Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana 6 N/A 109.0 (105.3, 112.8) N/A 662 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Broadwater County 6 Urban 117.6 (72.6, 180.2) 14 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.5, 9.9)
Carbon County 6 Urban 136.2 (95.6, 188.6) 3 (1, 30) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.0)
Cascade County 6 Urban 97.7 (85.1, 111.5) 25 (12, 31) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.4)
Gallatin County 6 Urban 103.4 (93.1, 114.6) 20 (10, 29) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 109.1 (76.6, 151.0) 18 (2, 33) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.0)
Lewis and Clark County 6 Urban 125.1 (110.0, 141.7) 7 (2, 20) 50 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.2)
Missoula County 6 Urban 103.3 (92.8, 114.6) 21 (11, 29) 72 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Stillwater County 6 Urban 119.3 (79.1, 172.9) 11 (1, 33) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.0)
Yellowstone County 6 Urban 118.5 (109.0, 128.6) 12 (5, 20) 115 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Beaverhead County 6 Rural 78.0 (46.5, 122.5) 32 (6, 33) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.3, 2.9)
Big Horn County 6 Rural 88.2 (58.8, 126.2) 27 (5, 33) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.3)
Custer County 6 Rural 103.5 (72.0, 143.9) 22 (2, 33) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.4, 2.0)
Dawson County 6 Rural 133.5 (92.3, 186.7) 6 (1, 31) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 2.8)
Deer Lodge County 6 Rural 86.7 (54.0, 132.7) 29 (4, 33) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.0)
Fergus County 6 Rural 85.4 (55.7, 125.1) 31 (5, 33) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.9, 6.8)
Flathead County 6 Rural 118.7 (106.6, 131.8) 13 (4, 22) 70 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.4, 4.3)
Glacier County 6 Rural 117.0 (84.3, 157.6) 15 (2, 32) 9 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.5, 8.5)
Hill County 6 Rural 96.7 (69.6, 130.3) 26 (4, 33) 9 falling falling trend -31.1 (-49.8, -2.2)
Lake County 6 Rural 105.3 (83.8, 130.5) 19 (4, 32) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.4)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 111.0 (82.5, 146.1) 17 (2, 32) 10 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.3, 6.2)
Madison County 6 Rural 98.7 (60.1, 153.0) 24 (2, 33) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.8, 4.6)
Musselshell County 6 Rural 161.8 (96.4, 254.8) 2 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.6, 9.8)
Park County 6 Rural 88.0 (63.6, 118.9) 28 (8, 33) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 3.8)
Pondera County 6 Rural 133.7 (81.5, 205.7) 5 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.5)
Powell County 6 Rural 85.5 (51.2, 135.7) 30 (4, 33) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.3)
Ravalli County 6 Rural 103.0 (84.8, 123.9) 23 (6, 31) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Richland County 6 Rural 74.0 (47.8, 109.1) 33 (11, 33) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 3.1)
Roosevelt County 6 Rural 134.6 (95.7, 183.2) 4 (1, 30) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.3, 7.6)
Rosebud County 6 Rural 175.7 (123.5, 241.3) 1 (1, 22) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.2)
Sanders County 6 Rural 120.3 (82.1, 170.0) 10 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 6.8)
Silver Bow County 6 Rural 121.8 (100.3, 146.4) 9 (2, 27) 23 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.9)
Teton County 6 Rural 114.4 (66.5, 182.4) 16 (1, 33) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.7, 6.8)
Valley County 6 Rural 125.6 (80.4, 186.5) 8 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chouteau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fallon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granite County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Judith Basin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meagher County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sweet Grass County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Toole County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 5:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top