Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 N/A 19.8 (19.4, 20.3) N/A 1,504 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Harrison County 6 Rural 36.6 (19.9, 61.4) 1 (1, 81) 3
*
*
Chariton County 6 Rural 33.6 (19.1, 56.0) 2 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural 32.0 (25.0, 40.5) 3 (1, 41) 15 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.1, 11.6)
Randolph County 6 Rural 29.3 (21.2, 39.6) 4 (1, 68) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.5, 8.5)
Dunklin County 6 Rural 29.2 (21.5, 38.9) 5 (1, 65) 10 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.6, 7.8)
Cooper County 6 Urban 28.3 (18.7, 41.2) 6 (1, 77) 6 rising rising trend 35.1 (10.3, 63.1)
Monroe County 6 Rural 28.0 (14.9, 48.5) 7 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Stoddard County 6 Rural 27.8 (20.3, 37.4) 8 (1, 71) 10 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 7.9)
Marion County 6 Rural 26.8 (19.2, 36.4) 9 (1, 74) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.5, 8.4)
Henry County 6 Rural 26.1 (18.1, 36.8) 10 (1, 78) 8 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 8.1)
Perry County 6 Rural 26.1 (17.7, 37.4) 11 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.9, 6.9)
Callaway County 6 Urban 25.9 (20.0, 33.0) 12 (2, 68) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 5.0)
Iron County 6 Rural 25.8 (14.8, 42.9) 13 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Mississippi County 6 Rural 25.3 (15.2, 39.8) 14 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -6.1 (-46.0, 1.8)
Andrew County 6 Urban 25.2 (16.5, 37.0) 15 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.9, 4.8)
Lewis County 6 Rural 24.9 (13.5, 42.5) 16 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Laclede County 6 Rural 24.8 (18.3, 32.9) 17 (1, 75) 11 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.2, 7.8)
Washington County 6 Rural 24.8 (17.1, 34.8) 18 (1, 78) 7
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural 24.7 (16.1, 36.4) 19 (1, 80) 6 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.1, 10.5)
Grundy County 6 Rural 24.4 (13.7, 40.9) 20 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Pulaski County 6 Rural 24.2 (17.9, 31.9) 21 (2, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.4)
Warren County 6 Urban 24.0 (17.7, 32.0) 22 (2, 76) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.7, 8.6)
Jasper County 6 Urban 24.0 (20.4, 28.1) 23 (6, 57) 33 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.3, 11.5)
New Madrid County 6 Rural 24.0 (15.7, 35.5) 24 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.3, 7.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 23.9 (21.3, 26.8) 25 (8, 49) 65 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.5, 4.5)
Pettis County 6 Rural 23.6 (17.9, 30.5) 26 (3, 74) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.7)
Gasconade County 6 Rural 22.7 (15.1, 33.7) 27 (2, 81) 6
*
*
Ripley County 6 Rural 22.7 (13.0, 37.5) 28 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Buchanan County 6 Urban 22.7 (18.6, 27.4) 29 (7, 70) 23 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.2)
Butler County 6 Rural 22.6 (16.9, 29.7) 30 (3, 78) 12 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 8.3)
Stone County 6 Rural 22.4 (15.9, 30.9) 31 (3, 80) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 22.3 (15.3, 31.8) 32 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.6, 7.1)
Madison County 6 Rural 22.1 (12.9, 36.0) 33 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -11.3 (-52.4, 2.6)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 22.0 (11.9, 37.5) 34 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend -3.2 (-19.0, 2.2)
Moniteau County 6 Urban 21.9 (13.0, 34.7) 35 (1, 82) 4
*
*
St. Francois County 6 Rural 21.8 (17.3, 27.1) 36 (7, 74) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1)
Cass County 6 Urban 21.7 (18.2, 25.6) 37 (10, 70) 29 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 4.8)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 21.4 (16.5, 27.2) 38 (6, 77) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 5.3)
Nodaway County 6 Rural 21.3 (13.5, 32.1) 39 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.0, 6.5)
Clay County 6 Urban 21.2 (18.8, 23.8) 40 (16, 64) 60 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.5)
Macon County 6 Rural 20.7 (12.9, 32.1) 41 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.8, 6.0)
Cedar County 6 Rural 20.5 (13.0, 31.7) 42 (2, 82) 5
*
*
Barton County 6 Rural 20.4 (11.2, 34.6) 43 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 Rural 20.2 (12.4, 31.6) 44 (2, 82) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6 Urban 20.2 (16.9, 24.0) 45 (15, 74) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.6)
St. Charles County 6 Urban 20.2 (18.4, 22.1) 46 (25, 65) 97 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Ray County 6 Urban 20.1 (13.5, 29.0) 47 (3, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.9, 3.2)
Miller County 6 Rural 20.1 (13.3, 29.2) 48 (3, 82) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.1)
St. Louis City 6 Urban 20.0 (17.8, 22.3) 49 (24, 68) 68 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Johnson County 6 Rural 19.9 (14.7, 26.3) 50 (8, 81) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 6.1)
Lafayette County 6 Urban 19.8 (14.3, 26.8) 51 (8, 81) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.1, 7.7)
Boone County 6 Urban 19.5 (16.6, 22.7) 52 (19, 75) 34 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 19.4 (13.3, 27.5) 53 (5, 82) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.1, 0.5)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 Rural 19.3 (12.1, 29.8) 54 (3, 82) 5
*
*
Saline County 6 Rural 19.1 (12.7, 27.9) 55 (5, 82) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.6)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 19.1 (18.0, 20.2) 56 (36, 66) 251 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Phelps County 6 Rural 19.1 (14.0, 25.4) 57 (10, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.7)
Audrain County 6 Rural 18.8 (12.8, 27.0) 58 (6, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.7, 3.1)
McDonald County 6 Rural 18.7 (12.0, 28.0) 59 (5, 82) 5
*
*
Howell County 6 Rural 18.6 (13.5, 25.1) 60 (9, 82) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.1, 5.9)
Platte County 6 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 21.9) 61 (22, 79) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.5)
Wright County 6 Rural 18.1 (10.7, 28.7) 62 (4, 82) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Urban 18.1 (16.7, 19.5) 63 (41, 73) 147 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Cape Girardeau County 6 Urban 17.9 (14.1, 22.4) 64 (20, 80) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-12.7, 0.6)
Texas County 6 Rural 17.8 (12.1, 25.7) 65 (9, 82) 7
*
*
Newton County 6 Urban 17.8 (13.6, 22.9) 66 (17, 81) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.5, 8.7)
Camden County 6 Rural 17.8 (13.4, 23.4) 67 (14, 81) 14 stable stable trend -19.9 (-45.0, 7.2)
Clinton County 6 Urban 17.3 (11.0, 26.3) 68 (7, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.2, 3.9)
Cole County 6 Urban 17.3 (13.7, 21.6) 69 (24, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Adair County 6 Rural 17.0 (10.7, 26.0) 70 (6, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.3)
Vernon County 6 Rural 17.0 (10.6, 26.1) 71 (6, 82) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.5)
Christian County 6 Urban 16.9 (13.5, 21.0) 72 (27, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.7)
Linn County 6 Rural 16.7 (9.4, 28.6) 73 (5, 82) 3 stable stable trend -5.0 (-43.3, 1.5)
Webster County 6 Urban 16.4 (11.6, 22.6) 74 (16, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 3.0)
Greene County 6 Urban 15.8 (14.0, 17.9) 75 (50, 80) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Taney County 6 Rural 15.8 (11.8, 20.8) 76 (25, 82) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.0)
Dent County 6 Rural 15.8 (8.8, 26.6) 77 (7, 82) 3 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 7.4)
Barry County 6 Rural 15.5 (10.9, 21.7) 78 (23, 82) 8 stable stable trend 4.4 (0.0, 10.0)
Dallas County 6 Urban 14.7 (8.8, 23.7) 79 (13, 82) 4
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural 14.4 (8.5, 23.2) 80 (14, 82) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 0.9)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 12.3 (8.2, 17.9) 81 (43, 82) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.1, 7.0)
Benton County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.4, 18.5) 82 (44, 82) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.4, 4.7)
Atchison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 4:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top