Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 18.8 (18.4, 19.3) N/A 1,496 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.9 (18.8, 19.0) N/A 74,016 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.5)
Chariton County 6 31.7 (19.5, 50.7) 1 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Iron County 6 31.5 (20.3, 47.8) 2 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Mississippi County 6 29.2 (18.9, 43.6) 3 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.4, 8.7)
Perry County 6 27.4 (18.9, 38.7) 4 (1, 78) 7 rising rising trend 15.1 (0.6, 56.5)
Moniteau County 6 26.0 (16.7, 38.7) 5 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Saline County 6 25.8 (18.3, 35.5) 6 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.3, 5.2)
Monroe County 6 25.8 (15.7, 41.8) 7 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Clinton County 6 25.7 (17.7, 36.3) 8 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Scott County 6 25.6 (19.8, 32.6) 9 (1, 65) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.7, 19.3)
St. Francois County 6 25.5 (20.9, 31.0) 10 (1, 56) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.4)
Cape Girardeau County 6 25.4 (21.0, 30.4) 11 (1, 54) 25 rising rising trend 17.8 (3.7, 38.6)
Marion County 6 25.0 (18.4, 33.5) 12 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend -18.8 (-40.3, 7.8)
Osage County 6 24.8 (15.6, 38.1) 13 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Pettis County 6 24.8 (19.0, 31.9) 14 (1, 72) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.7)
Buchanan County 6 24.4 (20.3, 29.0) 15 (2, 58) 27 rising rising trend 6.3 (2.6, 19.4)
Stoddard County 6 24.0 (17.9, 31.9) 16 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.1, 7.5)
Webster County 6 23.9 (18.0, 31.2) 17 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.8)
Harrison County 6 23.8 (13.8, 40.0) 18 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Carroll County 6 23.0 (13.2, 38.7) 19 (1, 85) 3
*
*
New Madrid County 6 22.9 (15.2, 33.6) 20 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.3)
Howard County 6 22.8 (12.7, 38.6) 21 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Callaway County 6 22.8 (17.5, 29.3) 22 (2, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.7)
Lawrence County 6 22.7 (17.3, 29.5) 23 (2, 78) 12 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.5)
Taney County 6 22.6 (18.2, 27.9) 24 (3, 68) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Nodaway County 6 22.5 (14.5, 33.5) 25 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Franklin County 6 22.0 (18.7, 25.9) 26 (6, 64) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.3)
Barry County 6 21.8 (16.5, 28.6) 27 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 7.0)
Morgan County 6 21.8 (15.4, 30.7) 28 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 4.7)
Lewis County 6 21.6 (12.3, 36.4) 29 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Pulaski County 6 21.4 (15.3, 28.9) 30 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 4.9)
Linn County 6 21.3 (12.3, 35.1) 31 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.8, 9.8)
Audrain County 6 21.3 (14.9, 29.7) 32 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.6)
Camden County 6 21.1 (17.0, 26.3) 33 (6, 75) 20 stable stable trend -3.4 (-26.6, 6.4)
Butler County 6 21.0 (16.1, 27.2) 34 (4, 80) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.4, 4.8)
Dallas County 6 20.8 (13.2, 31.8) 35 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.3)
Clay County 6 20.8 (18.5, 23.4) 36 (13, 63) 59 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.8)
Jefferson County 6 20.6 (18.2, 23.3) 37 (14, 66) 55 falling falling trend -7.5 (-16.0, -0.7)
Boone County 6 20.6 (17.6, 24.0) 38 (11, 70) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.6)
Bollinger County 6 20.5 (12.2, 33.1) 39 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 20.3 (13.8, 29.0) 40 (2, 85) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.5)
Miller County 6 20.2 (14.1, 28.3) 41 (2, 84) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.2)
Jasper County 6 20.2 (17.0, 23.7) 42 (12, 74) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.9)
St. Charles County 6 20.1 (18.3, 22.1) 43 (20, 63) 95 falling falling trend -10.3 (-16.8, -2.1)
Gasconade County 6 20.1 (13.2, 30.3) 44 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.6, 2.4)
Madison County 6 19.7 (11.6, 32.2) 45 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.0, 4.0)
Warren County 6 19.7 (14.4, 26.5) 46 (5, 84) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.2)
McDonald County 6 19.6 (13.1, 28.5) 47 (2, 85) 6
*
*
DeKalb County 6 19.5 (11.1, 32.7) 48 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 19.3 (11.8, 30.0) 49 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Stone County 6 19.1 (14.6, 25.2) 50 (8, 83) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.8)
Cole County 6 19.0 (15.3, 23.5) 51 (11, 80) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.8)
Christian County 6 19.0 (15.3, 23.3) 52 (13, 81) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.5, 2.5)
Randolph County 6 18.9 (12.8, 27.2) 53 (3, 85) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.4, 2.6)
Benton County 6 18.8 (13.3, 27.1) 54 (5, 85) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 2.6)
Greene County 6 18.7 (16.7, 20.8) 55 (26, 73) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 18.6 (12.1, 28.0) 56 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.4)
Henry County 6 18.6 (12.4, 27.1) 57 (3, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.4, 6.8)
Montgomery County 6 18.5 (10.7, 31.0) 58 (2, 85) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.0, 3.7)
Phelps County 6 18.3 (13.5, 24.5) 59 (8, 84) 10 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.3, 20.0)
Pike County 6 18.2 (11.4, 28.0) 60 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 18.0 (11.4, 27.9) 61 (3, 85) 5
*
*
Lafayette County 6 18.0 (12.9, 24.6) 62 (8, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.5)
Wright County 6 17.9 (11.2, 27.6) 63 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.0, 5.9)
Ray County 6 17.7 (12.0, 25.6) 64 (5, 85) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.7, 4.5)
St. Louis County 6 17.3 (16.3, 18.3) 65 (45, 73) 240 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.1, -0.2)
Dent County 6 17.2 (10.7, 27.0) 66 (4, 85) 4
*
*
Platte County 6 17.0 (13.7, 20.7) 67 (25, 84) 20 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.3)
Newton County 6 16.6 (12.9, 21.3) 68 (19, 84) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 6.1)
Crawford County 6 16.3 (10.9, 24.0) 69 (9, 85) 6 falling falling trend -6.1 (-18.0, -2.1)
Jackson County 6 16.2 (15.0, 17.5) 70 (51, 79) 135 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Johnson County 6 16.1 (11.5, 21.9) 71 (15, 85) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.8)
Polk County 6 16.0 (11.0, 22.8) 72 (13, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.8)
Cass County 6 16.0 (13.2, 19.4) 73 (34, 84) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 1.2)
Lincoln County 6 15.7 (11.6, 20.9) 74 (22, 85) 10 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.1, -1.2)
Cedar County 6 15.5 (9.4, 25.1) 75 (8, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.8, 5.2)
Livingston County 6 15.3 (9.0, 25.2) 76 (5, 85) 4
*
*
Andrew County 6 15.2 (9.0, 24.6) 77 (6, 85) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6 15.2 (9.0, 25.5) 78 (7, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 4.2)
Texas County 6 15.2 (10.1, 22.3) 79 (16, 85) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 5.0)
Laclede County 6 14.8 (10.3, 20.8) 80 (20, 85) 7 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.8, 0.0)
St. Louis City 6 14.8 (13.0, 16.8) 81 (53, 84) 50 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Dunklin County 6 14.6 (9.9, 21.1) 82 (21, 85) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.2, 3.4)
Hickory County 6 14.2 (8.1, 26.9) 83 (8, 85) 3 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.0, 0.1)
Howell County 6 13.2 (9.3, 18.3) 84 (39, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 4.2)
Vernon County 6 10.6 (5.9, 17.9) 85 (38, 85) 3 stable stable trend -14.4 (-38.8, 1.4)
Adair County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atchison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2024 5:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adair, Atchison, Barton, Bates, Caldwell, Carter, Clark, Cooper, Dade, Daviess, Douglas, Gentry, Grundy, Holt, Knox, Maries, Mercer, Oregon, Ozark, Putnam, Ralls, Reynolds, Ripley, Schuyler, Scotland, Shannon, Shelby, St. Clair, Sullivan, Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top