 6 94.2 (78.4, 112.7) 42 (7, 92) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.6)
Miller County 6 95.1 (75.7, 118.4) 41 (6, 97) 17 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.2, 21.0)
Howard County 6 96.0 (66.2, 136.3) 40 (1, 108) 7 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.1, 0.9)
Jefferson County 6 96.3 (89.0, 104.1) 39 (20, 63) 140 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Laclede County 6 96.7 (79.8, 116.5) 38 (6, 91) 24 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -0.9)
Franklin County 6 96.7 (86.6, 107.9) 37 (14, 72) 69 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -2.4)
Callaway County 6 97.6 (82.1, 115.5) 36 (8, 83) 30 falling falling trend -5.9 (-17.3, -3.1)
St. Louis City 6 98.1 (91.3, 105.3) 35 (19, 58) 169 stable stable trend -4.7 (-18.9, 0.1)
Gasconade County 6 99.6 (75.9, 130.0) 34 (3, 98) 12 stable stable trend 12.7 (-0.9, 26.2)
St. Charles County 6 99.9 (94.2, 105.9) 33 (19, 53) 241 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -1.9)
Stone County 6 101.0 (86.5, 118.4) 32 (6, 74) 37 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.0)
Christian County 6 101.0 (89.0, 114.2) 31 (9, 68) 53 stable stable trend 9.3 (0.0, 18.4)
Boone County 6 101.9 (92.2, 112.3) 30 (11, 61) 87 stable stable trend 4.3 (-2.7, 13.8)
Chariton County 6 103.3 (70.1, 150.3) 29 (1, 107) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.8, 4.0)
Butler County 6 104.8 (88.5, 123.5) 28 (5, 73) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.4)
Barton County 6 105.0 (76.4, 142.5) 27 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.8)
Cooper County 6 105.3 (79.9, 136.7) 26 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 3.1)
Jasper County 6 105.7 (94.8, 117.6) 25 (8, 57) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.7)
Holt County 6 105.9 (64.8, 171.3) 24 (1, 109) 4 stable stable trend 8.0 (-3.1, 47.3)
Marion County 6 106.1 (85.8, 130.2) 23 (2, 83) 20 stable stable trend -2.2 (-20.2, 4.7)
Clark County 6 106.9 (71.7, 156.8) 22 (1, 107) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.6, 5.6)
Stoddard County 6 108.0 (88.5, 131.0) 21 (3, 78) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.1)
Newton County 6 109.1 (94.7, 125.3) 20 (4, 62) 43 rising rising trend 21.1 (4.0, 37.0)
Greene County 6 109.4 (102.3, 116.9) 19 (9, 41) 183 stable stable trend 6.8 (-2.7, 13.8)
Andrew County 6 110.3 (85.3, 141.3) 18 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.5)
St. Francois County 6 110.6 (96.6, 126.3) 17 (4, 57) 46 rising rising trend 13.2 (1.0, 21.8)
Audrain County 6 110.9 (88.4, 138.0) 16 (1, 80) 18 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.5)
Pemiscot County 6 112.4 (83.6, 148.5) 15 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.5, 7.3)
Madison County 6 115.5 (84.7, 155.1) 14 (1, 93) 10 stable stable trend 20.5 (-0.3, 38.9)
St. Louis County 6 115.6 (111.8, 119.5) 13 (7, 25) 742 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Pulaski County 6 119.7 (98.2, 144.4) 12 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 1.1)
Perry County 6 120.3 (94.9, 151.0) 11 (1, 78) 16 stable stable trend 12.1 (-1.1, 38.9)
Osage County 6 120.9 (90.7, 158.8) 10 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 0.9)
Cole County 6 123.6 (109.9, 138.7) 9 (2, 32) 61 rising rising trend 10.3 (3.1, 24.6)
Putnam County 6 128.6 (85.3, 192.6) 8 (1, 98) 6
*
*
Ste. Genevieve County 6 128.9 (102.2, 161.2) 7 (1, 58) 17 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 6.3)
Reynolds County 6 130.1 (90.1, 186.0) 6 (1, 94) 7
*
*
Shelby County 6 130.5 (85.0, 194.4) 5 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.9, 1.9)
Mississippi County 6 131.6 (98.4, 173.0) 4 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.9)
Schuyler County 6 136.4 (85.1, 211.4) 3 (1, 104) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.2, 7.1)
Scott County 6 139.5 (119.1, 162.6) 2 (1, 25) 35 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.0)
Cape Girardeau County 6 143.8 (128.3, 160.7) 1 (1, 15) 66 rising rising trend 15.3 (4.1, 24.2)
Atchison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 10:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atchison, Knox, Mercer, Scotland, Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top