Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Missouri 6,10 No 42.5 (41.8, 43.2) 2,979 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.8 (39.7, 39.9) 139,083 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
St. Louis County 6,10 No 41.9 (40.2, 43.5) 525 stable stable trend -3.8 (-11.1, 4.1)
Jackson County 6,10 No 40.5 (38.4, 42.6) 295 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.1, 0.0)
St. Louis City 6,10 No 49.4 (45.9, 53.1) 157 stable stable trend -3.4 (-16.5, 11.7)
St. Charles County 6,10 Yes 35.5 (32.9, 38.4) 137 stable stable trend -3.0 (-11.8, 6.7)
Greene County 6,10 Yes 38.0 (35.0, 41.3) 119 stable stable trend 3.7 (-4.6, 12.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 No 46.0 (42.0, 50.3) 102 stable stable trend -7.7 (-16.8, 2.4)
Clay County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (35.3, 42.7) 89 stable stable trend 1.0 (-12.3, 16.3)
Jasper County 6,10 No 44.9 (39.8, 50.4) 59 stable stable trend 4.0 (-20.2, 35.5)
Boone County 6,10 No 41.1 (36.4, 46.2) 59 stable stable trend 2.5 (-8.8, 15.2)
Franklin County 6,10 No 43.7 (38.5, 49.5) 52 stable stable trend -1.5 (-10.9, 9.0)
Cass County 6,10 No 43.2 (37.9, 49.0) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-13.7, 15.5)
Buchanan County 6,10 No 46.0 (40.2, 52.4) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-11.9, 11.4)
St. Francois County 6,10 No 54.4 (47.3, 62.4) 42 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.1, 12.9)
Cape Girardeau County 6,10 Yes 39.4 (33.8, 45.8) 36 stable stable trend -8.6 (-19.1, 3.3)
Platte County 6,10 Yes 33.8 (28.7, 39.7) 32 stable stable trend -8.0 (-26.1, 14.4)
Cole County 6,10 Yes 39.2 (33.3, 45.9) 32 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.1, 3.8)
Newton County 6,10 No 41.1 (34.8, 48.2) 31 stable stable trend -4.4 (-16.4, 9.4)
Christian County 6,10 Yes 37.2 (31.5, 43.7) 31 stable stable trend -3.7 (-25.5, 24.4)
Camden County 6,10 No 41.7 (34.7, 49.9) 29 stable stable trend 18.8 (-7.1, 52.0)
Butler County 6,10 No 49.7 (41.7, 58.9) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-26.3, 35.3)
Taney County 6,10 Yes 38.2 (31.7, 45.8) 26 stable stable trend 16.3 (-5.6, 43.3)
Howell County 6,10 No 50.0 (41.6, 59.7) 26 stable stable trend -7.3 (-15.1, 1.1)
Scott County 6,10 No 51.6 (42.9, 61.8) 25 stable stable trend 23.4 (-16.0, 81.4)
Stoddard County 6,10 No 59.5 (49.2, 71.4) 24 falling falling trend -12.1 (-22.2, -0.6)
Pettis County 6,10 No 46.5 (38.4, 55.7) 24 rising rising trend 11.4 (6.4, 16.6)
Johnson County 6,10 No 47.6 (39.2, 57.2) 23 stable stable trend 6.9 (-8.9, 25.6)
Lawrence County 6,10 No 46.7 (38.3, 56.5) 23 stable stable trend -10.8 (-22.5, 2.5)
Lincoln County 6,10 No 43.0 (35.2, 52.0) 22 stable stable trend -20.3 (-41.1, 7.8)
Phelps County 6,10 No 45.5 (37.2, 55.3) 22 stable stable trend -4.9 (-13.7, 4.8)
Stone County 6,10 Yes 37.2 (29.9, 46.1) 21 stable stable trend 9.3 (-27.1, 63.8)
Dunklin County 6,10 No 49.0 (39.5, 60.1) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-28.7, 41.2)
Callaway County 6,10 Yes 39.2 (31.6, 48.1) 19 stable stable trend -8.4 (-24.6, 11.5)
Laclede County 6,10 No 43.3 (34.8, 53.4) 18 stable stable trend 8.2 (-23.6, 53.2)
Texas County 6,10 No 51.5 (41.0, 64.2) 18 stable stable trend 11.5 (-22.9, 61.3)
Henry County 6,10 No 54.4 (43.3, 67.9) 17 stable stable trend 5.3 (-17.2, 33.9)
Lafayette County 6,10 No 39.9 (31.8, 49.7) 17 stable stable trend -13.6 (-28.4, 4.3)
Morgan County 6,10 No 52.9 (41.9, 66.4) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-33.5, 52.5)
Crawford County 6,10 No 52.1 (41.4, 64.9) 17 stable stable trend 6.3 (-3.5, 17.1)
Polk County 6,10 No 44.6 (35.4, 55.7) 17 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.6, 10.9)
Marion County 6,10 No 46.3 (36.6, 58.0) 16 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.0, 5.8)
Webster County 6,10 No 40.7 (32.1, 50.9) 16 stable stable trend -8.0 (-24.0, 11.5)
Barry County 6,10 Yes 30.8 (24.2, 38.8) 16 stable stable trend -10.6 (-26.3, 8.4)
Miller County 6,10 No 48.8 (38.3, 61.5) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-13.6, 20.9)
Pulaski County 6,10 No 45.3 (35.5, 56.7) 15 stable stable trend -18.6 (-49.2, 30.4)
Benton County 6,10 No 41.1 (31.9, 53.1) 15 stable stable trend -7.1 (-21.5, 9.9)
Ray County 6,10 No 52.4 (40.8, 66.6) 14 stable stable trend -13.3 (-28.0, 4.4)
Saline County 6,10 No 49.7 (38.4, 63.4) 14 stable stable trend 3.7 (-28.8, 51.0)
Audrain County 6,10 No 42.3 (32.7, 54.1) 14 stable stable trend 7.6 (-19.8, 44.2)
Warren County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (27.2, 44.9) 14 stable stable trend -20.6 (-42.8, 10.4)
Randolph County 6,10 No 46.9 (36.3, 59.7) 14 stable stable trend 10.0 (-14.8, 41.9)
New Madrid County 6,10 No 54.6 (42.0, 70.1) 13 falling falling trend -9.1 (-17.0, -0.4)
Ste. Genevieve County 6,10 No 54.1 (41.3, 70.0) 13 stable stable trend -7.3 (-41.6, 47.0)
Washington County 6,10 No 43.4 (32.9, 56.2) 12 stable stable trend -12.5 (-40.2, 27.9)
McDonald County 6,10 No 51.0 (38.6, 66.1) 12 stable stable trend -9.7 (-36.6, 28.8)
Pike County 6,10 No 50.7 (38.6, 65.7) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-30.3, 39.5)
Vernon County 6,10 No 47.1 (35.6, 61.3) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-17.1, 22.5)
Dallas County 6,10 No 49.0 (37.0, 64.1) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-30.7, 45.5)
Wright County 6,10 No 45.8 (34.3, 60.2) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-7.5, 9.3)
Andrew County 6,10 No 49.2 (37.0, 64.6) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-5.6, 12.3)
Bates County 6,10 No 48.2 (36.1, 63.4) 11 stable stable trend -18.3 (-41.2, 13.6)
Macon County 6,10 No 45.9 (34.1, 61.0) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-17.1, 15.2)
Cedar County 6,10 No 48.9 (36.0, 65.6) 11 stable stable trend 15.3 (-24.8, 76.8)
Linn County 6,10 No 60.1 (44.2, 80.3) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-14.0, 11.7)
Clinton County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (28.9, 51.5) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-34.2, 53.5)
Pemiscot County 6,10 No 49.3 (36.7, 64.9) 10 stable stable trend 13.9 (-13.4, 49.8)
Adair County 6,10 No 41.0 (30.3, 54.4) 10 stable stable trend -8.9 (-28.3, 15.8)
Gasconade County 6,10 No 43.0 (31.4, 58.2) 10 stable stable trend -3.9 (-30.4, 32.6)
Mississippi County 6,10 No 54.6 (40.1, 73.0) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-29.1, 41.8)
Perry County 6,10 Yes 37.4 (27.4, 50.2) 10 stable stable trend -12.5 (-32.7, 13.9)
Ripley County 6,10 No 49.5 (36.2, 66.6) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-20.1, 27.5)
Dent County 6,10 No 40.0 (28.9, 54.5) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-30.8, 35.9)
Barton County 6,10 No 51.6 (37.2, 70.4) 9 stable stable trend 35.3 (-0.8, 84.5)
Livingston County 6,10 No 43.6 (31.3, 59.5) 9 stable stable trend 13.1 (-14.5, 49.5)
Nodaway County 6,10 Yes 35.0 (25.1, 47.7) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-25.5, 40.2)
Wayne County 6,10 No 43.9 (31.3, 60.7) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-26.8, 42.6)
Cooper County 6,10 Yes 39.2 (28.0, 53.7) 8 stable stable trend -17.0 (-50.1, 38.3)
Bollinger County 6,10 No 46.5 (32.3, 65.1) 7 stable stable trend -7.0 (-37.2, 37.8)
DeKalb County 6,10 No 47.1 (33.0, 65.6) 7 falling falling trend -20.4 (-30.3, -9.1)
Grundy County 6,10 No 44.2 (30.6, 62.8) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-31.6, 54.3)
Douglas County 6,10 Yes 31.1 (21.5, 44.5) 7 stable stable trend -10.9 (-37.4, 27.0)
Iron County 6,10 No 50.1 (34.3, 71.2) 7 stable stable trend -15.5 (-35.6, 10.9)
Ralls County 6,10 No 50.4 (34.5, 71.8) 7 stable stable trend -11.8 (-46.0, 44.1)
Caldwell County 6,10 No 52.4 (35.7, 74.9) 7 stable stable trend -13.5 (-45.5, 37.4)
Monroe County 6,10 No 53.4 (36.3, 76.8) 7 stable stable trend -6.8 (-37.8, 39.5)
Montgomery County 6,10 Yes 38.2 (25.6, 55.3) 6 stable stable trend -27.0 (-56.1, 21.3)
Harrison County 6,10 No 47.6 (31.7, 69.5) 6 stable stable trend -11.1 (-39.7, 31.1)
Moniteau County 6,10 Yes 34.6 (23.4, 49.5) 6 stable stable trend -21.6 (-43.6, 8.9)
Osage County 6,10 Yes 35.6 (23.8, 51.6) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-35.4, 59.8)
Lewis County 6,10 No 44.9 (29.7, 65.7) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-31.7, 35.9)
Oregon County 6,10 Yes 36.6 (23.8, 54.6) 6 stable stable trend 10.6 (-24.2, 61.3)
Daviess County 6,10 No 53.5 (34.8, 79.2) 6 stable stable trend -4.3 (-42.5, 59.5)
Madison County 6,10 Yes 33.2 (22.0, 48.8) 6 stable stable trend -11.5 (-43.1, 37.5)
Carroll County 6,10 No 40.5 (26.3, 60.5) 5 rising rising trend 8.7 (3.6, 14.0)
Ozark County 6,10 Yes 36.3 (22.4, 56.5) 5 rising rising trend 29.5 (14.1, 46.9)
St. Clair County 6,10 Yes 27.7 (18.1, 42.7) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-19.5, 23.9)
Hickory County 6,10 Yes 28.0 (16.6, 46.1) 5 stable stable trend -17.6 (-49.5, 34.7)
Shelby County 6,10 No 55.5 (35.2, 84.5) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-25.3, 36.5)
Chariton County 6,10 Yes 36.4 (22.9, 56.6) 5 stable stable trend -13.5 (-34.6, 14.4)
Dade County 6,10 Yes 37.1 (23.7, 57.4) 5 stable stable trend -5.0 (-42.7, 57.7)
Gentry County 6,10 No 55.0 (34.2, 84.4) 5 stable stable trend -14.7 (-47.7, 39.1)
Howard County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (24.4, 59.3) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-39.8, 58.3)
Maries County 6,10 Yes 38.4 (24.4, 58.4) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-36.9, 63.8)
Reynolds County 6,10 No 43.2 (27.6, 66.6) 5 stable stable trend -5.8 (-35.6, 37.9)
Shannon County 6,10 No 49.6 (30.9, 75.7) 5 stable stable trend 20.3 (-47.6, 176.1)
Carter County 6,10 No 55.2 (34.2, 85.1) 5 stable stable trend 15.9 (-18.0, 63.7)
Sullivan County 6,10 No 53.8 (33.6, 82.6) 5 falling falling trend -31.5 (-47.3, -11.1)
Atchison County 6,10 No 43.6 (25.7, 71.3) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-41.7, 83.1)
Holt County 6,10 No 42.5 (25.1, 70.9) 4 stable stable trend -35.3 (-59.4, 3.3)
Schuyler County 6,10 No 56.5 (32.9, 92.5) 4 stable stable trend -20.4 (-45.3, 15.8)
Clark County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/24/2017 9:59 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top