Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 19.4 (18.9, 19.9) N/A 1,451 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 3.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Livingston County 6 13.9 (7.9, 23.5) 80 (12, 83) 3
*
*
McDonald County 6 11.7 (6.6, 19.4) 83 (28, 83) 3
*
*
Montgomery County 6 19.9 (10.9, 34.1) 45 (1, 83) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.7, 8.3)
Ralls County 6 22.0 (12.1, 37.5) 28 (1, 83) 3
*
*
St. Clair County 6 19.0 (10.6, 33.4) 53 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Lewis County 6 25.7 (14.6, 42.7) 10 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 16.0 (9.2, 26.3) 75 (5, 83) 3
*
*
Dent County 6 16.6 (9.4, 27.6) 71 (5, 83) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.1)
Mississippi County 6 22.8 (13.4, 36.7) 21 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.5, 9.6)
Moniteau County 6 21.1 (12.4, 33.6) 36 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Ripley County 6 17.9 (10.4, 29.3) 63 (3, 83) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6 17.6 (10.0, 29.4) 64 (2, 83) 4
*
*
Bates County 6 18.1 (10.5, 29.2) 58 (2, 83) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.4)
Madison County 6 23.7 (13.9, 38.2) 16 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.4, 11.4)
Grundy County 6 27.8 (16.7, 44.2) 6 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Linn County 6 21.3 (12.7, 34.4) 34 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 5.9)
Macon County 6 20.9 (12.5, 33.0) 39 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.3)
Nodaway County 6 18.3 (11.2, 28.5) 57 (3, 83) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.0)
Benton County 6 14.4 (8.3, 23.9) 79 (10, 83) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 3.7)
Pike County 6 20.1 (12.4, 31.1) 43 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.5, 9.4)
Dallas County 6 17.9 (11.0, 27.9) 62 (4, 83) 5
*
*
Barton County 6 29.0 (18.2, 44.5) 4 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Cooper County 6 20.1 (12.8, 30.6) 42 (2, 83) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.5, 4.7)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 21.4 (13.3, 32.9) 32 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Andrew County 6 22.9 (14.4, 34.7) 20 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.1)
Cedar County 6 20.9 (13.5, 32.1) 38 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Morgan County 6 14.9 (9.4, 23.1) 78 (12, 83) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.9)
Polk County 6 13.1 (8.3, 19.8) 81 (22, 83) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.5)
Saline County 6 16.8 (10.8, 25.1) 69 (9, 83) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.1, 6.9)
Wright County 6 23.0 (14.6, 34.6) 19 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.1)
Adair County 6 19.7 (12.7, 29.3) 47 (2, 83) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.5)
Audrain County 6 15.4 (10.1, 22.8) 77 (13, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 2.5)
Perry County 6 21.3 (13.7, 31.8) 35 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.3, 6.2)
Ray County 6 16.8 (10.9, 25.0) 68 (8, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.5)
Miller County 6 17.9 (11.7, 26.3) 61 (6, 83) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.4)
Clinton County 6 22.3 (14.9, 32.4) 25 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.7)
New Madrid County 6 24.5 (16.4, 35.7) 13 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 6.5)
Gasconade County 6 26.9 (17.7, 39.9) 7 (1, 79) 6
*
*
Vernon County 6 22.2 (14.8, 32.3) 27 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.3, 7.4)
Barry County 6 12.3 (8.3, 17.8) 82 (41, 83) 6 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.7, 8.4)
Washington County 6 23.2 (16.0, 32.7) 18 (1, 80) 7
*
*
Crawford County 6 25.1 (17.3, 35.3) 12 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 6.7)
Henry County 6 22.8 (15.8, 32.3) 23 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 6.4)
Webster County 6 16.3 (11.4, 22.6) 74 (15, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.7)
Texas County 6 21.0 (14.7, 29.4) 37 (2, 82) 8
*
*
Lawrence County 6 15.9 (11.2, 22.1) 76 (16, 83) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.6, 7.1)
Stone County 6 16.4 (10.9, 23.9) 73 (11, 83) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.3)
Marion County 6 25.2 (17.9, 34.6) 11 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.6, 8.2)
Randolph County 6 29.2 (21.1, 39.6) 3 (1, 65) 9 rising rising trend 21.3 (8.7, 35.4)
Lafayette County 6 21.8 (15.9, 29.4) 29 (3, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.8)
Warren County 6 21.6 (15.8, 29.1) 30 (2, 79) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.1, 5.8)
Phelps County 6 18.7 (13.8, 24.9) 56 (8, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.5)
Dunklin County 6 26.7 (19.6, 35.6) 8 (1, 73) 10 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.8, 8.4)
Howell County 6 20.5 (15.1, 27.3) 40 (4, 80) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.1)
Pettis County 6 19.9 (14.7, 26.4) 46 (7, 81) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.0)
Johnson County 6 20.2 (15.1, 26.6) 41 (6, 80) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 4.6)
Laclede County 6 26.6 (19.8, 35.1) 9 (1, 69) 11 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.8, 8.0)
Pulaski County 6 28.0 (21.0, 36.4) 5 (1, 63) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.1)
Stoddard County 6 34.5 (26.0, 44.9) 1 (1, 32) 12 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.5, 8.4)
Butler County 6 23.7 (18.0, 30.8) 17 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 3.5 (0.0, 7.1)
Callaway County 6 23.9 (18.1, 31.1) 15 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.1)
Taney County 6 17.1 (12.8, 22.3) 67 (15, 82) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.6)
Camden County 6 18.8 (14.2, 24.7) 55 (10, 81) 14 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 5.3)
Lincoln County 6 22.5 (17.4, 28.6) 24 (3, 75) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 4.5)
Newton County 6 20.0 (15.6, 25.4) 44 (8, 78) 15 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.1, 7.8)
Scott County 6 31.7 (24.6, 40.2) 2 (1, 43) 15 rising rising trend 7.0 (3.1, 11.2)
St. Francois County 6 19.1 (14.9, 24.1) 51 (11, 80) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5)
Christian County 6 17.2 (13.6, 21.4) 66 (20, 81) 17 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.6, 26.0)
Cape Girardeau County 6 19.3 (15.4, 24.0) 49 (12, 78) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.1)
Cole County 6 19.6 (15.8, 24.2) 48 (9, 77) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Platte County 6 17.4 (14.1, 21.4) 65 (22, 81) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Buchanan County 6 22.8 (18.8, 27.5) 22 (5, 66) 24 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.3)
Franklin County 6 17.9 (14.7, 21.5) 60 (22, 79) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.0)
Cass County 6 21.4 (17.9, 25.5) 31 (8, 70) 27 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.7)
Boone County 6 16.7 (14.0, 19.8) 70 (30, 81) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Jasper County 6 24.1 (20.4, 28.2) 14 (4, 56) 32 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 5.6)
Greene County 6 16.5 (14.6, 18.6) 72 (40, 79) 56 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Jefferson County 6 21.3 (18.8, 24.0) 33 (12, 61) 58 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 4.0)
Clay County 6 22.2 (19.7, 25.0) 26 (11, 56) 60 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.9)
St. Louis City 6 19.0 (16.9, 21.3) 52 (24, 70) 65 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
St. Charles County 6 19.3 (17.5, 21.2) 50 (26, 68) 90 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Jackson County 6 18.0 (16.6, 19.4) 59 (37, 71) 142 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
St. Louis County 6 18.9 (17.8, 20.0) 54 (34, 66) 244 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 1.9)
Atchison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chariton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2022 7:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atchison, Bollinger, Caldwell, Carroll, Carter, Chariton, Clark, Dade, Daviess, DeKalb, Douglas, Gentry, Harrison, Hickory, Holt, Howard, Iron, Knox, Maries, Mercer, Monroe, Oregon, Osage, Ozark, Putnam, Reynolds, Schuyler, Scotland, Shannon, Shelby, Sullivan, Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top