Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Missouri 6,10 75.8 (74.9, 76.8) 5,313 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 62.4 (62.3, 62.6) 214,614 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Wayne County 6,10 114.9 (95.3, 138.1) 25 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.5, 10.6)
Mercer County 6,10 114.1 (78.1, 163.9) 7 stable stable trend -19.5 (-48.9, 27.0)
New Madrid County 6,10 112.7 (94.5, 133.8) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.9)
Carter County 6,10 110.0 (79.5, 149.1) 9 stable stable trend 6.7 (-38.0, 83.6)
Madison County 6,10 106.8 (86.1, 131.6) 19 stable stable trend 9.1 (-4.8, 25.0)
St. Francois County 6,10 106.8 (96.7, 117.8) 82 stable stable trend -0.0 (-7.8, 8.3)
Pulaski County 6,10 103.4 (88.4, 120.0) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-14.0, 14.4)
Iron County 6,10 103.3 (81.7, 129.7) 16 stable stable trend 8.1 (-27.0, 59.9)
Henry County 6,10 100.3 (85.2, 117.6) 33 stable stable trend -4.1 (-17.8, 11.8)
Dunklin County 6,10 100.1 (86.8, 115.1) 41 stable stable trend 6.8 (-7.3, 23.1)
Mississippi County 6,10 100.0 (80.0, 123.8) 18 stable stable trend -4.4 (-26.9, 25.1)
Scott County 6,10 99.0 (86.8, 112.6) 49 stable stable trend 3.8 (-7.5, 16.5)
Bollinger County 6,10 96.4 (76.2, 120.9) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-11.2, 17.2)
Butler County 6,10 95.7 (84.7, 107.8) 56 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.1, 13.0)
Clark County 6,10 95.2 (69.7, 128.1) 9 stable stable trend -5.7 (-26.5, 21.1)
Ripley County 6,10 95.0 (77.0, 116.5) 20 stable stable trend 9.8 (-20.2, 50.9)
Carroll County 6,10 94.6 (72.8, 121.9) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-18.6, 16.6)
Pike County 6,10 94.3 (77.3, 114.0) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-17.9, 20.2)
Stoddard County 6,10 93.4 (80.6, 107.9) 39 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.1, 9.1)
Crawford County 6,10 93.1 (78.6, 109.7) 30 stable stable trend 2.8 (-18.3, 29.4)
Washington County 6,10 93.0 (78.0, 110.2) 28 stable stable trend -6.2 (-23.5, 15.0)
Putnam County 6,10 92.9 (65.0, 131.2) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-32.3, 53.9)
Ray County 6,10 92.8 (77.5, 110.4) 27 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.8, 11.8)
Knox County 6,10 92.7 (61.9, 136.1) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-22.0, 20.9)
Linn County 6,10 91.5 (73.1, 113.9) 17 stable stable trend 3.0 (-12.0, 20.5)
Audrain County 6,10 90.1 (75.8, 106.5) 29 stable stable trend 2.8 (-18.0, 29.1)
Caldwell County 6,10 89.3 (67.1, 117.1) 11 stable stable trend 3.9 (-24.8, 43.5)
Benton County 6,10 89.1 (75.5, 105.3) 33 stable stable trend 8.4 (-24.9, 56.6)
St. Louis City 6,10 88.9 (84.1, 93.8) 275 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 1.3)
Miller County 6,10 88.8 (74.5, 105.2) 28 stable stable trend -6.6 (-29.9, 24.6)
Sullivan County 6,10 88.6 (62.9, 122.2) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-16.8, 22.4)
Pemiscot County 6,10 88.6 (71.4, 108.7) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-17.2, 22.9)
Marion County 6,10 87.9 (74.7, 102.8) 33 stable stable trend -4.3 (-11.1, 3.0)
Lincoln County 6,10 87.7 (76.4, 100.2) 45 stable stable trend 2.3 (-24.9, 39.3)
Buchanan County 6,10 86.8 (78.8, 95.4) 88 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.4, 8.1)
Livingston County 6,10 86.8 (69.3, 107.7) 18 stable stable trend -9.3 (-30.5, 18.2)
Jefferson County 6,10 85.9 (80.5, 91.7) 195 stable stable trend -6.0 (-11.8, 0.1)
Jasper County 6,10 85.8 (78.7, 93.4) 109 stable stable trend 6.6 (-13.7, 31.6)
Morgan County 6,10 85.0 (71.4, 100.9) 29 stable stable trend 3.2 (-28.7, 49.3)
Randolph County 6,10 84.8 (70.4, 101.3) 25 stable stable trend 3.7 (-9.8, 19.1)
Clinton County 6,10 83.5 (68.5, 100.9) 22 stable stable trend 7.5 (-24.3, 52.6)
Wright County 6,10 83.4 (68.1, 101.4) 21 falling falling trend -11.5 (-19.2, -3.2)
Dade County 6,10 83.3 (61.2, 112.1) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-10.2, 14.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 83.0 (64.6, 105.6) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.6, 12.7)
Howell County 6,10 81.4 (70.8, 93.2) 44 stable stable trend -5.0 (-14.5, 5.5)
Bates County 6,10 80.8 (65.3, 99.3) 19 stable stable trend -7.0 (-33.3, 29.5)
Taney County 6,10 80.6 (71.4, 90.7) 58 stable stable trend -6.8 (-15.6, 2.9)
Lewis County 6,10 79.9 (60.0, 105.1) 11 rising rising trend 15.5 (5.9, 25.9)
Harrison County 6,10 79.6 (59.0, 106.0) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-36.5, 50.3)
Callaway County 6,10 79.4 (68.4, 91.8) 39 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.6, 1.4)
Dallas County 6,10 79.2 (63.5, 98.1) 18 stable stable trend -17.0 (-38.1, 11.3)
Clay County 6,10 79.0 (73.8, 84.6) 173 stable stable trend -0.2 (-15.6, 17.9)
Ozark County 6,10 78.9 (61.1, 101.7) 14 stable stable trend 5.0 (-10.1, 22.5)
Cedar County 6,10 78.3 (62.0, 98.1) 17 stable stable trend -6.8 (-32.5, 28.7)
McDonald County 6,10 77.8 (62.7, 95.6) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-27.2, 39.1)
Barry County 6,10 77.4 (66.7, 89.4) 39 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.2)
Monroe County 6,10 77.2 (56.8, 103.4) 10 stable stable trend 10.1 (-28.7, 70.1)
Franklin County 6,10 76.9 (69.9, 84.4) 92 stable stable trend 1.3 (-11.3, 15.7)
Laclede County 6,10 76.5 (65.4, 89.1) 35 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.7, 20.3)
Warren County 6,10 76.0 (64.2, 89.4) 30 stable stable trend -6.4 (-24.3, 15.7)
Vernon County 6,10 75.9 (62.1, 92.2) 21 rising rising trend 20.4 (12.8, 28.6)
Jackson County 6,10 75.3 (72.4, 78.2) 542 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 1.1)
Perry County 6,10 75.1 (60.2, 92.7) 18 stable stable trend -4.2 (-26.6, 25.0)
Daviess County 6,10 75.0 (54.0, 102.4) 9 stable stable trend 7.2 (-30.4, 65.2)
Dent County 6,10 74.4 (59.5, 92.5) 17 stable stable trend -13.0 (-35.9, 18.0)
Saline County 6,10 74.3 (60.8, 90.0) 22 stable stable trend 4.5 (-17.8, 32.9)
Lafayette County 6,10 73.9 (62.8, 86.6) 32 stable stable trend 4.0 (-6.7, 15.8)
Webster County 6,10 73.9 (62.4, 87.0) 30 stable stable trend -6.0 (-25.7, 19.0)
St. Charles County 6,10 73.7 (69.8, 77.9) 264 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.9, 4.2)
St. Clair County 6,10 73.6 (56.2, 96.1) 13 falling falling trend -16.7 (-25.2, -7.3)
Nodaway County 6,10 73.5 (58.8, 90.8) 18 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.3, 10.3)
Hickory County 6,10 73.4 (57.5, 94.5) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-14.1, 14.5)
Grundy County 6,10 71.9 (54.2, 94.5) 11 stable stable trend -10.5 (-28.2, 11.5)
Shelby County 6,10 71.9 (48.7, 103.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-20.9, 22.6)
Phelps County 6,10 71.7 (61.5, 83.2) 36 stable stable trend 3.1 (-8.7, 16.5)
Pettis County 6,10 71.2 (61.0, 82.7) 35 stable stable trend 2.9 (-15.7, 25.7)
Atchison County 6,10 71.0 (48.6, 102.4) 7 stable stable trend -3.8 (-34.8, 41.9)
Texas County 6,10 71.0 (59.3, 84.6) 26 stable stable trend -9.8 (-33.3, 21.9)
Shannon County 6,10 70.3 (49.9, 97.2) 9 stable stable trend 6.3 (-12.0, 28.4)
Cass County 6,10 70.1 (63.4, 77.4) 81 stable stable trend 4.9 (-5.7, 16.8)
Cape Girardeau County 6,10 70.1 (62.4, 78.5) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-13.7, 15.1)
Greene County 6,10 69.8 (65.7, 74.1) 220 stable stable trend -6.3 (-14.3, 2.4)
Cooper County 6,10 69.0 (54.2, 87.0) 15 stable stable trend -2.8 (-16.0, 12.3)
St. Louis County 6,10 69.0 (66.9, 71.1) 854 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Camden County 6,10 68.6 (60.0, 78.3) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-18.2, 21.6)
Reynolds County 6,10 68.4 (47.7, 96.9) 7 stable stable trend 11.7 (-13.6, 44.4)
Holt County 6,10 68.3 (43.8, 103.9) 5 stable stable trend -7.5 (-35.8, 33.2)
Chariton County 6,10 67.7 (48.1, 93.9) 8 stable stable trend -8.8 (-46.6, 56.0)
Barton County 6,10 67.2 (50.7, 87.9) 12 rising rising trend 14.8 (9.3, 20.6)
Ralls County 6,10 67.0 (48.7, 90.7) 9 stable stable trend 27.6 (-11.5, 84.0)
Stone County 6,10 66.5 (57.1, 77.5) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-19.1, 22.7)
Lawrence County 6,10 66.5 (56.7, 77.6) 34 stable stable trend -2.3 (-15.6, 13.0)
Gentry County 6,10 66.3 (44.9, 95.6) 7 stable stable trend -21.5 (-50.8, 25.5)
Johnson County 6,10 66.1 (56.2, 77.2) 33 stable stable trend -0.0 (-13.2, 15.2)
Polk County 6,10 66.0 (55.0, 78.7) 26 stable stable trend -4.3 (-15.8, 8.8)
Oregon County 6,10 65.2 (49.3, 85.6) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-21.4, 27.3)
Schuyler County 6,10 64.2 (38.7, 102.0) 4 stable stable trend 5.9 (-44.8, 103.0)
Gasconade County 6,10 64.0 (50.2, 81.1) 15 falling falling trend -11.0 (-17.9, -3.4)
Cole County 6,10 64.0 (56.4, 72.4) 53 stable stable trend 2.9 (-7.4, 14.3)
Boone County 6,10 63.4 (57.4, 69.8) 86 falling falling trend -7.1 (-12.6, -1.2)
Christian County 6,10 63.0 (55.5, 71.2) 53 stable stable trend -2.2 (-9.4, 5.6)
Maries County 6,10 60.4 (43.0, 83.6) 8 stable stable trend 14.9 (-6.7, 41.6)
Platte County 6,10 59.8 (52.7, 67.5) 56 stable stable trend -2.6 (-17.7, 15.2)
Osage County 6,10 59.6 (44.3, 78.8) 10 stable stable trend -15.0 (-40.6, 21.5)
Scotland County 6,10 58.0 (34.6, 92.8) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-22.8, 34.3)
Newton County 6,10 57.8 (50.1, 66.4) 42 stable stable trend 2.1 (-26.3, 41.5)
Adair County 6,10 57.8 (45.3, 72.7) 15 stable stable trend -3.2 (-16.9, 12.7)
Moniteau County 6,10 54.6 (40.2, 72.8) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-30.3, 42.0)
Howard County 6,10 54.6 (38.0, 76.5) 7 rising rising trend 10.4 (1.1, 20.6)
Ste. Genevieve County 6,10 53.6 (41.3, 68.8) 13 stable stable trend -5.5 (-25.1, 19.1)
Douglas County 6,10 51.9 (38.7, 68.9) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-28.4, 34.0)
Andrew County 6,10 50.5 (38.0, 66.2) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-10.2, 18.4)
Macon County 6,10 41.9 (31.1, 55.9) 10 rising rising trend 11.9 (5.2, 19.0)
DeKalb County 6,10 39.5 (26.8, 56.7) 6 stable stable trend -9.0 (-52.3, 73.8)
Worth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2016 3:12 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top