Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6,10 *** 103.5 (102.0, 105.0) 3,792 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 102.8 (102.6, 103.0) 204,831 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
St. Louis County 6,10 *** 108.2 (104.5, 112.0) 650 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.3, 5.2)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 103.2 (98.8, 107.6) 438 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.5, 7.4)
St. Charles County 6,10 *** 107.4 (101.6, 113.4) 261 stable stable trend -3.3 (-10.1, 4.0)
St. Louis City 6,10 *** 104.1 (97.8, 110.7) 211 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.0)
Greene County 6,10 *** 96.4 (89.8, 103.4) 161 stable stable trend 2.5 (-6.7, 12.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 108.5 (101.0, 116.4) 156 stable stable trend 1.1 (-8.4, 11.6)
Clay County 6,10 *** 102.5 (95.4, 109.9) 156 stable stable trend 5.5 (-7.5, 20.4)
Boone County 6,10 *** 106.9 (97.8, 116.7) 106 stable stable trend 1.6 (-5.1, 8.7)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 119.6 (107.8, 132.5) 75 stable stable trend 1.1 (-18.8, 25.8)
Cass County 6,10 *** 112.5 (101.0, 125.0) 70 stable stable trend -2.1 (-11.5, 8.1)
Jasper County 6,10 *** 94.6 (84.7, 105.3) 67 stable stable trend 5.4 (-6.1, 18.2)
Buchanan County 6,10 *** 116.7 (104.1, 130.4) 63 stable stable trend -4.7 (-19.6, 13.0)
Platte County 6,10 *** 97.7 (87.0, 109.4) 61 stable stable trend 4.8 (-3.4, 13.6)
St. Francois County 6,10 *** 118.5 (104.3, 134.1) 51 stable stable trend -11.9 (-28.3, 8.2)
Cole County 6,10 *** 99.6 (87.4, 112.9) 49 stable stable trend 2.3 (-5.5, 10.7)
Christian County 6,10 *** 94.7 (83.1, 107.4) 49 stable stable trend 6.1 (-8.4, 22.9)
Cape Girardeau County 6,10 *** 97.4 (84.7, 111.4) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-19.9, 23.1)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 95.7 (81.6, 111.6) 33 stable stable trend -4.7 (-29.5, 29.0)
Taney County 6,10 *** 99.5 (84.0, 116.9) 30 stable stable trend 5.6 (-13.8, 29.4)
Johnson County 6,10 *** 100.5 (84.5, 118.6) 29 stable stable trend -1.4 (-12.0, 10.5)
Scott County 6,10 *** 124.2 (104.7, 146.2) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-12.7, 14.0)
Newton County 6,10 *** 82.6 (69.5, 97.4) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-24.8, 36.5)
Pulaski County 6,10 *** 89.3 (74.5, 106.1) 28 falling falling trend -13.2 (-19.7, -6.1)
Callaway County 6,10 *** 100.3 (84.1, 118.7) 27 stable stable trend 5.3 (-9.1, 21.9)
Phelps County 6,10 *** 99.4 (82.5, 118.6) 26 stable stable trend -5.7 (-22.5, 14.7)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 112.9 (93.8, 134.7) 25 stable stable trend -6.4 (-31.5, 28.0)
Pettis County 6,10 *** 96.6 (79.8, 115.9) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-23.4, 31.9)
Webster County 6,10 *** 99.9 (82.4, 119.9) 23 stable stable trend 3.7 (-9.9, 19.3)
Warren County 6,10 *** 115.1 (94.6, 138.7) 22 stable stable trend -5.5 (-19.0, 10.2)
Butler County 6,10 *** 88.4 (72.7, 106.5) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-27.1, 37.6)
Marion County 6,10 *** 125.6 (102.8, 151.9) 21 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.1, 14.8)
Howell County 6,10 *** 90.4 (73.8, 109.6) 21 stable stable trend -11.5 (-34.1, 18.7)
Lafayette County 6,10 *** 99.9 (81.0, 121.7) 20 stable stable trend 9.5 (-12.6, 37.1)
Laclede County 6,10 *** 89.4 (72.4, 109.1) 19 stable stable trend 6.1 (-1.1, 13.8)
Camden County 6,10 *** 84.7 (68.4, 103.8) 19 stable stable trend 5.4 (-15.2, 31.1)
Stoddard County 6,10 *** 105.5 (85.1, 129.3) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-29.4, 44.5)
Crawford County 6,10 *** 128.9 (103.8, 158.3) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-24.4, 31.7)
Washington County 6,10 *** 113.7 (91.5, 139.8) 18 stable stable trend 3.5 (-16.9, 29.0)
Audrain County 6,10 *** 117.3 (94.1, 144.3) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-9.5, 13.6)
Dunklin County 6,10 *** 97.8 (78.5, 120.4) 18 stable stable trend -7.8 (-25.1, 13.6)
Ray County 6,10 *** 120.3 (95.7, 149.2) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-11.2, 17.4)
Miller County 6,10 *** 110.9 (88.2, 137.7) 17 stable stable trend 4.3 (-8.5, 19.0)
Randolph County 6,10 *** 91.8 (72.0, 115.3) 15 rising rising trend 9.3 (2.1, 17.0)
Polk County 6,10 *** 84.5 (66.1, 106.4) 15 stable stable trend 3.2 (-28.5, 48.9)
Henry County 6,10 *** 115.3 (90.1, 145.3) 14 stable stable trend 7.5 (-31.8, 69.5)
Barry County 6,10 *** 70.4 (54.8, 88.9) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-16.7, 16.5)
Clinton County 6,10 *** 114.2 (88.8, 144.5) 14 stable stable trend 3.1 (-14.0, 23.6)
Stone County 6,10 *** 85.4 (66.2, 108.7) 14 stable stable trend 14.4 (-14.4, 53.1)
Cooper County 6,10 *** 133.1 (102.9, 169.2) 13 stable stable trend 2.9 (-29.7, 50.6)
Perry County 6,10 *** 113.5 (87.6, 144.5) 13 stable stable trend -8.9 (-17.8, 0.9)
Livingston County 6,10 *** 143.9 (111.0, 183.5) 13 stable stable trend 4.9 (-20.2, 38.0)
Saline County 6,10 *** 100.6 (77.4, 128.2) 13 stable stable trend -14.2 (-32.0, 8.2)
McDonald County 6,10 *** 87.6 (67.0, 112.4) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-25.1, 29.5)
Texas County 6,10 *** 85.6 (65.5, 109.8) 12 stable stable trend -2.8 (-18.7, 16.1)
Wright County 6,10 *** 112.4 (85.3, 145.3) 12 stable stable trend 11.8 (-15.1, 47.1)
Pike County 6,10 *** 100.8 (76.4, 130.6) 12 stable stable trend 11.1 (-10.7, 38.1)
Adair County 6,10 *** 95.0 (71.4, 123.5) 11 rising rising trend 7.4 (0.2, 15.2)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 106.0 (79.5, 138.3) 11 stable stable trend 17.6 (-2.3, 41.5)
New Madrid County 6,10 *** 100.1 (75.3, 130.4) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-11.4, 13.3)
Vernon County 6,10 *** 91.1 (68.5, 118.7) 11 stable stable trend 5.8 (-25.8, 50.8)
Andrew County 6,10 *** 101.0 (75.6, 132.3) 11 stable stable trend 7.1 (-2.2, 17.4)
Bollinger County 6,10 *** 137.1 (102.4, 179.9) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-21.3, 20.8)
Benton County 6,10 *** 107.2 (79.3, 141.9) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-34.6, 49.1)
Moniteau County 6,10 *** 99.5 (74.0, 130.9) 10 stable stable trend 5.6 (-4.9, 17.2)
Bates County 6,10 *** 109.2 (80.6, 144.5) 10 stable stable trend -15.7 (-42.6, 23.8)
Macon County 6,10 *** 112.4 (82.7, 149.2) 10 stable stable trend 5.4 (-2.5, 14.0)
Ste. Genevieve County 6,10 *** 89.7 (65.7, 119.6) 9 stable stable trend 7.6 (-5.9, 23.0)
Mississippi County 6,10 *** 98.4 (71.7, 131.9) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-24.9, 39.4)
Dent County 6,10 *** 103.3 (74.8, 138.9) 9 stable stable trend -5.8 (-32.0, 30.4)
Dallas County 6,10 *** 93.7 (67.7, 126.4) 9 stable stable trend 13.3 (-22.3, 65.2)
Gasconade County 6,10 *** 106.7 (76.8, 144.3) 9 stable stable trend 6.1 (-30.5, 62.2)
Pemiscot County 6,10 *** 82.1 (59.2, 110.6) 9 stable stable trend -9.6 (-61.0, 109.3)
Madison County 6,10 *** 109.9 (78.7, 149.3) 8 stable stable trend 7.2 (-20.7, 44.9)
Nodaway County 6,10 *** 76.9 (54.5, 104.9) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-61.0, 145.3)
Osage County 6,10 *** 100.1 (71.7, 135.9) 8 stable stable trend 13.2 (-17.0, 54.4)
Iron County 6,10 *** 129.8 (92.1, 177.8) 8 stable stable trend -12.3 (-33.5, 15.6)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 105.5 (74.5, 145.0) 8 stable stable trend 9.4 (-11.9, 35.7)
Ripley County 6,10 *** 96.6 (68.2, 132.6) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-43.0, 66.0)
Barton County 6,10 *** 113.0 (79.3, 155.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-34.5, 54.5)
DeKalb County 6,10 *** 73.5 (50.8, 103.6) 7 stable stable trend -18.0 (-45.0, 22.2)
Ralls County 6,10 *** 118.0 (81.5, 165.3) 7 stable stable trend 13.7 (-10.7, 44.8)
Cedar County 6,10 *** 90.1 (61.9, 126.7) 7 stable stable trend -19.9 (-38.0, 3.6)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 95.0 (65.1, 134.0) 7 stable stable trend -13.6 (-43.5, 32.1)
Linn County 6,10 *** 97.2 (66.3, 137.3) 6 stable stable trend -10.4 (-35.0, 23.6)
Grundy County 6,10 *** 110.9 (74.5, 158.5) 6 stable stable trend 16.8 (-21.6, 74.0)
Lewis County 6,10 *** 107.1 (71.7, 153.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-43.8, 77.8)
Maries County 6,10 *** 106.2 (70.2, 154.1) 6 stable stable trend 25.3 (-17.0, 89.2)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 119.2 (78.9, 172.6) 6 stable stable trend -10.8 (-41.0, 34.7)
Oregon County 6,10 *** 94.6 (62.5, 137.2) 6 stable stable trend 15.6 (-1.2, 35.3)
Caldwell County 6,10 *** 105.9 (69.5, 154.3) 5 stable stable trend 16.6 (-12.4, 55.2)
Carroll County 6,10 *** 105.0 (69.1, 152.9) 5 stable stable trend 15.0 (-41.8, 127.5)
Daviess County 6,10 *** 119.6 (78.6, 174.0) 5 stable stable trend -6.7 (-41.4, 48.6)
Harrison County 6,10 *** 111.1 (72.3, 162.9) 5 stable stable trend -7.2 (-37.6, 37.8)
Ozark County 6,10 *** 108.0 (69.5, 160.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-24.1, 33.5)
Howard County 6,10 *** 82.6 (52.1, 123.9) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-43.8, 67.5)
Shannon County 6,10 *** 99.2 (62.3, 149.6) 5 stable stable trend -6.2 (-36.9, 39.6)
Hickory County 6,10 *** 109.0 (67.7, 166.2) 4 stable stable trend 27.9 (-22.9, 112.1)
Clark County 6,10 *** 108.8 (67.1, 166.6) 4 stable stable trend -10.0 (-43.5, 43.2)
Carter County 6,10 *** 109.7 (66.8, 169.6) 4 stable stable trend 9.7 (-36.1, 88.3)
Atchison County 6,10 *** 115.9 (69.6, 182.6) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-42.4, 62.0)
Holt County 6,10 *** 132.6 (78.0, 211.7) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-24.7, 37.9)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 105.1 (62.0, 166.4) 4 stable stable trend 41.8 (-8.9, 120.7)
Dade County 6,10 *** 82.2 (47.7, 132.2) 3
*
*
Chariton County 6,10 *** 84.7 (48.2, 137.5) 3
*
*
Douglas County 6,10 *** 47.5 (27.0, 77.3) 3
*
*
Sullivan County 6,10 *** 83.2 (47.4, 135.5) 3
*
*
Gentry County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2019 8:59 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top